Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bu**sh** lie about calling for the Aug. 6 PDB?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:23 AM
Original message
Did Bu**sh** lie about calling for the Aug. 6 PDB?
Several times during his recent press conference, Bush emphasized that he was the one to request the infamous presidential briefing on Aug. 6. Rice also kept insisting on the president's active role in her testimony. But it seems likely that this explanation is purely an alibi made up to cover their negligence after the fact. Fred Kaplan has a great article in Slate:

The official story about the PDB is that the CIA prepared it at the president's request. Bush had heard all Tenet's briefings about a possible al-Qaida attack overseas, the tale goes, and he wanted to know if Bin Laden might strike here. This story is almost certainly untrue. On March 19 of this year, Tenet told the 9/11 commission that the PDB had been prepared, as usual, at a CIA analyst's initiative. He later retracted that testimony, saying the president had asked for the briefing. Tenet embellished his new narrative, saying that the CIA officer who gave the briefing to Bush and Condi Rice started by reminding the president that he had requested it. But as Rice has since testified, she was not present during the briefing; she wasn't in Texas. Someone should ask: Was that the only part of the tale that Tenet made up? Or did he invent the whole thing—and, if so, on whose orders?

The distinction is important. If Bush asked for the briefing, it suggests that he at least cared about the subject; then the puzzle becomes why he didn't follow up on its conclusions. If he didn't ask for the briefing, then he comes off as simply aloof. (It's a toss-up which conclusion is more disturbing.)

http://slate.msn.com/id/2098861/

There also is evidence that the end of the briefing, which concluded with the mitigating reassurance that some 70 separate FBI investigations were pursuing the case, was not only exaggerated at best but may have been added after Aug. 6. Later versions given to the 9/11 committee, verbatim copies to other agencies, do not include any mention of ongoing FBI investigations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very Interesting.
I still don't think that they released the WHOLE THING. Aren't most PDB's 2-3+ pages long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. they are usually much longer than that
they've been dumbed down for our illiterate, attention-impaired idiot "president"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Actually a one-and-a-half-page PDB is considered very long
Larry Johnson, the outspoken former CIA analyst and counterterrorism
official at the State Department, was on MSNBC commenting to PDBs, of which he had written more than a hundred. He said they are drastically simplified and are almost never longer than a page. He said the Aug. 6 brief would have stood out as unusually extensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I guess Larry Johnson didn't work for Clinton?
Besides when the title was leaked last October, the length of the document was also leaked. This report claimed that this particular PDB was eleven and a half pages long. Since the leak had the title exactly right, then I would assume the rest of their information was accurate, also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalParadise Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I wonder about the 11-page statement
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_04/003701.php

Article from Kevin Drum about the memo, pretty interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. that is NOT what I read
not at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. did his lips move?
if so, then he was lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ben-Veniste Read Tenet's Letter Explaining Who Requested...
Hint, It wasn't Bush...

I don't have the transcript of that yet but it was Ben-Veniste reading the letter that Tenet wrote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. wellll, he's not lying about SEX, so there's nothing to be concerned about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baronessniki Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. He doesn't have sex, so what is your point?
Maybe if half the Republicans would get laid we wouldn't be at war now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRunner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe he confused it with the Cary Condit briefing?
"Bush did mention Rice at the session -- but only to say that she and White House counselor Karen Hughes had "briefed" him on the Chandra Levy matter after the two aides watched then-Rep. Gary A. Condit's television interview about the missing intern."
<snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A2676-2004Apr10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Get OUT!!!!
This can't be true!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRunner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. It's sad. But true.
Now we know where his attention was in August, 2001!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. "he comes off as simply aloof" ??????????????
Aloof? How 'bout simply a blatant, self-serving liar?

Defrauding the country of honest service, he deserves removal.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Probably
he lies about everything else, so why not this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is another part of the story that needs to come out --
thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. of course it is a big fat f***ing lie
everyone knows it; it just has to be PROVEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Confused?
I don't know whether he asked for it or not, but if the CIA had information on Bin Laden attacking the US, shouldn't he have brought it to the president's attention anyway? Isn't that his job, or does the president need to make a specific request for information? Not to stick up for * or Tenet, but can we please put some competent people in office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. our "president" doesn't give a shit
he was too busy vacationing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. help with info
Yesterday at the hearing Tenet stated that he did not brief w during the month of August. He said he was in DC and w was in Crawford. Today on hate radio I heard Tenet corrected himself and said he did brief w during August 2001. Is that true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I t was a slick way of not having to answer questions
from the 9-11 Commission about what those briefing were about. First you say you didn't have any, and then you change you're story as soon as you walk out the door? Sorry, this is total bullshit. Tenet needs to be recalled by the commission, cause he's got some explaining to do.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Seems like parsing of words to me: What does "ask" mean?
Edited on Thu Apr-15-04 07:04 PM by linazelle
I believe that Bush's claim is classic Clinton-speak. See, I think Condi or somebody presented the PDB to Bush and at that time he said: "Lemme see it." Therefore, technically, he ASKED for it.

Now, if you are talking about ordering the PDB, that's a WHOLE other story. I don't believe Bush ordered the PDB. He was not on top of this at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC