Senior citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:13 AM
Original message |
Is Bush entitled to counsel? |
|
Anybody involved in exposing a U.S. intelligence operative sure sounds like a terrorist suspect to me. And * says terrorist suspects are not entitled to counsel, so how can he get a lawyer?
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message |
1. asskroft has not arrested bu$h yet. |
Neoplatonist
(99 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:46 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Bush deserves to spend himself into millions of dollars of legal bills |
|
When the Repukes went after Clinton for eight straight years, he rang up over $10 million dollars in legal bills! Let Bush pay a similar price. However, there's a difference between Clinton and Bush: Clinton ended up being proven innocent and Bush will be proven to be a criminal.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. It's interesting to note: |
|
bush could use an "in house" attorney. However, because both are employees of the government, bush would not enjoy the protection of lawyer-client privilege .... hence, a government attorney could be forced to testify to a federal grand jury about what bush told him/her. (Or be deposed in a civil action, which Wilson & wife may actually do!) By getting an "outside" attorney, bush protects any/all conversations about what he knows about any wrong-doing on this case.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:57 AM
Response to Original message |
|
as are those being held illegally by the oligarchy.
Unfortunately, there are two sets of rules, one for the common folk and one for those who wield the reigns of power.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |