LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:47 AM
Original message |
C-Span 7:45 ET: The first ethicist to discuss *'s ethics. might be good. |
|
The President of Good and Evil C-SPAN, Washington Journal Peter Singer , Princeton University
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:49 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Bush sees himself as being called to lead the forces of good against the |
|
forces of evil. Makes the author uncomfortable.
This attitude made him play Saddam into his simplistic assumptions leading us to war.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Bush uses "evil" as a noun not an adjective. This allows him |
|
to emphasize his view of the world. Reagan had to be convinced to use the "evil empire" name for the USSR. But Bush uses it continously and semantics are subtle but allow him to do what he wants.
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Thanks for the heads up |
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Bush write about his faith in a very naive way. Not a very critical |
|
view of the gospels (when he visited Israel and standing in the place where Christ stood). Doesn't realize that the Gospels are not "absolute truth" in terms of geographical situation of where Jesus spoke.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Even the Afghan war was not of "last resort." Powell said that |
|
Bush wanted to "kill someone" after 9/11. Did not give a chance to get a tribunal to try to judge Osama if the Taliban gave him up.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Repug caller says the author has a "liberal bias" in his book. |
|
Author is not saying that Bush is a liar. But he examines what Bush* says and then judge him on the result of that examination.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:02 AM
Response to Original message |
7. He analyzes Bush*'s opposition to stemcell research because |
|
of the "potential" life of embryos. And then he attacks Iraq killing innocent men, women, and children destroying real lives.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Repug: what about Muslim religion compared with Christians? |
|
Christians are better, according to the caller. Response: he has not said Christianity is horrible but we should not characterize Islam as horrible (cites the inquisition, the Holocaust, etc. which we don't use to characterize the Christian faith.) Bush has handed the decisions that will kill people to Pentagon. Bombing residential areas to capture a general in Tikrit for example.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Conference of religious organization where Bush created based |
|
faith groups to get government money to provide services. (by the way, I didn't know he has expanded the faith-based initiatives so much! EEEEEEWWWWWW)
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message |
10. * is not even doing the wrong thing for the right reason. |
|
The ethicist would do better to discuss the pathology of narcissism and examine *'s need to correct every slight he's ever received in his life, his mother's life, and his father's life.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:07 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Bush* has done nothing to improve the life of the poor. Just given |
|
money to faith based institutions.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:13 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Bush is too simplistic to be the leader of a country like the US. |
|
Does not read, does not analyze. Caller asked what right author has to judge Bush. The guy essentially said "think!"
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Somebody mentioned the Berg beheading's theories on the web. |
|
First time I have heard that on C-Span. Mr. Singer said he has no opinions or views on those theories but that if AlQaida did it they really committed a political blunder because of the timing.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:20 AM
Response to Original message |
14. A RW called and he anchor let him go on and on after he was |
|
rude and lied about a quote from the author on the New York Times. She should just have hung up on him after he said to Singer "You had your time to talk, BOY..."
|
onecitizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. These right wing zealots..... |
|
have me scared. Goodness, that man needed a big dose of Thorazine and some leather restraints.
|
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:21 AM
Response to Original message |
15. thanks for the updates, LA81! |
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
17. When Bush uses religious language: freedom is a gift from God. |
|
He only wants to talk to people that share his beliefs and then tries to marginalize those who don't. Public discourse should be based on rational, thought out ideas not just religious beliefs.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. RW caller says that Bush has the right to express his religious beliefs. |
|
She cites the Weekly Standard. Enough said.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Singer said that Pentagon talked about the Weekly Standard |
|
and said that the information had not been "properly vetted." And we know that when Pentagon says that it means that the lie is too big to be passed to the public. He said AlQaida is happy not to have Saddam. He said Chalabi was the source of much of the information and he had been passing info to Iran (and Iran using Chalabi to have the US to overthrow Saddam)
|
Sentath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Thats a very 'enlightenment' type idea, and there's very little the zealots hate more.
{rlg}
(thank you)
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message |
20. A democrat was talking about Ollie North and Boykin saying |
|
that "our God is better than the Islamic God." The Christian ethos has dehumanized the enemy and perverted rational thought to enable them to attack Moslems and kill them with impunity. Singer said that Bush as not personally said anything like this but the military has and it is very worrying
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Singer said that the president should not necessarily be "secular" but |
|
whoever is president should not let religion influence his decisions and policies for the entire country.
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message |
23. I have seen him before, Singer is terrific! |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 08:12 AM by crozet4clark
This was an excellent segment, IMHO. I am headed out to pick up this book.
After listening to Singer's very cogent arguments it struck me, this is why I despise Bu$h and his ilk so much, they are illogical. They consider only one side of an argument, theirs.
Since when is it a weakness to consider ALL sides of an argument before making a decision?? It is downright dangerous that Bushit Admins. habit of makes decisions WITHOUT considering the opposing POV.
I think John Kerry needs to take charge of this stupid, negative meme that he is a flip-flopper, and turn it into a positive one. I want a president that uses critical reasoning skills and considers ALL the ramifications of something important before he makes a decision. Bu$h's thought process is too limited and non-critical to be in such a position of leadership. I want someone who uses their head and their gut, thank you.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |