Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAMERA MOVED OFF POWELL DURING RUSSERT GRILLING [drudge sorry]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:25 AM
Original message
CAMERA MOVED OFF POWELL DURING RUSSERT GRILLING [drudge sorry]
Edited on Sun May-16-04 10:26 AM by truthisfreedom
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm


BLEEP THE PRESS: CAMERA MOVED OFF POWELL DURING RUSSERT GRILLING; AIDE ATTEMPTED TO CUT OFF INTERVIEW
Sun May 16 2004 10:45:35 ET

An aide to Sec. of Defense Colin Powell ordered a halt to an interview and directed a camera to shoot a palm tree during provocative questioning by MEET THE PRESS host Tim Russert.
<snip>
"Emily, get out of the way.  Bring the camera back please," the secretary snapped.
<snip>
How concerned are you that some of the information you shared with the world is now inaccurate and discredited?

SECRETARY POWELL:  I'm very concerned.  When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me.  We studied it carefully.  We looked at the sourcing and the case of the mobile trucks and trains.  There was multiple sourcing for that.  Unfortunately, that multiple sourcing over time has turned out to be not accurate, and so I'm deeply disappointed. 

But I'm also comfortable that at the time that I made the presentation it reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment, of the intelligence community, but it turned out that the sourcing was inaccurate and wrong and, in some cases, deliberately misleading.  And for that I'm disappointed, and I regret it.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Emily needs to...
Find a job she is more suited to, emotionally. I suspect that she soon will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. I'll bet Emily wants to spend more time with her family
unless this is a signal that Cheney has fired Powell and all that's left is the public announcement that Powell wants to spend more time with HIS family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Emily "You're Fired!!


This was beautiful.
They are coming down down down.
Colin is about to fold and jump ship.
Then he'll blame it on Emily - ha ha ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. No one gets fired in this administration
Bush will say:

Emily, you're doing a GREAT job. You're the BEST press aide this administration has ever had.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Powell: "...evidence was...deliberately MISLEADING..." !!!!!Wow!!!!
Colin is throwing the neocons to the wolves. What a show.

I don't have TV. I think I'm gonna get one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. What troubles me...
...is the fact that Russert-the-Ho is now trying to blame it on "a rogue CIA agent named Curveball."

I blame it on a rogue administration named "Screwball."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Sounds to me like he's going after the intelligence community
"BushCo was deliberately misled. BushCo did nothing wrong. BushCo is not responsible...." maybe they'll try to strike back at the intelligence community for the Hersch article. If they do, I suspect they'll fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Exactly. Please read my Post #21.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doxieone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. THIS IS AN INSULT To POWEll.....
Of all people on TeamBush, Powell knows how to handle the hard questions.

Emily has not helped her boss at all. Say Goodbye, Emily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Yes, indeed. Powell has been handling the "hard questions"...
...since his efforts to help cover-up My Lai, the effects of Agent Orange, the effects of Gulf War Syndrome, and other activities as required to "protect" the Army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Thanks for this post and #21
Powell is not an innocent man caught in a bad situation. All that's happened now is that his Teflon has finally worn off. Thanks for keeping the facts straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Emily Miller former aide to Bugman Tom Delay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. With a background at NBC. Is there evidence somewhere that...
Powell's Emily is the same Emily?


...
Emily Miller, a former press secretary in the leadership office, has been named communications director to the majority whip, one of five changes in his press office.

Miller, who was press secretary to then-Rep. Rick Lazio (R-N.Y.), came to Capitol Hill from television news.

She had been an associate producer for ABC News’ “This Week” and “Good Morning America,” and a production assistant in NBC News’ Washington Bureau. A native of Baltimore, Miller is a graduate of Georgetown University.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. State Department Bureau of Public Affairs
directory says she's the Deputy Press Secretary for Robert Tappan

http://foia.state.gov/mms/OrgDirectory/print_org.asp?ID=50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athletic Grrl Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
45. Same Emily Miller?
It's not an uncommon name. Or can she hold two positions like that at once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Isn't Google wonderful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Any chance she is related to NYT/CIA Op Judith Miller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Emily is toast, just like Bushmonkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omshanti Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. so that's what McCain meant by the palm tree comment!
i only caught the 2nd half of MTP... when Russert asked McCain if he (McCain) would consider the Democratic VP ticket, McCain said something along the lines of "Now Tim if you would only be so kind as to pan over to a palm tree."

Did anyone else see that?
Thanks to DU for clarifying that for me... I was wondering where that came from!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
28. Yeah, it was very witty
I wish they'd moved to a palm tree when Biden was urging McCain to accept Kerry's call.

No Republicans in a Democratic White House, No Republicans in a Democratic cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omshanti Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. Now *that* would have been too funny. n/t
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
68. Cohen was OK under Clinton.
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Somebody'd better let Drudge know that Colin Powell is
Secretary of STATE - not SecDef.

Adios, Emily. Start checking employment ads in The Post or Roll Call.

You're history. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Maybe he really IS the SecDef...Chimpy called Rummy SOS the other day
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. It wouldn't surprised me one iota if he was
This administration has gone out of its way to turn the State Department into "Pentagon II".

These clowns don't believe in diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. And Condoleeza called Bush her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. Drudge has fixed it now so it says Sec of State
Edited on Sun May-16-04 11:15 AM by scmirage
But I loved how he got it wrong the first time around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm sure the Bugman will take her back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. This was one of the most bizarre things ...

...I've ever seen. This moment in American fascism brought to you by the Republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TN al Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. CNN is about to report on it right NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. It happened exactly after Russert asked Posell about his l ies to the UN
about the WMD.

Heard something like "Oh F--, not that question again!" - then a bunch of confusion, etc.

These thugs can't handle real questioning - and certainly none that they don't have prepared answers for.

Hello"! Any real DEMOCRAT out there?! This is why we should be hammering and hammering about their LIES for CHOOSING to start this "war" to begin with! They are the most weak on this!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Why do I think Powell regrets ever
becoming part of the Neocon revolution. I wouldn't be surprised if he writes another book this time recounting his horrible experiences under the Rove/Cheney/Rumsfeld administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
59. Yes we SHOULD! "we should be hammering and hammering about their LIES"
YES YES YES!

First Thing Tomorrow Morning!

PLEASE NOTE MY SIG LINE – TO CALL YOUR REPS, TOLL FREE!!!

OR, TRY (877) – 762 – 8762. It’ll get you there, too! (Thank you, DUer redqueen!)


Please note, here, The World's Greatest Lists of Media Contacts – updated May 5, 2004– in the following thread:

LINK:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1533796#

IF THEY THINK WE DON’T CARE, THEY WON’T, EITHER!


BTW - this could be enough to turn Timmy against them now, too. He's not gonna like some outsider's hand messing with HIS show. Even HE should smell a rat by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Speaking of "deliberately misleading", Powell stated that...
..."When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me.", which is VERY misleading. The CIA, in the person of George Tenet himself, told Powell repeatedly NOT to use the information on the alleged Iraqi WMDs in Powell's presentation to the UN.

This was during the time-frame that the NeoCon, Pentagon-based OSP was also briefing the Pentagon, Junior, and the National Security team on Iraqi WMDs. This information was coming from Iraqi sources under the control of the OSP. As Powell correctly states, those sources were "inaccurate and wrong and, in some cases, deliberately misleading."

Additionally, Rummy had been trying for quite some time to have the CIA report to him directly, because he didn't like the information that the CIA was providing...primarily that there were NO WMDs in Iraq. If they had been forced to use the CIA's information, the NeoCons would not have had the rationale to invade and occupy Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Emily Comes from DeLAY *and* LAZIO?
Figures. Add to that her background in media------when THOSE go into bureaucracy as "media experts" they are klutzes, have their small-head-media-hats on and screw up BADLY. Is she on suicide watch now?

********QUOTE********

.... Emily Miller, a former press secretary in the leadership office, has been named communications director to the majority whip, one of five changes in his press office.

Miller, who was press secretary to then-Rep. Rick Lazio (R-N.Y.), came to Capitol Hill from television news.

She had been an associate producer for ABC News’ “This Week” and “Good Morning America,” and a production assistant in NBC News’ Washington Bureau. A native of Baltimore, Miller is a graduate of Georgetown University. ....

********UNQUOTE******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
27. It's particularly noteworthy that Emily ASSUMED MTP would edit ...
... the interview in a manner to comply with her "friendly" expectations. Whenever I look at such behavior, I strive to understand the inferred 'worldview' of people acting in such a manner. Obviously, Ms. Miller had some reason, based on history or relationships, to believe that the interview would be edited in a 'cooperative' manner. This strongly substantiates the whorishness of the corporate media, imho. It would be inconceivable, in a truly free and democratic culture, that an American Commissar would wield such grossly heavy-handed control. This is the kind of Party Correctness police reminiscent of the Soviet Union, where Communist Party enforcers were assigned to all military units and government functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. And the fact that Russert didn't cut it may be a signal...
that people with careers may be hedging their bets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. Thanks for this insight -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. Russert specifically said at the end:
"That was an UNEDITED interview with Colin Powell". Makes you wonder, are the normally edited? Did Russert make a decision to leave the attempted censorship in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncertainty1999 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
65. yes -- great point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bacchant Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hmm... I don't know
I didn't see this but it could have been a stunt, staged to reinforce Powell's flagging reputation. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. deliberately misleading
as bushco's are saying they just got it wrong, or cia just got it wrong, we know it was deliberately misleading. that is lying. good he said this outloud, now this needs to filter thru out and become the basis to the story

bet it was cheney and bush who gave him the deliberate misleading info to get him on board and to the u.n. we all know he was opposed and right before that speech made a complete turn in his thoughts. bushco made up this info to bring him on board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. Official CYA version floating around
Is that this was Colin's 3rd interview of the day and that the cameraman "got tired"!!!!!! Jesus, this is the biggest bunch of lying MoFo's I've ever had the extreme displeasure to watch in action--and I remember Nixon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
32. I hope this gets some HUGE media play.
People are finally starting to see what kind of people we're dealing with.

"Deliberately misleading".... Something we've known all along, and now it's been confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. I saw that and it made my day
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. I didn't know what was going on
until Russert said "Secretary Powell? That's very INAPPROPRIATE!" Then Powell ordered the camera back and answered the question. Tim clarified what happened at the end of the interview by saying it was pretaped, but unedited and Powell's press agent had tried to shut down the interview when Tim asked the last question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. Who is "Curve Ball"? - eom
Edited on Sun May-16-04 11:44 AM by patrice
Also, the multiple sources were their own echoes in an empty room (inside the president's head).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. I think it was an Iraqi....maybe Chalabi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
64. I remember reading on DU that
Curveball is a relative of Chalabi, or a best friend of one of Chalabi's aids. Anyway, Curveball is connected with Chalabi. That's why the disinformation. Cheney and Rummy love Chalabi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v2.0
==================

The time now is 12:42:31PM EDT, Sunday, May 16, 2004.

There are exactly...
0 days,
11 hours,
17 minutes, and
29 seconds left in our fund drive.

This website could not survive without your generosity. Member donations
pay for more than 84% of the Democratic Underground budget. Don't let
GrovelBot become the next victim of the Bush economy. Bzzzt.

Please take a moment to donate to DU right now. Thank you for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athletic Grrl Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
39. What time
Does MSNBC rerun it? I missed MTP on the one day I shouldn't have. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. Re: What time
It reruns tonight at 10 p.m. and 1 a.m. eastern time on CNBC, and also at 8 and 10 p.m. eastern time tomorrow on CNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
40. How can Colin Powell be comforted that we got the WRONG FUCKING INTEL!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. Out of control desperation
What a wacky tv moment. Craziest I've seen since Richard Nixon violently shoved Ronald Ziegler towards a crowd of reporters.

Clearly, Powell and the Chimpistration are not on the same page, and Emily was taking the initiative to clumsily protect them from the press, even if it meant embarassing Powell.

Russert has been awfully sympathetic to the Chimpistration for a long time, but since his bizarre "interview" with His Chimperial Majesty a few months ago -- which shocked even some supporters -- Russert has ceased protecting them from making assholes of themselves.

Of course, there will be an orchestrated effort to characterize Russert as adverserial, which is an outright lie. All he has to do is let them "be themselves" to be "adverserial." This is what it has come to.

Clearly, the Alert Level in the WH is Red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. she's nannying Powell?
This is kind of scary, actually. Powell has to deal with this kind of "protection" in his inner staff? Why was she even there? His own spokesperson is Boucher, whom we assume he trusts. Why was this known Repug sitting in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. On location in Jordan...
grasswire,
Boucher is likely still in D.C. Oftentimes, when "principals" travel they don't take their top aides with them, but assistants and deputies and the like...

This incident is just strange though...h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. Powell has lost all credibility
he's beginning to look like a wing-nut defending a lost cause. He should cut and run from this mis-administration ASAP but he won't. No, he'd rather stay loyal.

"You know Colin, loyalty is a good to a point, but when it becomes an impediment to the country you serve YOU SHOULD OPEN YOUR EYES!"

Powell has drunk the Kool Aid, and he's going down with the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
51. Sounds like another "Palm Beach" riot..
.. Emily being one of DeLay's henchmen, makes me think she was part of the original one. You couldn't make this shit up.. it gets wierder every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
53. BREAKING NEWS: Not a palm tree, but Candidate Ficus!
What was Ficus doing over in Jordan with Powell?

Was this a publicity stunt by Michael Moore?

(just joking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrotim Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. oh please; let us not kid ourselves: russert is the whore of whores
i'm thrilled to see the bush misadministration humiliated again this week, but let's keep in mind that timmy russert is merely changing boats in midstream, now that it's clear the u.s.s. bushtanic is going down.

this was a taped interview. taped interviews are regularly edited of emberrassing, unplanned events, or merely for smoothness and continuity.

how many russert brain-farts (or actual farts) are edited out of his interviews on a regular basis?

the fact that russert made a point of leaving this little fracas in the broadcast is merely a sign that he is abandoning ship now that Iraq is a disaster, and he's decided to play "serious journalist" until, once again, it is no longer convenient or cuts into his popularity on the D.C. cocktail party circuit.

I was particularly amused by timmy's placement on his face of the "dubious, tough journalist" mask he wears when it suits his sense of drama. excuse me, where was that stupid mask when our army was rolling across Iraq and there was NO credible independent evidence to support bush's reasoning for the invasion?

the mask was on a hook in tim's dressing room, next to the tub of #5 foundation and tubes of whore's red rouge.

russert is what's wrong with u.s. journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. actually the deputy press sec Miller is what's wrong with the gov't
Powell's job is to answer or refuse to answer the question....not to be censored by his deputy press sec. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. why is my transcript different than the other one posted?
Here is my own transcript of the incident. I haven't seen this format noted anywhere. :wtf: is going on?

Russert:
asks ? re: case Saddam Hussein

Cut off ...

Emily in the background; talks about "editing"

Powell in background ... "he is still asking questions" ...

Powell: Tim I am sorry I lost you

Russert: I am still here Mr. Secretary, I would hope they'd put you back on camera. I don't know who did that. I think that is one of your staff. I think it is inappropriate.

Powell: Emily get away! Bring the camera back ...

Russert: Thank you very much sir.

Russert: Asks Saddam ? again re: Curveball ...

End of interview after response

Russert: Mr. Secretary we thank you for very much joining us again and sharing you views with us today.

Powell: Thanks Tim

Russert: And, that was an unedited interview with the Secretary of State taped earlier this morning from Jordan. We appreciate Secretary Powell's willingness to overrule his press aide's attempt to abruptly cut off our discussion as I began to ask my final question.

Is this any different than what others have seen? I have this on tape. No questions.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Russert is usually hard on everyone.
I know he is disliked here, but Russert has been professional all of the times I have seen him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Russert seemed really pissed
Anyone that saw this interview and what happened must have noticed how angry Russert was. Especially at the end when he said what he said about Powell's aide cutting him off and how inappropriate it was. I say :thumbsup: to Russert regardless of what others may have to say about him with respect to this interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Re: Russert is usually hard on everyone
He wasn't hard on Bush. I was really disappointed in that interview, and I usually like Russert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Wasn't Russert involved in Dem politics...
before he took the job at MTP? I heard that on one of his interviews about his new book... I remember it suprising me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JawJaw Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
61. Banana Republican
Nice little quote from Ms Miller Here from Nov '01, giving her opinion on whether military vehicles should have been stationed public areas in D.C.

"That's not what America is all about," said DeLay spokeswoman Emily Miller. "That's what a banana republic is all about."




She should know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
66. "No. They can't use it, they're editing it..." Miller said on an open micr
Do you hear this? She is basically censoring the interview. What gall these people have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC