|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:30 PM Original message |
Economically, is there really much difference between Keynesians and Suppl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kalian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. None IMHO.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I know Liberalism and Keynes used to be in synch, but that's changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. I believe Keynesians believed that some deficit spending could.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. They also targeted the spending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not at all. I just heard Clinton talking about this. No Keynsian is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. In that sense, both parties are Keynesian to a degree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Huh? Republicans couldn't be farther from Keynes. The reason they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Nevermind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. No one is a pure Keynesian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. That was one of the debates in the primary. Dean was anti-deficit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Depends on the economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. I think Keynes promoted deficit spending 'when necessary' ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. good point, they are both pro-Fiat money and pro-Inflation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopThief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Supply-siders are not "pro-Inflation". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. And fiat money is not "inherently inflationary" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. neither are Keynesians, officially, but in reality they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. The Problem With That, Mr. Thief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. I have another issue to debate about in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. actually I think it could be good in the long term, depending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. I oppose it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Indeed, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
16. It Is Not Quite The Right Question, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. excellent analysis, Magistrate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC