slor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:23 PM
Original message |
| Why are only "parts" of the PDB released... |
|
I heard it was only one page anyway so doofus could understand it.
|
| ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| doni_georgia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 7. They showed one typed page |
|
ABC reported that a portion of the PDB was released - so there was more to it that wasn't released. They showed it on the news. top right hand corner showed "Declassified release date 4/10/04." About four names of individuals or countries had been blacked out. Still it had to be retyped to add info at top. How do we know it's the actual article?
|
| dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that what they are releasing is the actual PDB and not something Rove and the gang typed up last night?
|
| JBoris
(675 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I’ve only seen highlights and excerpts from this document. anyone have a link to the full document?
|
| mike1963
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. NBC news just showed a copy, there were only a few words "redacted" |
|
some name, apparently. It's a smoking gun anyway.
|
| Options Remain
(475 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
If it actually had damaging info in it they would not have given in to release it that quickly. I smell a trap actually.
TearForger
|
| trumad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. not have given in to release it that quickly |
|
LOL....What...2 years not enough?
|
| VolcanoJen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-10-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. Well, the PDB specifically mentions WASHINGTON and NEW YORK. |
|
Condi left out that little tidbit when referring to her "historical information document."
The WH didn't bow to public pressure. The WH bowed to the fact that the the PDB has been leaked all over Washington since late Friday, and likely the Washington Post or the New York Times were going to go with their version of the PDB on Sunday...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
