Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

These totures were specific to offend Islam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:21 PM
Original message
These totures were specific to offend Islam
Think about it - simulated homosexual acts, rape, and attacks by dogs - about as offensive in Islam as it comes. We as Americans are looking at them as simply torture, but it goes further than that. This was a slap in the face of these people's religious beliefs.

Islam on dogs:
"The saliva of a dog is Najis (impure). If it touches the clothes or body, that portion also becomes impure and must be washed. And Allah Ta'ala Knows Best."
http://www.albalagh.net/qa/dogs_islam_prayer.shtml

Islam and homosexuality
"Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to." (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse) - statement attributed to the Prophet Mohammed
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_isla.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, homophobic xtian fundies are following the teachings of
the Prophet Mohammed?

Anybody have phone numbers for Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell? I have a couple of questions for them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think they'd claim to be following the teachings of Moses instead
Thus the frequent references to passages from Leviticus.

Never mind that Jesus was supposed to bring them a new covenant to replace the old laws, it's sufficient for fundies to find a condemnation anywhere in the book. Whenever a fundy goes off about homosexuality, be sure to ask him if he's eaten shellfish or worn mixed fabrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt it.
They made them perform homosexual acts because they could.

They used a dog because they had one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have many friends at work
who are Muslims. I noticed the choice of tortures right off the bat. These people are worse than despicable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think this points to something more than out-of-control GIs.
I dont think youd except the average GI to know about that dog thing, which makes me wonder who was really behind all this...some CIA or contractor operative who would know what would be a serious mindfuck for the POWs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You may be on to something.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Damn...I thought everyone knew! Check this out...
First this story here:
http://www.worldpress.org/link.cfm?http://www.mg.co.za/Content/l3.asp?ao=58904

Quoting...

Lawyers for the soldiers argue they are being made scapegoats for a rogue military prison system in which mercenaries give orders without legal accountability.
A military report into the Abu Ghraib case -- parts of which were made available to The Guardian -- makes it clear that private contractors were supervising interrogations in the prison…

<snip>

The military investigation names two US contractors, CACI International Inc and the Titan Corporation, for their involvement in Abu Ghraib.

<snip>

Neither responded to calls for comment on Thursday.
According to the military report on Abu Ghraib, both played an important role at the prison.
At one point, the investigators say: "A CACI instructor was terminated because he allowed and/or instructed MPs who were not trained in interrogation techniques to facilitate interrogations by setting conditions which were neither authorised in accordance with applicable regulations/policy."
Colonel Jill Morgenthaler, speaking for central command, told The Guardian: "One contractor was originally included with six soldiers, accused for his treatment of the prisoners, but we had no jurisdiction over him. It was left up to the contractor on how to deal with him."
She did not specify the accusation facing the contractor, but according to several sources with detailed knowledge of the case, he raped an Iraqi inmate in his mid-teens.


Not only that, but this had been going on for months and the Iraqis knew about it on the streets according to Riverbend's blog
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_riverbendblog_archive.html#108335179421604212

Quoting...

I felt a multitude of things as I saw them... the most prominent feeling was rage, of course. I had this incredible desire to break something- like that would make things somehow better or ease the anger and humiliation. We’ve been hearing terrible stories about Abu Ghraib Prison in Baghdad for a while now, but those pictures somehow spoke like no words could.

Seeing those naked, helpless, hooded men was like being slapped in the face with an ice cold hand. I felt ashamed looking at them- like I was seeing something I shouldn’t be seeing and all I could think was, “I might know one of those faceless men...” I might have passed him in the street or worked with him. I might have bought groceries from one of them or sat through a lecture they gave in college... any of them might be a teacher, gas station attendant or engineer... any one of them might be a father or grandfather... each and every one of them is a son and possibly a brother. And people wonder at what happened in Falloojeh a few weeks ago when those Americans were killed and dragged through the streets...


I don't wonder why those contractors were given such singular treatment anymore...and all this shit that's happened to Fallujah since was a reaction to that.
Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. This really sucks!
Man, we have a rogue state alright..the corporate contractors!

Man, no way should contractors be giving orders to guys in uniform in a situation like that....should be the other way around.

This really stinks to high heaven.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddy22600 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. bush ordered it so we could have more
terrorist attacks in the USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's a reason "civilian intelligence officials" greenlighted the...
...treatment, and none have been named or brought up on charges...

psychological torture...they were "very successful in breaking them (the prisoners) in one or two days"...

All they are missing is the pig blood. Just scroll some freep threads from Sept 12th. You'll find plenty of pointers on "how to torture muslims"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep, remember Neil Boortz after 9/11 calling for
He said we need to produce OBL or a "critical mass portion" of OBL and "feed him to the dogs on the White House lawn." There were weeks of people calling into his show with specific punishments that would be offensive to Islam. I couldn't believe the shit at the time, and now we find out we are doing this shit to POWs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Winning the hearts and minds of the Iraqis
We were not going to be welcome by dances and flowers. However, most of the Iraqis did not hate us after the invasion. After this episode, we can count on a far larger opposition and the hatred of a majority of the population. This is not how one wins the hearts and minds of an occupied country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. The one reminded me of a crucifixion and the others of Auschwitz.
The naked bodies piled on top of one another. Plus that, I have never heard such a lame ass apology as the one I did from * today. Instead of talking about how this does not represent the US military he should have been repeating over and over again how sorry the US is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. not to mention
women being involved in the humiliation / torture. That's probably *worse* than dog saliva in their religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I haven't thought of that, but you are right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. yes, there were 3 women there
good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. hell it's offensive to ANY religion
imagine u.s. p.o.w.'s going through this, the same thing would be being said. but the point remains the same, these acts WERE designed to offend islam in general
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. i cant spell the prison on cuba, the most offensive
Edited on Sat May-01-04 09:07 AM by seabeyond
they had women strip naked and was reported one women smeared her menstraul blood on the men
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. See what I mean
The instructions for this shit is coming from someone with knowledge of Islam - plain and simple. Although some of this stuff is well known. Like I said earlier, Neil Boortz after 9/11 had people calling in to his show talking about punishments for Al Qaeda. These were mostly your typical southern good ol' boys - they seemed to know a WHOLE lot about what was offensive to Islam. Some of the suggestions included many of the things we have actually seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thumbs up sign in Iraq equals flipping someone off
Thumbs-Up and OK
The thumbs-up gesture traditionally is an offensive Iraqi insult, equivalent to using the middle finger in the Western world. Some more media savvy Iraqis may understand the Western meaning of an upturned thumb as "all is OK", and intend the gesture to mean just that. Following the first Gulf War, many Middle Easterners adopted this hand movement as a symbol of cooperation toward freedom. Other Iraqis may use the gesture in its traditional sense.


http://128.196.21.241/cultural/iraq/culture_gestures.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. More insults:
Shame and Arab Culture
Bringing shame upon an Arab can have dangerous, and perhaps deadly, consequences. It is important to understand actions that can shame an Arab and to avoid those actions wherever possible. For example, correcting an Iraqi in public or using of the left-hand can shame an Iraqi.


Animals
Like other Muslims, most Iraqis consider dogs unclean and will be very reluctant to touch one. Those Iraqis who have anything to do with raising animals may have guard dogs for their flocks, but even so, are not accustomed to the notion of dogs in the house. An Iraqi who has touched a dog will want to wash his or her hands, either immediately afterwards or most certainly before eating. Muslims do, however, like cats. Muhammad, the founder of Islam, was once said to have cut off the hem of his robe rather than disturb the cat sleeping on it.

Touching people of opposite sex:
Male westerners should not show any interest or affection toward Arab women, or even to female members of his own family. Further, men should avoid dating Arab women, photographing them, or staring. Public affection toward someone of the opposite sex, even a simple touching of the hands, should be avoided. This behavior is considered unacceptable in Muslim/Arab society.

Pointing:

When possible, avoid pointing a finger at objects or at a person to whom one wishes to speak. A pointed finger sends the message that the person pointed to is no better that an animal.


Taboos concerning head and feet
Big blunders can arise if Westerners are unaware of the significance of the head
and the feet in Arabic culture. Be aware that forcing an Iraqi's head to touch the ground may make that Iraqi an enemy. Muslims only touch their heads to the ground when praying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Islam and nudity
On the matter of nudity the Holy Prophet of Islam, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, has unequivocally forbidden the exposure of one's private parts. He forbade males to show and look upon one another's genitals and also forbade women to look upon one another's private parts. (Kitab-ul-Hamam)

http://www.alislam.org/library/links/nudity.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC