Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rising Corporate Military Monster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 07:41 AM
Original message
The Rising Corporate Military Monster
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0423-12.htm

The Rising Corporate Military Monster

by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

A corporate military monster is being created in Iraq.

The U.S. government is relying on private military contractors like never before.

Approximately 15,000 military contractors, maybe more, are now working in Iraq. The four Americans brutally killed and mutilated in Fallujah March 31 were part of this informal army of occupation.

Contractors are complicating traditional norms of military command and control, and challenging the basic norms of accountability that are supposed to govern the government's use of violence. Human rights abuses go unpunished. Reliance on poorly monitored contractors is bleeding the public treasury. The contractors are simultaneously creating opportunities for the government to evade public accountability, and, in Iraq at least, are on the verge of evolving into an independent force at least somewhat beyond the control of the U.S. military. And, as the contractors grow in numbers and political influence, their power to entrench themselves and block reform is growing.

Whatever the limitations of the military code of justice and its in-practice application, the code does not apply to the modern-day mercenaries. Indeed, the mechanisms by which the contractors are held responsible for their behavior, and disciplined for mistreating civilians or committing human rights abuses -- all too easy for men with guns in a hostile environment -- are fuzzy.

It is unclear exactly what law applies to the contractors, explains Peter W. Singer, author of Corporate Warriors (Cornell University Press, 2003) and a leading authority on private military contracting. They do not fall under international law on mercenaries, which is defined narrowly. Nor does the national law of the United States clearly apply to the contractors in Iraq -- especially because many of the contractors are not Americans.


..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly what I said in my latest flash movie
MURDER BY NUMBERS" Flash Movie (Re: Troop Coffins) by Symbolman

I call it, "MURDER BY NUMBERS" -it's based on the song by The Police..

This time they've gone TOO F*CKING FAR.. these troops BELONG to the AMERICAN PEOPLE and their families, they are NOT Bush's personal little ARMY GUYS..

Here's the url if you want to have a look, and pass it on to your neighbors..

Turn up those speakers!

this takes BUSH to TASK. AND his Old Man, the other Butcher of Bagdad.

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/murderby.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. another excellent
'flash' symbolman!

:toast:

**highly recommended, check this one out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting article.
I seem to recall that Rome had a problem when the silver mines flooded and they weren't able to pay their mercenaries.

What would happen if our economy tanked and we weren't able to pay our "contractors"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markomalley Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is inevitable and will not change...
...as long as we have politicians (both parties are guilty) who pursue a militaristic foreign policy, while wanting to shrink the size of the military that carries out that foreign policy.

Until we have people in office who have the courage to dramatically change the way we do business with others around the world, this problem will exist. It happened in the first Iraq war, the interwar period, and now. It happened in the Balkans, Haiti, etc. There are contractors working on every military post in the world. The only way to change this is by changing the fundamentals by which we do our foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. We created a military-industrial complex
and that brought us 2 generations of ever-increasing military expenditures.

Now we've created an immense mercenary force.

The MIC was satisfied that we should merely build and stockpile weapons. The Mercs will become an incredibly powerful lobby for using all those toys.

If you want constant war, institute a force that profits from war, and for whom peace is synonymous with hard times.

Where'd that goddam white rabbit go? Alice--Hey, Aaaaallllliiiice. Help! Get me out of here!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. say it loud
peace just does not pay for them. they are so vested in war it isn't funny. thank to bush jr, we must have constant "war footing" now.

btw, same with drugs/crime. another vast industry draining our budgets to support 'special interests'. reduction in drug addiction, reduction in crime just wouldn't pay for them. thanks to bush sr, we must have "war on drugs" forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't this fascism?
what else do you call it?

Corporate sponsored violence to protect or grab resources and investments

An end-around move from Congressional accountability

A dodge of the non-existent "check-and-balance" format of the US Constitution

An open example of how Republicans love "privatization" (no accountability along with high profit and waste) and hate government control (because government control means taking responsibility, being held accountable and waste is checked)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. it certainly is n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC