Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C-Span 7:45 ET: The first ethicist to discuss *'s ethics. might be good.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:47 AM
Original message
C-Span 7:45 ET: The first ethicist to discuss *'s ethics. might be good.
The President of Good and Evil
C-SPAN, Washington Journal
Peter Singer , Princeton University
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush sees himself as being called to lead the forces of good against the
forces of evil.
Makes the author uncomfortable.

This attitude made him play Saddam into his simplistic assumptions leading us to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush uses "evil" as a noun not an adjective. This allows him
to emphasize his view of the world.
Reagan had to be convinced to use the "evil empire" name for the USSR. But Bush uses it continously and semantics are subtle but allow him to do what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the heads up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush write about his faith in a very naive way. Not a very critical
view of the gospels (when he visited Israel and standing in the place where Christ stood). Doesn't realize that the Gospels are not "absolute truth" in terms of geographical situation of where Jesus spoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Even the Afghan war was not of "last resort." Powell said that
Bush wanted to "kill someone" after 9/11. Did not give a chance to get a tribunal to try to judge Osama if the Taliban gave him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Repug caller says the author has a "liberal bias" in his book.
Author is not saying that Bush is a liar. But he examines what Bush* says and then judge him on the result of that examination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. He analyzes Bush*'s opposition to stemcell research because
of the "potential" life of embryos. And then he attacks Iraq killing innocent men, women, and children destroying real lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Repug: what about Muslim religion compared with Christians?
Christians are better, according to the caller.
Response: he has not said Christianity is horrible but we should not characterize Islam as horrible (cites the inquisition, the Holocaust, etc. which we don't use to characterize the Christian faith.)
Bush has handed the decisions that will kill people to Pentagon. Bombing residential areas to capture a general in Tikrit for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Conference of religious organization where Bush created based
faith groups to get government money to provide services. (by the way, I didn't know he has expanded the faith-based initiatives so much! EEEEEEWWWWWW)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. * is not even doing the wrong thing for the right reason.
The ethicist would do better to discuss the pathology of narcissism and examine *'s need to correct every slight he's ever received in his life, his mother's life, and his father's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush* has done nothing to improve the life of the poor. Just given
money to faith based institutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bush is too simplistic to be the leader of a country like the US.
Does not read, does not analyze.
Caller asked what right author has to judge Bush. The guy essentially said "think!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Somebody mentioned the Berg beheading's theories on the web.
First time I have heard that on C-Span. Mr. Singer said he has no opinions or views on those theories but that if AlQaida did it they really committed a political blunder because of the timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. A RW called and he anchor let him go on and on after he was
rude and lied about a quote from the author on the New York Times. She should just have hung up on him after he said to Singer "You had your time to talk, BOY..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. These right wing zealots.....
have me scared. Goodness, that man needed a big dose of Thorazine and some leather restraints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. thanks for the updates, LA81!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. When Bush uses religious language: freedom is a gift from God.
He only wants to talk to people that share his beliefs and then tries to marginalize those who don't.
Public discourse should be based on rational, thought out ideas not just religious beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. RW caller says that Bush has the right to express his religious beliefs.
She cites the Weekly Standard. Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Singer said that Pentagon talked about the Weekly Standard
and said that the information had not been "properly vetted." And we know that when Pentagon says that it means that the lie is too big to be passed to the public.
He said AlQaida is happy not to have Saddam.
He said Chalabi was the source of much of the information and he had been passing info to Iran (and Iran using Chalabi to have the US to overthrow Saddam)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sentath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Thats gotta sting.
Thats a very 'enlightenment' type idea, and there's very little the zealots hate more.

{rlg}

(thank you)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. A democrat was talking about Ollie North and Boykin saying
that "our God is better than the Islamic God." The Christian ethos has dehumanized the enemy and perverted rational thought to enable them to attack Moslems and kill them with impunity.
Singer said that Bush as not personally said anything like this but the military has and it is very worrying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Singer said that the president should not necessarily be "secular" but
whoever is president should not let religion influence his decisions and policies for the entire country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
23. I have seen him before, Singer is terrific!
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 08:12 AM by crozet4clark
This was an excellent segment, IMHO. I am headed out to pick up this book.

After listening to Singer's very cogent arguments it struck me, this is why I despise Bu$h and his ilk so much, they are illogical. They consider only one side of an argument, theirs.

Since when is it a weakness to consider ALL sides of an argument before making a decision?? It is downright dangerous that Bushit Admins. habit of makes decisions WITHOUT considering the opposing POV.

I think John Kerry needs to take charge of this stupid, negative meme that he is a flip-flopper, and turn it into a positive one. I want a president that uses critical reasoning skills and considers ALL the ramifications of something important before he makes a decision. Bu$h's thought process is too limited and non-critical to be in such a position of leadership. I want someone who uses their head and their gut, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC