Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source for job loss?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rocktop15 Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:11 AM
Original message
Source for job loss?
I need to find a good source that says there were around 3 million jobs lost under Bush. I'm doing a speech for this. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. You could try here, this SHOULD be the official source
http://www.bls.gov/bls/employment.htm

but it is a gov't agency, so its either scrubbed, spun or obfuscated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's one....
Actually, they're saying 2.7 million jobs lost. Hope this helps...

http://www.jobwatch.org/

Keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Remember that is private sector jobs lost
since the government employment increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Payroll survey links below - Greenspan says other (household) data is bad
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.toc.htm

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

http://www.bls.gov/ces/cesbtabs.htm

You will find that the Bush shortfall - after adding the new 300000 temp jobs in March (no increase in full time jobs was recorded in the payroll survey in March) is down to about 2 million jobs.

The 62.4% of the population employed that we had under Clinton, will take, as the population expands, a great deal more time than Bush would obtain if he won the 04 election (more than 4 years awarded to the winner in 04, even assuming EVERY month had job increases of more than 300000).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC