Where would Krugman get such an idea? :scared:
“If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.” – George W. Bush - December 18, 2000
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html "A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it," – George W. Bush - July 30, 2001
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2001/nf20010730_347.htmA Vision of Power
By PAUL KRUGMANPublished: April 27, 2004
here's a deep mystery surrounding Dick Cheney's energy task force, but it's not about what happened back in 2001. Clearly, energy industry executives dictated the content of a report that served their interests.
The real mystery is why the Bush administration has engaged in a three-year fight — which reaches the Supreme Court today — to hide the details of a story whose broad outline we already know.
One possibility is that there is some kind of incriminating evidence in the task force's records. Another is that the administration fears that full disclosure will highlight its chummy relationship with the energy industry. But there's a third possibility: that the administration is really taking a stand on principle. And that's what scares me.
<snip>
That same vision is apparent in many other actions. Just to mention one: we learn from Bob Woodward that the administration diverted funds earmarked for Afghanistan to preparations for an invasion of Iraq without asking or even notifying Congress.
What Mr. Cheney is defending, in other words, is a doctrine that makes the United States a sort of elected dictatorship: a system in which the president, once in office, can do whatever he likes, and isn't obliged to consult or inform either Congress or the public.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/27/opinion/27KRUG.html