Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF? Tank crew of M1 tank injured by RPG?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:58 PM
Original message
WTF? Tank crew of M1 tank injured by RPG?

Anyone have experience with this beast?

I just saw on BBC World during their iraq report, video showed crewman with obviously terribly burned hands crawling out of the turret of an M1, with fire coming from the rear of the turret, while the audio described how the crew injuries were not life threatening after the tank was hit by an RPG.

I thought the M1 was supposed to be impervious to almost anything. At least that's how it was advertized. How the hell could it be damaged by a simple handheld RPG?

Or are we buying pigs in pokes without guaranteeing performance to spec?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. my husband used to be a tanker
and he can't figure out what would have done that kind of damage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually,
I think it was a Marine Corps landing craft...not an M1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No, I saw video on CNN and CNNI. It was absolutely a tank.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. It was not an AAV <- coming from a fmr AAV driver
and it was too low to be an LAV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. M1s are NOT invulnerable....
and it might not have been an "RPG" but something more powerful.
Remember that a couple months back an M1 had been disabled by
some militias? It completely wiped out the tank and the only telltale
sign was a pinky-sized hole on its side near the tracks....

If the militias got a hold of some of the latest Russian ATGMs
systems, then the M1s are in deep trouble....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. yes
in that report about that tank there were reports of new russian atgm`s in southern iraq..just the thing for urban warfare-take out a tank in the narrow streets effectively making a road block...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ever hear of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle???
...check into it. We have a lot of them. See how they were tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. RPG seems an unlikely candidate for that
HEAT? (High Explosive Anti-Tank).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. HEAT or HEPT, maybe.
HEPT= high explosive plastic tank round. Could be a round from some kind of LAW (light antitank weapon), bazooka or recoilless rifle-type weapon, more likely the former since RRs are pretty big to be dragged around by guerillas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. HEPT ... new one on me
Learn something new every time. Bad news, anyway you cut the pie. Anything that can hurt an Abrams would shred a Bradley. Hope there aren't too many of those lying around.

Who am I kidding? There are probably several hunred to thousands of 'em. Jeeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. That tank was supposed to stand up to Soviet armor.
Something's fishy about this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fitzovich Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. From the little I understand
The M1 is impervious to RPG's unless of course they got a lucky hit of sometype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dobbs had Grange on
and asked him the same thing. Grange's answer was (I'm paraphrasing from memory) that even a 70 ton combat vehicle could be vulnerable depending on tactics and terrain.

Also, in another thread it was asked why it was on fire, and after seeing the video there were rucks or vests strapped to the outside, and it looked like that was what was on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Open turret/driver hatch.
It is the desert, and they don't drive buttoned up all the time. As meantioned above it could also be a hightech AT round of some kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. yup
Thats what I was thinking too, the hatch was open and the round went in the turret or exploded near the open hatch. Or maybe it was one of those Russian anti-tank rounds mentioned already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:07 PM
Original message
RPG my ass
They can barely penetrate light armor, much less the armor of an M1 Abrams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. There have been a number of M1's taken out in this mess two
were killed by an unknown device which penetrated the tank to it's core but only made a hole the size of pencil. The others have been taken out with RPG-7's with hits between the turent and body. It is an extremely small target area and must be hit precisely. No hit on the reactive armor has penetrated except the small pencil holes and no explanation has been put forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExWife Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. My ex-M1A1 service brother says they had the hatch open and riding
"windage" as he called it. That would allow fragments of an explosion hitting the tank. Other than that an RPG would only make noise in the tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. The crew may have been popped up when they got hit.
I think the injured crewmembers were popped out of their hatches when they got hit. It looked to me like they were able to move the tank to an area where it was safe to dismount. The tank was not on fire, it was some of the gear stowed in the bustlerack (on the back of the turrett) that was burning. An RPG packs a good punch, and might blow a track off, but it will not penetrate the armor of an M-1. IMO, the tank in the video was pretty much undamaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Also consider that journalist don't have a clue what they're talking about
half the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nothing is impervious, but here is some info
Link to good article on RPG-7: http://www.g2mil.com/RPG.htm

Link to general description of M1: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m1.htm

Article on "active protection systems" (the type used on the M1- article talks about survivability) : http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/3aps98.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. The M-1 is not invincible
The US Army's M1 Abrams main battle tank (MBT) top side, and rear armour "remains susceptible to penetration" and needs improving, according to the Tank and Automotive Command's (TACOM) Abrams programme manager office (PM Abrams).

In a report into the US Army's principal MBT's performance during Operation 'Iraqi Freedom', however, PM Abrams said the tank's frontal turret and hull armour continues to provide excellent crew protection.


-snip-


Details of the M1 losses were given, including one where 25mm armour-piercing depleted uranium (AP-DU) rounds from an unidentified weapon disabled a US tank near Najaf after penetrating the engine compartment. Another Abrams was disabled near Karbala after a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) penetrated the rear engine compartment and one was lost in Baghdad after its external auxiliary power unit was set on fire by medium-calibre fire.




http://www.janes.com/defence/land_forces/news/jdw/jdw030620_1_n.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. rear of turret and tank
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 07:44 PM by Zech Marquis
are big targets to hit with some kind of anti tank missile, rpg will near a very lucky shot. That's where the tank crew--driver in front by himself--do their business. But if they had the turret hatch open...any missile hit would mess up the crew inside. like someone said before, a rpg on one of these M1s would be like a speedbump, so it had to be something with more pow to it :-(

And when you have to be carried out of an M1 all cut and burnt up, you know it was more than a lucky shot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is what took out a couple of M-1s early in the war...the Kornet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. M-1 is vulnerable if the hatches are open
Normal operation mode of a tank is with the commander half-out of the top hatch and the driver looking out the drive hatch in front.

Tanks only "button-up" when there is an enemy threat. Tanks get outrageously hot inside when riding around buttoned up, especially in a desert in the Middle East.

Poor bastards probably got ambushed in a normally secure area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Question
The bulge in the middle of the main barrel--what's that for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captain_change Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. That bulge
It is the bore evacuator. It creates a negative pressure in the tube in the outward direction to suck all the smoke out rather than having it blow back into the turret when the breech is open. When you see a tank (Also Artillery) fire, after the round and flame shoot out, you will see a little puff of smoke. On the 120 MM, the bore evacuator is pretty big in comparison to the 105MM (we called it the pregnant bore evacuator). In WW II you would see tank crews looking like chimney sweeps from the smoke after the battle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. What kind of munitions are these 105/120 guns? Are they 'cartridges',
like what's commonly called a 'bullet' (a casing with a self-contained projectile like a .50 cal) or do they use a separate charge to shove out some other kind of elective head...and are there any 'casings' that need to be disposed of? (I'm very familiar with small arms but have no knowledge of anything bigger than something you can shoulder fire...)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captain_change Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Munitions
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 10:33 PM by captain_change
The 105 MM is out of the system for tanks (except for some allies with M60 & M48). The 120 MM fires a Sabot round, a depleted uranium dart that goes 1 mile a second, HEAT round (High Explosive Anti-Tank) with a shaped charged, HEPE used against bunkers etc. I am not sure if they have a "Bee Hive" round for the 120 MM, this round has 18,000 tungsten tipped flechetts that will deploy at 300 meters or farther (by a setting on the round), ruin any troops in the open whole day.

All the rounds are one piece, with a cartridge remaining in the breech after firing (well not in the breech, but ejacted onto out when the gun comes out of battery). The 120 mm is a small cartridge about the size of a ash tray with everything else going out the tube
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Head...hurting...
but I think I get it. Thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devils Advocate NZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Link to raw footage from Reuters...
If you go to this page:

http://reuters.feedroom.com/ifr_main.jsp?st=1081475229141&rf=bm&mp=WMP&wmp=1&rm=1&cpf=true&fr=040504_115106_17d5d2axfbbb1d5cfaxw415&rdm=624470.0836977506#frtop

And click on the link:

Injured Soldiers
Major Fighting In Fallujah

You will see raw footage of the incident in question. (well it looks like what everyone is talking about, but I could be wrong)

The tank commander gets out of the tank first with an injured hand. Later either the gunner or loader tries to get out but has to be assisted. At one point there is a close up and he appears to have a shrapnel wound to his groin or thigh.

It looks to me like the injuries came from shrapnel bouncing around inside the tank, and I doubt that could have happened unless the tanks armour was penetrated.

The only other way shrapnel could get in would be for an explosion overhead to have sent shrapnel down through the turret hatches, and that would have shredded the tank commander.

So whatever did this, did it by punching a hole in the side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Dumb question: Why don't they air-condition tanks?
if they're vulnerable with the hatch open and the hatch is open cause it's hot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captain_change Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Air conditioning
The M1 has an over pressure system for NBC, but it doesn't blow air conditioned air. Tankers have "cool vests" that are suppose to circulate cooling water around their torso
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twillig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Well, the NBC system actually does blow cool air
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 10:48 PM by Twillig
The cool vests hook up to vents connected to the NBC system. It was very nice and cool rolling through the desert with the NBC going.

Of course that was all back in 87-91 and GW1. So I could be out of date.

That tank looks like it survived pretty well. The joke from basic on with the 'most survivalable tank' propaganda that we were supposed to have faith in was 'Yeah, the tank will survive. You won't.'

It's supposed to get hit in the frontal armor, after all. Other areas are less protected. It's quite clear if you look closely enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
captain_change Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Probably right
I mainly used the M48, M60 and the first M1's (105mm) , never actually saw one of the those famous cool vests, just read about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twillig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. we never used the vests themselves.
mostly just stuck the hose down our shirts or our pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. Is this what you're talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
37. The pencil holes are the sort made by French rockets
Col. Hackworth wrote about their being used by the Croats against Serb tanks in the Bosnian conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC