keithyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 08:10 PM
Original message |
|
Said there really was no clear evidence of WMDs so they took out the weapons Saddam had that were permissible. Felt they did a good job under Clinton. Wrong war, wrong time, wrong reason.
|
fearnobush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Zinni slamming the Neo-Cons on Norvell. |
|
This is huge stuff, he claims he speaking out against the Civilian leadership, Rummy, feith, Pearl, Chaney. Zinni, a Republican wants them out.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I don't know if Zinni is a republican |
TacticalPeek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. He said he voted Shrub based on mil reform, but mentioned Gore favored too |
|
He liked the Powell, Armitage, etc bunch.
Said he regrets endorsing, would stay out of that probably now.
|
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Zinni supported bush in 2000 |
|
Norville asked if he would be voting for bush again and he said it depended if the civilian leadership of the Pentagon had changed, implying that he may support bush again if he gets rid of Rummy, Wolfie and crew.
He also said he thought Clinton was "brilliant" but had problems with him because of his "moral failings".
I just can't figure out how Zinni can give W a pass for the bloody fiasco in Iraq. While millions of husbands are unfaithful to their spouses and lie about it, how many people have led our country into an unnecessary and "pre-emptive" war based upon lies? I don't approve of either, but the war is exponentially worse than infidelity.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Sounds more indie than repuke to me then |
|
I mean a lot of non-repukes supported Bush in 2000. Doesn't make them repukes then or now.
|
Reciprocity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This is a great interview!! n/t |
TacticalPeek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message |
3. "Senate staffers should not be writing war plans." |
|
Believe that's how he put it. :)
|
TacticalPeek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |
5. LOL! Tom Clancy on Paul Wolfowitz: "Is he really on our side?" |
|
"Is he really on our side? I'm sorry."
:evilgrin:
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Concur, GREAT Interview. Is Wolfowitz On Our Side? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |