Good morning.
I just read a fascinating article in the LA TIMES about the reopening of a 1949 case (us v. reynolds) that basically set the legal precedence for the military/US govt to assert privilege without judicial oversight if they claim 'national security or state secrets' are at risk.
Turns out that over 50 years after the US Supreme Court granted that executive privilege, that the papers the govt would not turn over to the plaintiffs under the claim that it would jeopardize 'national security', have been declassified.
And guess what? The Air Force lied. There were no state secrets in an accident report. There was no issue of a risk to national security.
Long story short (the article, part 1, is 13 pages long in my word processor), the daughter of an engineer killed in a b29 accident has filed a request with the USSC to reopen the matter. Problem is, they had to file a motion asking the USSC for special leave to hear their argument on revisiting this executive privilege case. Knowing our present USSC, they will probably deny their motion.
But I suggest that this case warrants a review by the USSC. The govt got out of providing accident info without any judicial review whatsoever of the basis for their claim to NOT provide information to harmed citizens. And this has been the precedence since the early 1950s.
This plays into the bush admin's CONSTANT claim of "we can't tell you jack shit because of national security."
I love the Jersey Girls; I yes I do. But their grievances against the USA are hanging on THIS case... this case that will determine the fate of everyone given the Patriot Act mentality of our govt.
I mean, look at those absurd 28 redacted pages in the congressional jt comm investigation of 911. The bush administration claims ONLY that it would 'embarrass' another country. And those papers remain classified to this day!!!
We must write LTTEs, talk to our friends (and foes), campaign for the democrats, do everything we can to oust the occupiers of the white house. BUT I also think we need to pay very, very close attention to the reopening of US v. Reynolds in the Supreme Court, and make sure it gets heard, but MORE that we get this case HIGHLIGHTED in the public eye! Don't let the S.Ct screw us again.... it will be so easy for them to just DENY the motion to rehear the matter, and no one will be the wiser.
A new ruling in this case would clip the executive's feathers big time.
And, you know, I honestly think Sandra Day O'Connor has this intense desire to clip some of the feathers of the thugs she installed into the white house.
Here is the link to the article (it's on yahoo today, so you don't need to register with the LA TIMES (part 2 comes out tomorrow.....which will probably go into more detail of HOW the US govt lied):
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/latimests/20040418/ts_latimes/howthedeathofjudysfathermadeamericamoresecretive&e=4***note, the article reads like a wonderful novel.... great sunday morning reading!!! Can't believe it was written by a staff writer! The guy should get a pulitzer.
***2nd note: I will go through the article and post some relevant snips...back soon!