Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Actor's HIV Infection Strikes Calif. Porn Industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:48 PM
Original message
Actor's HIV Infection Strikes Calif. Porn Industry
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=638&ncid=762&e=1&u=/nm/20040415/en_nm/leisure_porn_dc

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - California's multi-billion-dollar adult porn industry ground to a virtual halt on Thursday after a popular actor tested positive for the virus that causes AIDS (news - web sites).

Industry advocates immediately called for a 60-day moratorium on filming so that others could be tested.

Actor Darren James tested positive for HIV (news - web sites) on Wednesday in screening conducted routinely on the industry's 1,200 regular actors by the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare (AIM) Foundation, the foundation's Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell (news) said.

They must show negative tests to keep working in the industry, Mitchell said, adding that only about 17 percent of performers use condoms.

James, the first porn actor to test positive for the virus since 1999, had a "stellar record" of tests -- negative every three weeks for the past seven years, she said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. *sigh* 17 percent
No one ever learns. They should have learned from John Holmes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not to hijack the thread, but...
Have you seen "Wonderland" with Val Kilmer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, and I thought it captured the depravity of the situation perfectly
Kilmer was dead on, as Holmes was a dumb as a board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought it was really good too
Kilmer isn't all over the place like some actors, but when he does surface, he usually lays down a memorable performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You would enjoy his performance in Spartan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, how convenient
More fuel for the *anti-pr0n* zealots' fire...:eyes: :tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, that's one more unemployed
Damn you, Bill Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well I am glad they test, for the actors sakes.
But I remember reading somewhere quite a ways back that it can take HIV 6-12 months to show up in a test after the person has been exposed. I don't know if that is true or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chefgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I was told a while back...
I dont know how valid this info still is, but I had a blood transfusion in 1981, and a few years later, when they started to realize it had been in the blood supply, I was told that incubation could be as long as 10 years!
I was tested religiously for about 5 years, and then decided I was going to drive myself crazy worrying about it, and since I didnt engage in any other high risk behavior, I gave up being tested. Figured if I had gotten it from the transfusion, there was nothing I could do about it, and if I was going to get sick, I would know soon enough.
Got myself tested last year again......still negative...thank God...looks like I'm in the clear.
Very scary and odd feeling, to have to think about it as a possible reality. It's a disease I wouldn't wish on anyone.


-chef-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EDT Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder how they keep herpes, G. warts, etc... under control-
As anyone who sees even a little porn knows, condoms aren't usually a part of it, and I think of all the other diseases these people could spread before they knew it. Plus, condoms don't always stop the other diseases either.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The actors have their own logic
They say the reason they fell safe is that they only sleep with each other. I find that remarkably short-sighted since it would only take one "outsider" to bring them all down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Was that Darren James or James Darren?
James Darren is a Republican and that's pretty pornographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC