Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice vs Woodward. Who do you believe?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:33 AM
Original message
Rice vs Woodward. Who do you believe?
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 06:33 AM by keithyboy
A proven liar or the PNAC journalist shill?
Not much of choice is it?
I'll go with Woodward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. woodward...

...in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jivenwail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:36 AM
Original message
Woodward
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thats a no brainer!
Woodward of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. no brainer - woodward (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. do you even have to ask...
There was a day when I had respect for Rice but after the 9/11 hearings, her constant "Rove" bull-rush at anyone criticizing the boy emperor and all the revelations about how slow she was before 9/11 to make terrorist attacks a priority, I don't even pity her anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddy22600 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Woodward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. neither
The truth is much worse than we know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Woodward
And he learned his lesson well from Watergate . He has tapes to back up his interviews Of course there is more info. that will surface from the mire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Condi has NO credibility. At least Woodward has a conscience...
he put his money where his mouth is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dog and pony show to put $700 m treason on table to be ignored
before we get close to election.

The Reagan Treason was similiar with Contra monies - and our press ran away, saying Reagan's Justice Department would chase if a law was broken - yeah, right.

Now Woodward is smirking that he is not a lawyer - he is just reporting - as Rove gets this possible bad political fact out of the way early in the game.

I expect a few - "of course he planned for Iraq war, he would be impeachable if he had not", and "As Commamder in Chief he can move monies about to save the United States (believe it our not - the Reagan GOP had this one going for 6 months as Dems pointed out the cost of a 600 mile taxi ride to the Texas border by a single Sandinista revolutionary). And I expect our media to kiss GOP ass again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
birdbrain Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. No, it doesn't
Condoleeza Rice is a serial liar, and a traitor to the true values on which America was founded. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Hi birdbrain!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. What do you mean? If you're impling that Rice will not..
be believed because she is a black woman you couldn't be more wrong. Rice will not be believed because she is a proven liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Implied rascism is
not in keeping with the times. Get real. Slavery, the Holocaust, Women's Rights and all those evil societal ills does not an honest person make. Skin color or gender is no argument for a person's personal ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Except for Condi...The WH hasn't denied not telling Powell..
"Ms. Rice, who appeared on three of the Sunday morning news programs, denied that Mr. Bush had kept Mr. Powell in the dark about the president's thinking on a possible invasion of Iraq.

In his book, Mr. Woodward said that at the request of Mr. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, even briefed Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Washington, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, on the American war plans two days before telling Mr. Powell.

Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld used a top-secret war map, supposedly off-limits to foreigners, to describe the administration's plan, the book contends."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. look at the transcript
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 12:36 PM by grasswire
Schieffer: So he (Powell) knew that Bandar was being told?

"Rice: So he -- we -- I certainly knew, and I suspect that Colin would not have been surprised going through the Gulf War experience that one of the allies that you had to be certain understood what might happen if the president decided to go to war was the Saudis."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Does Condi live at the FAUX studio or is there a FAUX studio in the
in the White House?

Anyone that goes on FAUX News as much as Condi does can be too creditable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. woodward...
...for the past 30 years he's gone out of his way to uphold the tenants of journalism. A rarity in the US. He's worked very hard in his career to remain neutral, factual, and non-partisan in his work. He also works very hard to separate his personal beliefs when in the voting booth from his work in public as a reporter and editor.

Woodward is one of the best journalists ever, and he's a treasure to have in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC