Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:23 AM
Original message |
Anyone else notice something about this headline? |
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They are only counting the soldiers that dies in combat! |
|
What utter BULLSHIT!
:argh:
:mad:
|
livetohike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The article states "the 600th to die in action". Are they discounting "accidents"?
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
3. WHAT!!! 816 have been killed. They must be listening to wolfie |
Droopy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I thought it was more like 800 U.S. soldiers killed. n/t |
rainy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Its a misprint, it should say 800th |
i_c_a_White_Ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Yeah, funny how the figures go down |
|
while the casualties go up.
|
Senior citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
7. How can a dead soldier hold elections? |
|
That's worse than BBV.
:kick:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message |