Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's what I think the Bushies are doing with regards to Woodwards's book

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:27 PM
Original message
Here's what I think the Bushies are doing with regards to Woodwards's book
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 08:22 PM by glarius
They think that most of the people who vote for Bush won't read the book anyway, so they are giving it a thumbs up....Several Republican talking heads have been on CNN already, saying except for minor disagreements, it's a good book...That way they think that their faithful flock will think it must be alright or the Republicans wouldn't be recommending it.....Does this make sense?

edidt:It's 9:20PM....I'm watching woodward on Larry King....He's giving a whole different slant on his book here than what I saw on 60 Minutes...What a phony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely. Its called mass manipulation. Hitler was very good at it
too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DEMVET-USMC Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Shrubs and Hitler
Go to < www.tarpley.net > for the Shrub and Walker families` histories as to THE HITLER PROJECT. Click the Shrub BIO and then chapter 2 THE HITLER PROJECT. ....Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. No character assasination of Woodward.
They have realized that accepting the book will make it
and the issues melt like snow in the hot sun. Attacking Woodward
would be counter productive. Powell and Woodward worked this all out rom the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. hmmmm, so why was Rush screaming about it today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemlake Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. What did he say?
I couldn't force myself to listen to that trash, so maybe you could fill us in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Heh... I refuse to "soil my beautiful mind" ~~chortle~~
However, there were a couple of threads about it, so I'm just curious why the assertion would be that everyone was comfy with Woodward.

Jes' wonderin'

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or maybe, stuff that bothers DU-ers just make the base love W more
Have you tried to get in their mindset? Righteous W, wanting to liberate the world, listening to the higher daddy in the sky! tears in his eyes, talk with God - only days after the elitist liberal press attacked him so badly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. don't forget dissing Powell
the neo-cons hate Powell, so that story a big plus to them.

You are right about the appeal to the Pat Robertson crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You are right. Unless Congress starts squeaking...which they won't
Woodward's book is irrelevant except to the true lovers of freedom and justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly
Noticed the same thing, they are saying .."it is a good book but we just have minor disagreements".

They know that they can't smear Woodward, it would be too obvious and they can't say he is lying, they have already used both strategies too much with the others like Clarke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They don't WANT to smear Woodward -- he works for them. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Bartlett is already on record saying that Woodward lied
Edited on Mon Apr-19-04 08:32 PM by tridim
The 700 million, the Saudi war plan sharing and the oil price fixing, all lies according to Bush spokesman, Bartlett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I MEANT TO DO THAT
Remember when Pee Wee Herman fell off of his bike in front of all of his friends after showing off (From Pee Wee's Big Adventure). After Pee Wee landed most ungracefully on the ground at the feet of his friends, he looked up and said, "I meant to do that." In this example, Bush is playing the part of Pee Wee. We, the masses, are the people watching.

This book sucks so bad for the WH, they are trying a Clinton trick (only Clinton is better, smarter, and on the right (meaning left, of course) side of things. They try to turn around bad news to make it appear to be good news. Except they are such goombas,they can't do it. I'm sure they are real excited about the revelation that Bush negotiated with our good friends, the Hi-Jackers, I mean Saudis, to doctor oil prices to keep Bush in office. AGGGGGGGGGHHHHHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Bushies?
Uh...that makes these nutjobs appear cute. How about using Bushites instead? btw the word shite means shit in the UK. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I am developing a liking for "bushbots".
Connotes mindless, unthinking automatons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC