Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Bush) Administration seeks to void damage award to Gulf War POWs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 04:44 AM
Original message
(Bush) Administration seeks to void damage award to Gulf War POWs


http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2803912.php

April 08, 2004

Administration seeks to void damage award to Gulf War POWs

By Jennifer C. Kerr
Associated Press


The Bush administration urged an appeals court Wednesday to overturn a judge’s order awarding nearly $1 billion in Iraqi money to 17 Americans taken prisoner by Saddam Hussein’s government during the 1991 Gulf War. Attorneys for the POWs, who were tortured and starved, countered that the award — to be paid from Iraqi government assets frozen in this country — in no way threatens the rebuilding of Iraq, taking issue with the central argument of the administration.Justice Department attorney Gregory Katsas said that foreign policy interests are at stake, and that the POWs’ claims should be handled through diplomatic channels rather than the courts.

snip....

Stewart Baker, attorney for the POWs, told a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that his clients simply want the judgment in their favor upheld to affirm their suffering and allow them to collect at a later time. “French oil companies are going to walk in and say ‘I have a contract signed by Saddam Hussein and I want to be paid,’ and they’re going to have a claim that is recognized under international law,” Baker said outside court. “We think this is a debt incurred by Saddam Hussein that deserves much more priority than some French oil contract.”

Ret. Col. David Eberly, who was held by the Iraqis for more than 40 days, said the government’s effort to void the ruling is disappointing. “Today, the argument boils down to the fact that the government simply wants to say ‘thank you very much for your service and now go home and live forever the horrors and the memories of your captivity and the torture that went on.”’ he said. “I think that’s unjust.”

....snip....

U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts sided with the POWs last summer and ordered payment of $653 million in compensatory damages and $306 million in punitive damages. But the Justice Department stepped in and said the POWs could not have access to any of the $1.7 billion of Iraqi assets frozen in 1990. It argued that President George W. Bush formally seized those assets after the invasion of Iraq last year and that the money would be used for rebuilding the country. Judge Roberts reluctantly agreed that the government had the right to block those funds from being used.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soccerchica Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just like them
they totally dont care about the vets that have HONESTLY served this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. At the very least, those guys deserve somethin
The Bush guys are not very compassionate after all.

More like exploitors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kispoko Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. yep
there was a story in the local paper about this, as a local family's son was affected by bush halting the judgement....


these people were lifelong republicans, and they are *still* holding onto their illusions about the republican party, more specifically the bush administration.... this denial to their son admittedly only makes the coming election a "difficult decision" for them, not a clear cut one. and why might that be? well apparently, they still are of the belief that there's a strong chance president bush didn't know anything about this, because he's "too busy," and that if he did, they'd like to think he would uphold the award.

unbelievable right? *shakes head*


what's it going to take for people to realize this cartel is all about money, power, and themselves? granted, the judgement was way too high, but that doesn't mean they have to block an award entirely.... how many times do they have to fuck over military personnel and veterans for some people to 'get it?' apparently, some are so entirely entrenched in reverie about this administration that they can't even disabuse themselves of such illusory notions when they fuck over their own son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "what's it going to take for people to realize this cartel is all about
money, power and themselves?"

It's going to take people changing their own behavior from being all about money, power and themselves.

Conservatism is the path of least resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC