Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is Dave Frasca?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:08 AM
Original message
Who is Dave Frasca?
Edited on Sat Apr-10-04 02:20 AM by scottxyz
...Today the Judiciary Committee met secretly with Dave Frasca, the former head of the FBI's radical fundamentalist unit and the agent that many up here on Capitol Hill believe is the one person who should have had access to two of the biggest dots that were never connected. Frasca was the point person in FBI Headquarters for the Moussaoui investigation in Minneapolis, and his name was also on the distribution list for the Phoenix memo that warned about the Middle Eastern men training at U.S. flight schools. Frasca told the committee that he actually never saw the Phoenix memo.

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0206/04/asb.00.html

= = =

Patrick J. Leahy (an anthrax target) (D-VT) Charles E. Grussley, (R-Iowa) and Arlen Specter (R-PA) "have identified Dave Frasca" as the cutting edge of the U.S. Government's pre-September 11 'do-nothing' policy in regards to Al Qaeda terrorists.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MOO208B.html

= = =

... I know this for a fact - there are FBI agents in NY who would tear
Frasca limb from limb should they meet him in a dark alley for his
part in letting 9/11 proceed. And there is nothing Karl Rove could do
about that. There are some in this mob controlled FBI who have
limits... heck, even the mob has better family values than this White
House...

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dave+Frasca&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=25ff0ff2.0401291605.29b0115%40posting.google.com&rnum=3

= = =

Dave Frasca (FBI Osama Bin Laden Unit)

Frasca was the recipient of both the Minneapolis memo seeking search
warrants for Zacarias Moussaoui's computer, and the Phoenix memo
seeking a nationwide canvass of flight schools for suspicious Arab
students. Frasca blocked both efforts. Why?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Dave+Frasca&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=3d5173f9.103013%40news.ukf.net&rnum=6



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. More on Dave Frasca
FBI's Dave Frasca key player in 9/11 conspiracy

SAN FRANCISCO - (Mar 28. - Libertythink.com) Michael Ruppert reported to the International Citizens' Inquiry in to 9/11 on Friday night that FBI agent Dave Frasca was a key player in the 9/11 cover-ups.

Ruppert, the former LAPD narcotics officer turned citizen researcher, asserted that SSA Frasca of the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit:

# Issued the FBI order 199I to seize investigation of Saudi/bin-Laden backed "charity" networks.

# Directed the suppression of Chicago based FBI Agent Robert Wright's investigation of Islamic terror networks.

# Suppressed the Phoenix flight school memo.

# Supressed the Minnesota Moussaoui investigation

# Ordered destroyed email intercepts of the bin Laden network captured by the FBI Denver office


http://libertythink.com/2004_03_28_archives.html#108058715621589392
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Whoa.......he's got roots back to the Bush1 administration.
That's news to me. I've always wondered about his role.....what bothers me is why the guy was given a promotion and more responsibility AFTER 9/11. It is unfathomable as to why people are rewarded for stuffing information that might have thwarted 9/11. Same with Meyers on the military side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Promotion for doing exactly what was required from him
(beware of my evil conspiracy theories)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. IE: Not many people are needed for a conspiracy
One standard argument of those who easily call dissenting ideas "conspiracy theories" is that far too many people would have known of such a big conspiracy, and that that would be impossible, because something would have leaked.

The Frasca case shows, however: You only need few people in the right places. The huge "intelligence failure" rarely did exist on lower levels of the agencies (after all, the names of many of the Atta-crew were known years before 9/11), but people like Frasca made the "failure" possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Indeed.
I think people don't realize how certain well-positioned people in our CIA/FBI/ military could effect the event. One things for sure, this info should have been "stovepiped" up the channel....and this needs to be probed as to why. Meyers no-show during the event assured that the military response would be delayed.

Another way we ddn't react was when calls from bases were coming into command. When asked what was needed for weaponry, the orders were "everything you've got". That effectively meant delaying the response while planes were outfitted with ATA missles. Why would this be needed on 1st response? Certainly the 1st interceptors needed to only make visual contact with the cockpit. Cannon rounds would suffice on bringing down a commercial liner, if this was called for. The CO that gave these orders died suddenly a few months after 9/11. This is in the www.cooperativeresearch.org timeline, I believe.

It disturbs me, too, that the hardworking FBI/CIA field operatives had the information, yet they are taking the hit for people above them who, for whatever reason, did not connect the dots. The institutions are being blamed, when it is clearly identified people within the organizations that did not react to the information they had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC