Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My take on the North Korean explosion today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:43 PM
Original message
My take on the North Korean explosion today
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 03:44 PM by sgr2
Ok, I believe that any rational individual understands that North Korea is a VERY dangerous threat. They can't be invaded. They can only be contained. It's a shame really, you should see some of the footage of N. Korean leader Kim Jong doing these patriotic rallies (Kind of like Cultural Revolution in China minus all the red). Not to mention impossible terrain, dozens of nuclear warheads, and the presumed capability to launch them into the western parts of mainland north america.

So, the Bush Administration and the State Department realized that the whole "Axis of Evil" and ignore them thing didn't work. They leaned on China for assistance. China has a considerable financial stake in N. Korea not initiating nuclear war on its borders. Does anyone realize how much money the Chinese are making these days?

So the Chinese tell Kim Jong to come to China. They figure they'll bribe him and he'll keep quiet for a few years. Well, crazy Kim Jong doesn't take the bait. Or he doesn't give up enough.

So they track his movements back into N. Korea when he leaves and blow up a train station just after he passes through it. Does anyone think that an explosion that rained debris down on a town 12 miles away was really a train accident?

That's my theory, China is sending a warning to Kim Jong.

Read this article carefully:

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20040422/D82429D80.html

(snips)
The secretive communist government in Pyongyang declared an emergency while cutting off international telephone lines to prevent details of the crash from leaking out, South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported.

The North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, had quietly passed by rail through the station as he returned from China before dawn some nine hours earlier. It was not clear what caused the crash, or if it was related to Kim's journey.

"The area around Ryongchon station has turned into ruins as if it were bombarded," Yonhap quoted witnesses as saying. "Debris from the explosion soared high into the sky and drifted to Sinuiju," a North Korean town on the border with China, it said.

China, which also confirmed Kim's visit, is North Korea's last major ally, and the countries' ruling communist parties boast of close ties. But while China's experiments with capitalism have transformed it into an economic dynamo, North Korea suffers chronic food shortages and depends on its larger neighbor for aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddy22600 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. nah, it was america not china
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Sorry, if that was so, N.K. would be throwing a fit
A military strike on a train station by the USA? Kim Jong would be jumping for joy screaming and yelling. A strike by China on the otherhand, he'd have to keep quiet.

You've got the wrong tinfoil hat on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe you got the wrong country
it might have been our very own spooks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. All I know is that today is 9/11 in NK
Not in a political, military, way - but in terms of the fact that 3000 lives were lost. The wives, husbands, mothers, fathers and children of 3000 human beings are today mourning their loss - and are just as traumatized as we were here in the US.

I sincerely hope that Kim doesn't believe he was a target of assassination in this tragedy - because he does, and he reacts out of vengeance - the lust of vengeance that many felt after 9/11 - there's no telling what he might do.

Does any know if Bush has said anything about this catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and 3000 is a whole higher percentage of the NK
population than the US. Someone did the maths and pointed out that the moque bombing in Iraq were a greater percentage of the iraq population that 9/11 was for the US.

my question to all of this: what kind of fuel were these trains carrying, exactly? Gasoline isn't THAT explosive, and diesel certainly isn't. aviation grade, maybe?

either way, allow me to repeat my original thought on hearing this: fucking bastards. that's my respone to any bad news these days, especially concerning explosions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. what kind of fuel ?
liquified gas according to report I heard.

very VERY nasty stuff.... kinda like a nuke without the radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. if this was an assasination attempt, China would be the top candidate
but I don't think they'd miss him by 9 hours. And the CIA wouldn't either for all you ridiculous tinfoilers.

Furthermore, China seems like they'd eliminate him in a more clean manner, such as a sniper. This would probably be blamed on rebels or an attempted coup by someone in the NK government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. really, well I have another idea
what if this was only to scare him? he's a pithy little man who likes his pleasures, and this might be to put the fear of god into him. sorta like the fish in the newspaper: we can get close engouh to you to kill you, now pay attentino. of course, if he does, in fact, get all antsy and start sword rattling, it's a good thing we've got that missile defense system, right?

hey, wait a minute...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. A Warning That KILLS 3000 & Destroys The Railway Needed For Food Supplies?
not likely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. what better warning?
dost thou believe that the government of the PRC gives a flying fuck about a couple of thousand North Koreans?

There isa long and not-so-glorious history of countries using warning shots like this. the US dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a WARNING to Tokyo that they were next. The Allies bombed Dresden as a warning to Berlin. Germany leveled Warsaw as a warning to anyone who would oppse them.

sorry to disillusion you, but this is not particularly new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walmartsucks Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Actually
The allies devestated Dresden because of the nonstop, indiscriminate bombing of England that went on for what must have seemed like an eternity to those who lived there. They were really pissed when they finally achieved air superiority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. What's the source for his having passed by nine hours earlier?
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 04:12 PM by Minstrel Boy
Kim Jong Il's movements are not precisely telegraphed.

As far as I can see, none of the reports are actually from North Korea. Not surprising, given the nature of the state. But what do we know with certainty? Virtually all we know is coming through one South Korean reporter stationed in Beijing, who's been speaking with Chinese sources on the border, who had been speaking with relatives in Ryongchon before North Korea cut the international phone lines.

The Times of India says that the South Korean military was informed of the incident by an intelligence service hostile to the North.

The more I think about this, the less sure I am of what's happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I read somewhere it was an hour, not 9
But you're right, we're relying on Chinese reports for the most part, it's on the Chinese border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Wrong, the CIA missed OBL by 12 hours.
When Clinton tried to get OBL in the training camps in Afghanistan we missed by almost 12 hours. This stuff is harder than it looks it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe Dear Leader wants to retire
Edited on Thu Apr-22-04 03:58 PM by charlie
Y'know, "kill" himself and live the carefree life of a rich anonymous ex-despot :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Or maybe...
Plan 5030? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks , Good Link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. safety conditions
Given that safety conditions in North Korea simply don't exist (you think they have OSHA??) an accident is NOT out of the question. Like in the old Soviet Union worker's rigths and safety is simply not considered, only meeting Dear Leader's quotas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. You Know, Two Trains Collided In Penn Station The Other Day
shit happens. Especially in countries with rotting infrastructure, no money and probably no safety standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. My theory is there was something other than petro
on those trains. 12 miles of debris - no mention of the "accident" on N. Korean TV, international phone lines cut off - there was something that exploded for sure, but I don't think it was petro. An explosion that big should have been picked up by satelite photos. Be interesting to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steven_S Donating Member (810 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. a trainload of gasoline hits a trainload of LPG...
One bigass bomb.

I remember when a kid in a plumbing supply house dropped a 20-lb tank of LPG (propane) down the basement stairs.

The resultant explosion dropped the four-story building down on him.

Nasty stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC