CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:47 PM
Original message |
Republicans don't consider non-whites as "real" voters |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 05:48 PM by CatWoman
Got this from TPM.
He makes some most excellent points.
Don't know why I haven't thought of this before.
Here at TPM we've repeatedly noted the tendency for Republicans (and also non-Republicans) to argue that non-white voters somehow aren't quite real voters. The point is often framed as noting how up-the-creek Democrats would be without black voters.
True, of course. But what's the point exactly? Presumably any political party would put at something of a disadvantage if one of their major constituencies was suddenly struck from the rolls.
As I said when we last discussed this, I don't like making too much of this. I think the people who say such things haven't quite thought the point out. But their underlying assumption pretty clearly seems to be that blacks or Indians or whoever aren't quite real voters, and that Democrats who can't quite get the job done with ordinary white voters have to resort to them as a sort of electoral padding.
www.talkingpointsmemo.com
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The week after the 2000 election--acting as if Bush was already the president-elect--he noted that the race really wasn't all that close because if you just take away all the black votes Bush won 55% of the vote. That prompted me to crunch the numbers and find that if you take away all the white men Gore won 56%-%40.
|
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's not news to most of you but.... |
|
some of them even revert back to that 3/5ths of a person philosophy....
doesn't surprise me
|
Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think it's more the fact |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 05:57 PM by Sandpiper
Here at TPM we've repeatedly noted the tendency for Republicans (and also non-Republicans) to argue that non-white voters somehow aren't quite real voters. The point is often framed as noting how up-the-creek Democrats would be without black voters.
That Democrats can read the writing on the wall and realize that the "white vote's" share of the electorate as a whole is getting smaller with each successive census.
I'm glad the wingnuts keep focusing their attention on locking up the angry white male vote, because it means that within a generation or two, they will have made themselves a permanent minority party.
It's what happened to the GOP in California.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. scalia embraces this thought |
|
has said out loud. females either
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. he had a speech taped at an university. |
|
was suppose to be closed doors and said wasnt for the public. he was talking about a dead constitution. and that women and minorities had better get use to the idea white male the boss, has alwys been, lol lol certainly not in those exact words. i didnt save
was interesting
|
physioex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
6. We can expect to play his evangelical/big business card... |
|
That's what got him to power (aside from Florida). Look at them try and use church voter drives to get votes.
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I think Josh had a great response to this mumbo jumbo once |
|
If voter's had to affirm the theory of evolution prior to voting then Democrats would win by landslides.
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Atrios Mentions GOP Hispanic Outreach- |
|
their email sign up for Hispanics (written in Spanish) only has four options for employment:
Military Educator Senior Farmer/Rancher
No options available for lawyer, doctor, stock broker etc.
:puke:
It's a wonder they left off the option for hotel worker.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. They also left out fast food industry |
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Of course they don't. They don't even think non-whites are real Americans |
|
Took me fifteen years of listening to my in-laws before it dawned on me that there never will any compromise for Whites. They expect Hispanics and Blacks to drop every hint of their culture and drop Affirmative Action and allow Whites to continue to have control of this country. That's it in a nutshell.
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. They don't even really consider them to be people. That's why it's so |
|
easy to bomb them without the least bit of concern about it.
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
and GOP operatives mention that the GOP has strong support from white males. It's subtle, but the implication is those votes matter more. For fundraising having white males support you is great but they still have only one vote. The Dems will win once again by gaining majorities with women, huge turnout with African-Americans, and getting a majority of latino/as.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |