|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:21 AM Original message |
What the hell happened to World Trade Center 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. "The government" blew it up on purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. P.S. I don't really believe that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElementaryPenguin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
67. I do! It's one of the MAJOR MIHOP smoking guns!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. answer the question in post #28 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I've heard about this, but dismissed it and never saw the videos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. nevermind, I haven't caught up to the post-irony era yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecessaryOnslaught (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. yep, twas imploded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. Oh god |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. what are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slaveplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 06:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Wasn't WTC 6 closer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GregW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Nothing happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donovanf (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Diesel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. Here's a fine old thread from 2002 with lots of good info, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
11. Nothing to see here, folks. Move along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yes, and 110-story buildings collapse near them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 03:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yes, all historical anomalies are fully and unquestioningly explained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. What anomaly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. so, it was a natural collapse as the result of fire? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
40. For the first time in history a steel building collapsed because of fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:22 AM Response to Reply #40 |
52. For the first time in history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
79. WHOA there, my friend! WTC wasn't hit by a jet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. GET. HELP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. WTC7 was not hit by jets, the Towers were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Geez. Sorry, I meant to say WTC 7 wasn't hit by a jet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:03 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Sorry, I am not surprised by much here anymore I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
58. Not True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
81. Look at your sources again........you are incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. same thing that happened to WTC1 and WTC2 . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That depends on the definition of 'controlled' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I saw someone's evidence of this once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 03:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. How many scientists and engineers studied the one-of-a-kind, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:18 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. lots of disinfo being thrown around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. "You've always heard"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:44 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. all those documentaries on demolition experts, of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
53. Yes they go through a lot of trouble... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #30 |
59. Neat terrorists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #30 |
62. I call BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
71. try reading it again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
74. Why on earth was the rubble sold for scrap before it could be fully |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:42 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. here's the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
72. Why wasn't the rubble forensically studied to find out the answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. You don't "smell" BS. You "expel" it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. why would anyone want a forensic investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
73. Show me their studies, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
55. People are now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #17 |
61. Good Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Ok, lets play conspiracy terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff in Cincinnati (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
19. I want the Tin Foil Concession on this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Can I have the Bullshit Concession? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff in Cincinnati (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
54. I think there are several others vying for that rightn now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 06:57 AM Response to Original message |
20. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:07 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. yeah, your post was bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:55 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. It may not have been in YOUR post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
37. I apologize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopaul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
29. please look the other way tom, this type of stuff just gets you upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. I'm not upset. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
31. Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:33 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. EXACTLY. It makes no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:35 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. The question that stops conspiracy theorists in their tracks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libcurious (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Need a better question than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:14 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libcurious (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:20 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Here, please try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:29 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
82. You think Bushco didn't have a motive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 08:57 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. nonsense, WTC7 was a high value target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. High value target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #42 |
70. the hotel across the street, and the church is still standing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #38 |
57. The firefighters weren't even "speculating". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
44. Nick Berg. 'Nough said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Nough said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Numero uno. I don't mind conspiracy theories but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libcurious (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
46. Documented answer to your question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Pull it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. this does NOT answer the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
51. I heard seven buildings came down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rastignac5 (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
60. This thread has at least served one purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Newbie, you have some nerve! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:32 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Nerve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
(549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Way to go sangh0 |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. There's a first time for everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
(549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 12:35 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. What you don't know about DUers |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #60 |
76. Thanks for helping us identify one of them, anyway.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hammie (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
78. A fire didn't cause the building to collapse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doni_georgia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
85. Someone posted threads from 9/11 the other day - I noticed something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC