Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:27 PM
Original message
Why Bush?
Okay, assuming that the entire administration is just an attempt (and so far a successful one) at a neocon power-grab, why would they pick George W. Bush as their face. I realize that he's easy to manipulate but there are others who can be easily manipulated as well. Why not Collin Powell or Denny Hastert? At least they can actually make articulate speaches and don't have histories that include DWIs, AWOL, and cocaine usage. It just doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because he doesn't seem like the type to do it, does he?
In many ways, it's ingeneous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. His name is B-U-S-H
If you know anything about Shrub's loser business career (closet payoffs from Poppie's buddies), you know he was selected because of his name. He's a M-A-R-I-O-N-E-T-T-E.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Name recognition = votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gyopsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've thought about this
It doesn't make any sense to me either. The guy is a moran. You would figure the repukes could get some evil big brain behind the operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He isn't the brain, only the body
The brain is Dick Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush is a big name.
He was a governor with a big name from a big state. That's why they chose him. He was the golden child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddzilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. People voted for him in texas thinking he was his father..
seriously...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's Reagan redux
With George W. Bush, like Reagan, the CONs needed a front man, who was:
1. Not Too Bright
2. Affable, at least on the surface
3. Pliable, would do what he was told, and
4. Could put the best face on (i.e., gull the public into buying) policies which he himself didn't understand and which they otherwise would not accept.
Like Reagan, the CONs have carefully stage-managed him, surrounded him with imperial trappings, have covered him with a "mystique", and have given him a smart, ruthless vice-president who is the real power behind the throne. That Dumbass is the son of Reagan's VP (himself the center of the cabal) is just a very large bonus, and guarantees his subservience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. That sounds like the plan, except that even with help, he fails.
I keep thinking it was a mistake on the puppetmasters' part to choose Bush over whoever else was in the running, and that he or Rove or Poppy had some dirt or specific advantage that led them to back him. He makes a damn fool of himself on a regular basis, and his off-the-cuff remarks piss off half the world. Surely they have better dimwits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. He brought the fundamentalist Christian base.
That, I think, is hugely important.

Can you see another candidate doing that as well for the neocons?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Orrin Crotch perhaps...
But they would've lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's all about his perceived incompetency...
I think the guy is ultimately willing to be the fallguy for the entire neocon agenda, should it come to that, claiming incompetency pleading for mecry all the way (and probably getting it too). Quite Clever actually...we're really not dealing with amatures here. This isn't even really thier very first shot at this song'n'dance, if you think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthPrevails Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Because a smart president would not have approved the PNAC agenda
The PNACers had their grand vision of empire way before Bush. They tested their idea on Clinton with an open letter. President Clinton, like any wise man, saw through this scam. PNAC is not in the best interest of USA. It is a national defense plan for Israel.

The PNAC hawks were quite disappointed that they could not convince Clinton and made sure the next victim they chose, was dumb. Bush was dumb and religious. They couldn’t have found a better candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. Because Cheney could not have won
And none of the core group is at all likeable. Bush really isn't either. But he had the name recognition going for him.

Plus, he somehow managed to make enough stupid people in this country think that he was a normal, average guy (with alcohol and cocaine abuse problems) who they could "have a beer with".

And, best of all, Bush seems to have no sense of morality, which is perfect for this group. So, he wouldn't object to the many terrible deeds that this administration has comitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. He's a facade, a diversion
Cheney, Perle, Armitage, Rummy, or Wolfowitz as poster kids? No. When you are Cons, when lying is the highest form of morality, you never show your true face.

In addition to being a simpleton with politically compatible delusions of divinity, Chimpy was rather well connected with elements of a political machine capable of seizing state power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. You said it yourself
He's easy to manipulate. He's supposedly "likable" and "genuine" (hey this is what others use to describe him - not me). He thinks in very simplistic terms, which many uninformed and ignorant people can relate to.

He's openly anti-intellectual and dislikes thought. Anyone that thinks too much is an "elite".

He's also a "good Christian", whose favorite political philosopher is Jesus.

Basically, they knew he would appeal to the base (and he's extremely popular among the religious fanatics) and could probably convince enough people that he actually gave a shit about them.

Many of that latter group have learned their lesson. They thought he was a "compassionate conservative" ( whatever the hell that means...it's a freakin oxymoron).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. Because they misunderestimated his ineptitude
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. i have no clue
anyone, a-n-y-o-n-e, even i could do a better job. he is the least qualified person to ever hold that office.

my personal crackpot theory: they owed daddybush a favor for some very nasty shit he's orchestrated over the years, involving mass murders and covert operations. (jfk)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC