Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland Security warns of Net attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:27 AM
Original message
Homeland Security warns of Net attack
Homeland Security warns of Net attack

Carrie Kirby, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 21, 2004



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Department of Homeland Security issued an alert Tuesday warning that "a large segment of the Internet community" could be knocked offline by a newly discovered vulnerability that would allow attacks on a core technology behind the global network.

Such an attack could take down whole Internet service providers by temporarily shutting down communications between computers on the network, said the warning from the United States-Computer Emergency Readiness Team, a partnership between the department and Carnegie Mellon University.

British authorities warned about the vulnerability earlier Tuesday. ISPs have been scrambling to protect themselves against the danger, but "the threat is ongoing," said Jeff Havrilla, an Internet security expert with the U.S. partnership


more.. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/04/21/BUGHT686KU1.DTL&type=tech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. God forbid they interrupt the Justice Dept. and FBI
from rifling through every website you've ever visited and reading every email you've sent in the last few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Got my duct tape but I need a color
How am I supposed to know what to do without colors? Is this orange, blue, green, plaid, WTF? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. LOL! Good one, music...
Love it!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. so, they anticipate viruses/hackers to fly into our Internet?
but, what are they doing about it ... without, of course, curtailing our privacy and cyberspace rights?

for the most secretative mal-administration ever, they do seem to do a lot of their evildoings in broad daylight ... telling us about Internet attacks and November election attacks it's likely to happen ... Bush* did shut down Somalia's internet in 2001, and as far as it's known, they're still down ...

... they don't want us networking truth ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Do you have any links to that story?
That is one I missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Homeland Security is nothing but a PR department
This is not a 'new' TCP flaw. I've done a lot of reading about it the last couple of days, and it's just the same old 'man-in-the-middle' attack that your manual pages warned you about.

The ease in which Watson is able to guess the TCP sequence number for packets going to and from Cisco routers is more of a Cisco flaw than anything else.

There has been a technological solution to this problem in the form of an upgraded protocol called 'IPv6', which makes it much, much harder to spoof packets (make them appear to come from somewhere else). Most of the internet currently uses the older 'IPv4'.

It will take a very large scale coordinated effort to actually MOVE the internet to predominately using IPv6. It's very much like switching the foundation of a house after it's been built. In fact, it's just the sort of massive effort that a government entity could actually facilitate.

Of course, since the Dept. of Homeland Security is a PR firm at the beck and call of the Bush administration's corporate backers, they will do nothing of the sort. Mandating a switch to IPv6 in any sort of time frame would cost corporations money, and provide no benefit other than safety and security, which to date they haven't seen as really worth it (proof of this: Many of them are still using Windows servers).

To sum up: This press release 'warning' is the Department of Homeland Security trying to look busy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. They just read Richard Clarke's last memo (from 2002)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. this realated to the tcp flaw?
somebody just figured out that tcp (transmission control protocol) - the protocol used to route traffic around the net - could be exploited to make routers either confused as to where the traffic should go and not deliver, or it could route to the wrong site if spoofed properly.


but then again, the whole Internet has been crying chiken little ever since it got big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. how convenient. Trying to shut up the people's dissent.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fort Worth Cowboy Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh great more warnings
:eyes: These are getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC