Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Antonin Scalia openly and brazenly siding with Cheny

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:41 PM
Original message
Justice Antonin Scalia openly and brazenly siding with Cheny

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court appeared troubled Tuesday by the prospect of letting the public have a look into private White House policy meetings, a hopeful sign for the Bush administration's aggressive defense of secrecy in the case of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force.

The court is the latest stop in a nearly three-year fight over access to records of the task force that prepared a national energy strategy. The president put Cheney, a former energy industry executive, in charge and the group's recommendations were friendly to industries. Most stalled in Congress.

Raising the gravest concerns about unnecessary snooping into the executive branch was Justice Antonin Scalia, who stayed in the case despite conflict-of-interest questions relating to his friendship with Cheney. He said a president has broad authority to keep matters private.

"He has the power as an independent branch to say, 'No, this intrudes too much upon my powers. I will not do it,'" Scalia said.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040427/D827DRJG0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are we supposed to be surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Scalia is violating the law. IMPEACH HIS ASS!!
He has a demonstrated bias in the case and this is a defnite impropriety!

The fucker deserves prison!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He should be disbarred and impeached at the least!
Judicial bias coupled with total disregard for the law is just plain WRONG! Sorry Tony, get the hell OFF the bench!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hornito Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. He deserves worse than prison. He is a traitor to this nation,
and as such, deserves the most severe punishment for his treason, allowed under the law. I say he should swing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is why cheney took it straight to the supreme court.
He had no hope in the lower courts where it should have played out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. So let me see if I understand this....
Antonin "Fat Tony" Scalia believes the government, which is of the people and by the people and for the people, is entitled to privacy.

But the PEOPLE, under the Patriot Act, have no constitutional right to privacy and are subject to library record searches, book purchase record searches, and "sneak and peek" searches?

What the fucking fuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Look I can buy the executive privy law when it applies to government
officials, aids and advisors talking directly with the President. I cannot buy having private citizens having a meeting with the Vice President and discussing stuff that concerns the American people at large and being able to keep what was discussed private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Quack, quack!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fat Tony is such a disappointment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because he knows the plans to invade and occupy Iraq are
what the secret energy meetings are all about. Since when does energy policy need to be a state secret? When the policy shows an illegal, undemocratic, and un-American plan to steal another country's resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. J. Kerry
J. Kerry and the Dems should stop defending against petty Bushite attacks and start demanding justice for the American people. This issue is a place to start!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoggera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. He has nothing to be concerned about until
Kerry wins the election and at least one of his buddies retires. It can get lonely being a Supreme Court Justice when you have shown your contempt for the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC