Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Correctness Poll Volume 4

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:18 AM
Original message
Poll question: Political Correctness Poll Volume 4
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 12:09 PM by bryant69
This might be the last one. But maybe not.

Anyway same drill as yesterdays; here's a statement, tell me whether you agree with it or not.

"Political Correctness is largely a hoax, designed to render the expression of liberal ideas or the criticism of conservatives ideas socially unacceptable."

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. the term 'Political Correctness' is an attempt by the right
to portray basic human decency and respect as a negative perpetrated by liberals. Liberalism is morally and ethically superior to conservatism. They know this and are trying to make it appear as if hatred, bigotry, selfishness and greed are desirable traits, family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd agree with your definition more than the one posted.
Decrying 'political correctness' is the conservatives way of saying they want to be able to tell ethnic jokes and sexually harass women without getting fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. More than that
They want to do those things without even being criticized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. While I agree that the right wing uses PC as a stick
to bash liberals with, I have had some experience with the less pleasant aspects of PC. The example I like to trot out is this. I'm not making it up:

About ten years ago, I took a graduate class in Gender Theory at a major southern university. The class was team-taught by a man and a woman. The students were told, early in the semester, that we'd all do okay in the course, just as long as we could accept the fact that all men are responsible for subjugating all women.

I didn't think blanket statements like this were intellectually honest then and I don't think so now. The professors were pretty stoked about the notion, though.

Silliness like this has nothing whatsoever to do with liberalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. seems to get used as a stick
in a lot of situations, not just rightwingers. The concept, once institutionalized, loses its positive connotations. Forcing people to behave "ethically" or in a PC manner does NOT change the original negative viewpoints they may or may not hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Agree 100%
And another recent case in point is the Sierra Club election, where a lot of people bought the nonsense that Richard Lamm and David Pimentel are right-wingers or racists because they think immigration levels into the U.S. should be cut.

It seems to me that while the right wing likes to trot out accusations of political correctness to attack liberals, there really are some concrete examples of what they are talking about. Only, those concrete examples aren't real liberalism, they are examples of post-Sixties ultraleftism: Men are "penised people", ending "white male privilege" should guide all political actions, "all heterosexual sex is rape", calls to reduce immigration into the U.S. are "racist", "the Sierra Club was almost taken over by right-wingers waging a hostile takeover", we can stamp out sexism by spelling it "wimmin" or "womyn". All of these are ultraleftist hogwash and have nothing to do with liberalism, but they do give the right wing ammunition to tear us down with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. What does the term have to do with anything?
It's the concept that's important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't understand your poll.
It doesn't make sense.

If you're saying they just made up a word with a "negative connotation" to go along with the liberal ideas, so what? The ideas remain the same, and they are judged on their own merits.

Or are you saying that they actually augmented the liberal idea somehow, and it's become something that was not originally intended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The Later.
Perhaps I would have been better served to state "the threat of political correctness . . ." In other words when people talk about political correctness tehy are talkinga bout a problem that they believe exists; but is that problem real?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Political Correctness" is a Condensation symbol
Through strategic manipulation and persistent association, the phrase has become shorthand for a set of ideas. In this case, "Political Correctness" has been created into a symbol of discrimination and repression (deservedly or not). All the negative connotatations of political discrimination ahve been condensed into this phrase. For an interesting exploration on condensation symbols, see the writings of Political Scientist, Murray Edelman (especially "Politics as Symbolic Action" & "Political Language")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks for the tip
I'll look him up.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Voted: Neutral
Political correctness is a term and concept that originated in Maoism. Right wingers latched onto it sometime in the early 1990s to attack liberals but it ain't their puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, Maoism ain't this liberal's puppy either.
Liberalism does not equal communism or fascism, although many conservatives would like people to believe this.

The examples cited above of silly and repressive academic thinking are not examples of liberalism, either.

I've been exposed to attacks from extreme leftists, and I know that they can be just as vicious, backstabbing, and deceitful as the extreme right. It's not surprising to me that on occasion an individual will flop from one extreme to the other. Both realms are areas where critical thinking, tolerance, and open-minded dialogue are unwelcome.

Sadly, conservatives have managed to paint a lot of liberals with this ugly brush. I just knock the paint brush away when it gets close to me!

Liberal and Proud of It!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC