Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats to Pull Out of Arkansas and Tennessee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:51 AM
Original message
Democrats to Pull Out of Arkansas and Tennessee
Chuck Todd of the Hotline was speaking on CNN yesterday (Hotline is a regular feature on C-Span; follows all the political races; and great source of information from within the campaigns). He was talking about the "bubble states"--those states where the candidates have poured in money in ads and in appearances because they were thought "do-able".

He reported that the Dems are pulling out of Arkansas and Tennessee. That's a polite way of saying that we are cutting our loses and running and declaring those states unwinable.

That hit me like a brick in the gut. It's only the first of June and we are already into "cutting and running" mode. I wanted to scream that we really haven't even launched a campaign yet--why can't they wait a bit. Then I said to myself that maybe it's because we haven't launched a campaign yet that we are already cutting out. Some say not to worry because its waaaay to early (been saying that for months). Well, for Arkansas and TN it's become "too late". I wish someone in the Kerry camp would realize that running for President on the national ticket is far different than running for Senator in a state that is predominently Democratic and "who knows your name".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why would the Democrats "cut and run" from
the states of Bill Clinton and Al Gore? It is way too early for that kind of decision. I'm not familiar with Chuck Todd. Could this just be more "talking points"? That is like bu$h cutting out of Texas. Has President Clinton or Veep Gore campaigned in those states yet? This seems a rather strange strategy, if it is accurate. I'm not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. This guy is very riliable and is not any Republican cheerleader
He reports from all the various campaigns and was given the info from the Democrats (not a guess) that they are leaving and putting their resources elsewhere. There was mention of it's significance in that they are the home states of Clinton and Gore. But, that's the decision that the big boys are making as they try to narrow down to where they want to aim the money. Also said that their are certain hopes for Virginia but most of the talk is that it's 'do-able' in 2008; also same sort of feeling about N. Carolina in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hate to hear those types of stories...
I don't think the Democrats should withdraw from any state. It sends the wrong message, imo. I realize they want to spend their money wisely, but surely a small token ad would not hurt the budget too much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Home states of Clinton and Gore?
Too bad they probably don't have the money. It doesn't look like the 11th District in VA is running anyone against the powerful Republican Representative, Tom Davis, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Home state of President Carter not winnable this year, either...
Thanks to "Go to Hell" Zell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donny247 Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cut and run????
You can hardly call it a "cut and run" when the Kerry campaign has expanded into three additional states: Virginia, Colorado, and Louisiana. Those three have more electoral votes, and are more realistic for Democrats in November.

This is simply a calculated re-calibration of the electoral map. It's called STRATEGY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like bullshit to me.
I can almost hear the next line:

"Democratics are so weak they can't even win the home states of Clinton and Gore".

Seems like a talking point strategy to make the Dems appear weak, nothing more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Ii'' repeat again....this guy doesn't do "talking points" but runs a very
reliable information network on the various campaigns. If anything he's always leaned very much to the Dems and eager to share any good news coming from their camps. Obviously you can't blather a talking point when the butts are firmly still in place in those states--that can be determined in the snap of a finger. They ARE pulling out. It just isn't adding up there so they have to use their resources elsewhere. Sadly, it looks like even Clark didn't make a dent in Arkansas. Who knows, once we do launch a campaign (if ever) things will look up there and they will try again. I didn't know about TN but I did have hopes for Arkansas because of Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. WTF? Weren't we tied in AR?
Last I saw, we were tied in Arkansas and down by only 6 or 7 in Tennessee. What in the friggity fuck? :wtf:

Next thing you know, we'll be conceding Ohio to concentrate on Florida. Worked pretty well for Gore in 2000, y'know.

:mad:

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Mallrat--Guess the thing that went "gulp" in me is that I hope
a few months down the road we are not concentrating everything we have on some neck and neck battle in just one state because we have "given up on the others". Every time we yield ground, it encourages them and makes us look weak. I think I would have left a few bodies around in those states, so to speak, and made it look like we had not pulled up stakes. I'm watching to see if Bush has given up on any bubble states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry hasn't spent money in Tennessee so how can he pull out ?
and it makes no sense anyways to pull out before the convention since that's when people start paying attention . and kerry is starting to reach out into virginia, louisiana, and colorado. i find this hard to believe. or maybe by democrats they meant someone besides kerry campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. JI7----that's a possibility in that he didn't (if I remember correctly)
use the name Kerry but referred to it as "Democrats" are pulling out. It would seem odd, though, that they would pull out if Kerry looked like he had a chance. There was mention of the money and ads spent and the number of times both Bush and Kerry visited these states, so I assume they were talking the presidential campaign!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. i can't find any info on it
i think we need some more info. this kind of thing would make news since we would be able to read reports of them stopping ads in arkansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. JI7--given our stupid media barely covers Kerry and the Dems I
didn't think I would have any luck ever hearing much reported. I was wondering if anyone who lives in either of those states has any concrete info on it. Anyone in contact with their campaign headquarters, etc. that could find out what they are doing and why??? I would assume the leading papers in the states would somewhere cover it. I don't know if it just happened or is going to happen soon. If anybody has any info, please share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. Definitely
party money targeted behind candidates vs. the Kerry campaign. They may be a bit confused by what "pulling out" means in October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. "pulling out" means no special TV/radio ads - but nothing else, right?
Battleground States get the money, and until the polls show those states are battleground (3 or 4 point spread) why do extra work and spend extra money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. but he hasn't spent any money for special tv/radio adsi n tennessee
that's why calling it "pull out" makes no sense. he has spent specifically for arkansas though. but why would they add tennessee when he hasn't spend in state yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Papau--it was pointed out that they are spending money, ads and
personal appearances in these two states (compared Bush and Kerry to date). They were "bubble" rather than "battleground" states--in other words, places that Bush had to defend and looked like they could go Dem. Apparently, the numbers must not have been shaping up to elevate them to "battleground" status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thanks for the clarification - :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Re-allocating Media Budget Doesn't Mean Cutting and Running
You win by landing the big states. OH, PA, and FL will win the election, not AR and TN.

In 2002, Gore narrowed his focus in the last couple of weeks to the key swing states. He even wisely avoided TN and went after the states with more electoral votes. He won all the close ones.

Bush, on the other hand, wasted time in CA and NJ and neglected the big states.

Kerry is a smart strategist. He is not a defeatist. I would like to see a little more evidence before giving any credence at all to Mr. Todd's spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. I was in AR last weekend and they seemed pretty Democrat friendly to me.
They're damned proud of being the home of the 42nd president of the United States. 'Course, I was in Eureka Springs which is quite a liberal little town. :) :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. I've never heard Chuck Todd portray a Democrat in a positive light.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. kentuck--I think you are thinking of the guy from Roll Call----he always
is trying to pump republicans and crap on Dems. The only good news I ever get from the front lines in the various Congressional campaigns, etc. is from Todd and his Hotline segment on C-Span.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think that you are jumping to conclusions.
Any good journalist gets at least two sources for their stories. This only has one, and it seems shaky.

I don't think anyone's writing off Arkansas or Tennessee just yet. A lot can happen in 5 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. On edit:: Utter BS. Called a fiend who works for Kerry.
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 09:40 AM by John_H
They're getting ready to open an office in Arkansas as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm sure we are establishing a campaign office in every state obviously
But, they are not going to spend the money on these two states anymore because they don't see them shaping up. There have been a number of visits already by Kerry and Bush to each one. Apparently that is to stop and ad money won't be spent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. kerry has visited arkansas only once
and i don't believe he has been to tennessee since the primary elections there. he certainly hasn't been there as much as he has to ohio and florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeachBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. You are correct.
Just a few minutes ago I spoke to one of my sources at the DNC and they said this report is "absolutely horseshit." Nuff said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. thanks
for the info. good to hear. and just when president clinton's book is about to come out. hopefully it helps kerry in arkansas and elsewhere. i'm hoping clinton's book will remind people of better times of hopeful times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beatrix Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
30. Smart move
Leaving states 5 months before the election. Before the real campaign has even started. Glad to see everything is being run by geniuses.

Fortunately we only lose 17 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC