fencesitter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-27-04 08:36 AM
Original message |
This Cheyney Energy Policy stonewall... |
|
I heard somewhere the grounds for executive privacy being argued for against releasing this information was identical to republican demands against the Clinton administration for the "Hillarycare" task force. The Clinton administration complied and handed over all requested. Is this true, did they take it to court? If the court said they had to turn over their documents, there's no argument? The law is what it is?
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-27-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. yoohoo-- the SCOTUS is hearing that very case this week eom |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-27-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. yoohoo-- the SCOTUS is hearing that very case today eom |
fencesitter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-27-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. OK, but did this go to court 10 years ago? |
|
With the Clinton health care policy? Sorry for my ignorance.
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-27-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. nope Clinton released the docs when the pressure was applied eom |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message |