Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bush entitled to counsel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 05:13 AM
Original message
Is Bush entitled to counsel?

Anybody involved in exposing a U.S. intelligence operative sure sounds like a terrorist suspect to me. And * says terrorist suspects are not entitled to counsel, so how can he get a lawyer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. asskroft has not arrested bu$h yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neoplatonist Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush deserves to spend himself into millions of dollars of legal bills
When the Repukes went after Clinton for eight straight years, he rang up over $10 million dollars in legal bills! Let Bush pay a similar price. However, there's a difference between Clinton and Bush: Clinton ended up being proven innocent and Bush will be proven to be a criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's interesting to note:
bush could use an "in house" attorney. However, because both are employees of the government, bush would not enjoy the protection of lawyer-client privilege .... hence, a government attorney could be forced to testify to a federal grand jury about what bush told him/her. (Or be deposed in a civil action, which Wilson & wife may actually do!) By getting an "outside" attorney, bush protects any/all conversations about what he knows about any wrong-doing on this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes , he is,
as are those being held illegally by the oligarchy.

Unfortunately, there are two sets of rules, one for the common folk and one for those who wield the reigns of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC