Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about all these job numbers...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 07:59 AM
Original message
Question about all these job numbers...
Now when they say the economy added 289K new jobs this past month, is that a net gain? Does that mean that no jobs were lost? How does that number interconnect with unemployment? How does unemployment stay flat but 289K new jobs be added?

Can someone offer a quick and dirty explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. McDonalds has quite a turnover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. And, Wal-Marts are popping up all over the country....
Wages...about $8. an hour, no benefits!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I had a potential
client call me to see how much of a house I could qualify her for. She's a department manager at Wal-Mart, has been for three years and grosses $1400 a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. BE skeptical ....
I certainly am ...

The news is CONSTANTLY relating stories of layoffs: even this week there were THOUSANDS of layoffs ...

Someone is saying that mom and pop stores are picking up the slack ? ...

WHERE is the PROOF that these jobs exist ? ...

It's an 'enronized' crock of BS, like every other bit of information from this criminal cabal ....

I dont believe it one bit ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You need to look...
at where the jobs were created.

There's a big difference between Wal-Mart jobs and manufacturing/professional jobs. The difference in salaries and the impact these salaries have on the rest of economy are huge.

I saw a lobbyist last week who talked about the disparity between a Wal-Mart cashier and the average manufacturing position ($375/week vs. $675/week in wages). The disparity is not only bad for the employee but for the community - lower tax base, greater burden shared by those who are more fully employed, reduced services (e.g., poor road maintenance, less money to schools, playgrounds torn up, reduced hours at the library, etc.).

Until we here more about where the jobs were created, we shouldn't get too excited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Mom and Pop stores
are closing right and left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Net gain.
nfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. hi, are you sure about that?
i thought that was just jobs gained, and not including those lost but i could be wrong. thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, it is net job growth.
nfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. thanks, i guess i was misinformed. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MARALE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. THESE JOBS
They were mostly in the construction and hotel areas, if you read the fine lines. Also the temporary jobs were up 22% and accounted for much of these jobs. I don't thinks they included the job losses. More people have been out of work for longer than ever before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. The numbers are seasonally adjusted
so the 248k number that came out today does not include seasonal only work, and the jobs are expected to last at least 12 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're counting the jobs created in Iraq. They are also
figuring that a lot of the unemployed have started their own companies, and that these companies must have at least one employee, so they've done a little math and came up with phantom employees to add to the list. All lies. The unemployment numbers are so screwed up after 3 years of fiddling with them that they are useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think people know what's going on here
people know what they feel, no amount of "Elaine Chao fudge" will change that. Low paying jobs don't pay for gas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeep Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It might not be that simple
An net increase of 248,000 jobs in May

The largest growth sectors were professional services, healthcare, financial services, construction, hospitality and manufacturing.

Average weekly earnings continued to increase in May by .3%, and have increased year to date by 2.2%.

1.4 million net increase in jobs since August, 2003.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Whatever we do from a political perspective, it doesn't help matters to deny the statistics. You can end up looking really foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're obviously too new to realize. . . . .
the truth around here. Bad news is gospel, good news is lies. Get it? (/sarcasm):hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Healthy Skepticism is a virtue ....
I know Ken Lay, John Ashcroft, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz occasionally tell the truth: ... just not to us ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Found this on another thread. Interesting and funny at the same time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Statistics under Bush are another way to lie. I will wait until
somebody with real knowledge analyzes this. Anything that comes out of this administration tends to be bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. These are REAL stats ? ...
http://www.nypost.com/business/23936.htm

WHAT ARE THEY SMOKING AT THE LABOR DEPT.?

By JOHN CRUDELE

May 11, 2004 -- DON'T get too excited about all those new jobs that were supposed to have been created in April.
I'm not going to waste a lot of my precious space on this, but the bottom line is that most of the 288,000 jobs that the Labor Department says were created last month may not really exist.

They could be figments of statisticians' optimism.

Anyone who plodded through my column last Thursday knows I predicted that job growth in April would be better than the 160,000 to 170,000 jobs that the "pros" were anticipating.

But I also said, quite emphatically I hope, that the stronger growth would be an illusion - the result of the Labor Department's computers making happy predictions about seasonal job creation that could neither be verified nor justified.

-snip-

I love a good story now and then .... but cmon ...

BTW: werent you banned ? ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. When people run out of unemployment insurance
the government counts them as "returning to work".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Wrong, The Bulk Of These Jobs Were Created With Birth/Death Model
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 10:28 AM by mhr
That means they were created out of whole cloth based on assumptions.

The BLS has no clue if these jobs actually exist. To Be more precise, the BLS "assumes" that any economic growth creates jobs. So the BLS takes the growth and invents jobs. There is no verification that these jobs actually exist.

In other words it is a process ripe for politicall manipulation.

In the real world, many professional types are now listing their extended unemployment as self employed. The bulk of these people are no more self employed than the man in the moon.

I know many people that are using this ploy to keep the resume from looking so bad.

The BLS uses this phenomena to their advantage to claim that hundreds of thousands of people are now working for themselves and hence new jobs have been created.

Totally bogus!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's summer. Have these numbers been seasonally adjusted?
Seems like if about two kids from every high school in the nation got jobs, that would be 250,000 . . . or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yes, they are seasonally adjusted.
The non seasonally adjusted number is about +1 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Robert Reich and jobs
Reich just explained we are still 1 million jobs in the hole. These are not new workers but many are workers returning to jobs they lost in the Bush years. He also said they are lower paid than previous jobs and most do not have health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Like his* mind, his figures are banal and devoid of quality
289k jobs.

Good.

All retail jobs at $7/hr, I bet.

I've seen lots of rubbish big-name retail stores cropping up, but that's all. :-(

Compared to the original 3 million jobs his* policies killed off, 289k high paying managerial jobs wouldn't make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC