Question regarding the state of the nation.

[burythehatchet]

Imagine that some evidence turns up that provides incontrovertible proof that the administration did the 9/11 attacks.

I'd be interested to learn what you believe would be the likely reaction of various right wing pundits.

So pick one: It could be Novakula (Douchebag for Liberty), Hume, Krauthammer, or one of your other fav's.

How would s/he react to the proof that Cheney, Perle and Chalabi were behind the attacks?

[7th_Sephiroth]

1. Rush:

Limbaugh: They did it cause jesus told them to start a holy war and to kill the muslims and other brown people

[burythehatchet]

2. Whinch of the other might possibly disagree with Rush?

[7th_Sephiroth]

3. i think that will be the excuse

bush uses when he gets caught

[burythehatchet]

4. that begs the question

what % of people are CERTAIN to accept it?

[7th_Sephiroth]

5. i think that might be

the straw that breaks the camels back and maybe just the 1% klan people

[politick]

6. not likely BUT

I think Brit Hume would be thre first to jump ship and see what's going on. I don't think hes an idealogue like the others. Novak would become second -- they're both opportunists who have more of an allegiance to money than to a politcal party.

I never watch TV, bu I can see a degree of fairness in Hume. Limbaugh has too much of an ego to ever admit he's wrong, even though I don't think he believes half the shit he spews --- somehow, I think, he's convinced himself he does. How else do you live with yourself?

[leftofthedial]

7. it would make virtually no difference to any of them.

if this truth came out, a neocon spin would come out with it and the media would parrot whatever it was.

I think many of thoswe blabbing propagandists for the neocons already know that the bushgang were complicit in 9-11. they don't care. They are on that team.

[burythehatchet]

8. I'm sure some of them suspect, but

they wouldn't dare touch it without hard evidence.