Who's the better peacemaker? (If you had to choose.)

[Onlooker]

[Az]

1. But I don't have to choose

Not between them anyway.

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

2. Wow

If I had to chose between these two, I'd just save myself the time and kill myself.

[laruemtt]

3. i respectfully decline to choose....

[lutherj]

4. That's a choice?

[bkcc]

5. worse than choosing between

firing squad and lethal injection

yikes.

[Skinner]

6. Um, that's a prettly lame choice.

You should at least give us a "none of the above" option.

[demnan]

7. I couldn't choose

because they are both the same.

[muriel_volestrangler]

8. How the hell should we know?

Neither has ever attempted to make peace, so they're both unknown quantities.

[onehandle]

9. Sharon has fewer nukes.

That's about the only way to call this one.

[Renew Deal]

10. If those are the choices...

Build the fucking bunkers and hide the children.

[library_max]

11. That's like asking, "Which is the better apertif?

Paint remover or drain cleaner?"

[Beacho]

12. no friggin' way

That's like asking who's the better humanitarian, Stalin or Pol Pot?

[Mz Pip]

13. They are both thugs.

I suppose both want peace, but only if it suits their best interests and is on their terms.

Sort of like asking if you perfer hanging or a firing squad.

MzPip
:dem:

[GreenPartyVoter]

14. Me. I can do a better job than those thugs.