Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, as I gather it, a Saudi Prince was briefed about Iraq war plans before

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 08:50 AM
Original message
So, as I gather it, a Saudi Prince was briefed about Iraq war plans before
The US Secretary of State?

The administration of George W. Bush aka The War President has harmed US and is getting a lot of people killed through following the policies of the failed Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war and PNAC.

Anti-Americanism has risen since this mismanaged administration took over and went to war on terrorism, something is rotten when a Saudi Prince is informed about the gravest decision a US President can make, taking US to war-based on selective neo-conservative dominated intelligence gathered quickly to boost the illusion of a decision being made, intelligence that Sect. Powell, at first reading, exclaimed something about not delivering "bullshit" to the UN and was reported initially not going to deliver the speech he did deliver for George W. Bush aka The War President who held a war briefing for a Saudi Prince but not the US Sect. of State.

Consider LIHOP, then that make sense, corruption and crimes blanketed by that old "national security" whitewash by neo-conservative traitors imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bizarre, isn't that?
And they are making it all "Why was he informed first?" instead of "Why was he informed AT ALL?!?!?" What is a Saudi Prince doing looking at our war plans, clearly marked not-for-foreign-officials?!?!? Throw that point around a bit, please :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Add in the mercenary factor of The War President, guns for hire
paid for with our taxes-the use of mercenaries really endangers US military and they are actually helping to further the case of Osama Bin Laden and ultimately raise anti-American feelings worldwide, aren't those high crimes and misdemeanors???????????????

It boggles the mind, at first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. combine that little gem with the twenty odd redacted pages (9/11)
presumbably concerning Saudi Arabia......how many sledgehammers to the head will it take to wake people up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddy22600 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, according to the Sec of State
Powell helped write the plan and put the finishing touches on it. So, he would have had to brief himself on the plan. Powell knew about it long before the Saudi prince did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why was a foreigner given access to documents stamped NOFOR?
That's the real question, not whether Powell saw them before or after or at all. I love how the bush cabal is trying very hard to make everyone focus on the red herring of timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. US military was present, who were they? Was CIA also present?
Franks? Meyers? Rumsfeld? Wolfowitz? Where was Cheney? Who briefed the Saudi prince?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. We know Meyers was there, he agreed that Woodward's version...
was correct. Cheney was there according to Woodward's version, with the permission of bush, rofl, like Cheney would even ask his puppet's "permission".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9.  Ever have questions, as a US citizen that grew up during the Cold War,
about the behavior of USAF on 9-11-2001? I know that military careers were determined by response time to possible US air-space threats-they even scrambled for UFO's, why not multiple airliners attacking-they had plans for that too.

General Meyers came out of US Space Command, didn't he? A lot of US Space Command folks surround Rumsfeld, lots of Air Force blue around the Secretary of Defense (defense, not Bush Doctrine)lots of questions about their performance on 9/11, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, and the white house is proud of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Excuse me, but wouldn't this be considered Treason?
I am confused as to why this matter is being treated so lightly by the powers that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC