coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:52 PM
Original message |
Are the American people stupid enough to re-elect Bush? |
|
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 07:53 PM by coloradodem2004
Reflecting a little on Reagan's death, I did not care for his policies. Some of the parallels are that he was disliked by many throughout the world, just like Bush. He was not very bright, like Bush. The economy was terrible, again, like Bush. He was "Confident" like Bush. He had a very intrusive foreign policy style, like Bush. And he got re-elected in 1984.
THe differences are, while Reagan was confident, his was an easy going kind of confidence. He was a lot smoother than Bush and he seemed to actually have some genuine charisma whereas Bush comes off as a petulant child almost all the time. While Reagan had an intrusive foreign policy, he did not get us into a costly war like dimson did. He at least had an expressed belief that after 5pm, we were all Americans and not Democrats and Republicans. His approval ratings were a lot higher too in 1984. What do you think? What is your assessment of our chances now?
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The similarities are chilling... |
|
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 07:54 PM by indigobusiness
The differences, superficial.
|
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. The differences are not superficial |
|
b*sh's approval ratings are in the toilet, while r**gan's rating were very high in 1984.
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. I referred to the men...not the fools that adore them. |
|
the differences ARE superficial.
|
troublemaker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They are plenty stupid enough but |
|
most women and just enough men don't like war, so Bush is out.
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. But women are suckers for "security"... |
|
I'm shocked at what I'm hearing out there.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. About half of the people are that stupid |
|
and about half of the people are not.
There's just a few percent who teeter on the edge... I don't *think* the Republican pep rally this is going to create will cause them to vote for the Chimp, but who knows?
|
cjbuchanan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Need to change your subject line |
|
Bush cannot be "re-elected" since he was not elected in 2000.
Regan's big strength was that he was likable. He was able to pull people away from the Dem party. In 1984, both my parents voted for him. Neither had ever voted for a repug before.
Bush, on the other hand, is not pulling Dems away this year. The party is more united then it has ever been. Bush is not trying to reach out, he's trying to stir the base. Because of this, and many other reasons, Bush will not win in November.
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
17. And Smarty Jones was a lock. |
|
Never count unhatched chickens. This is still a horse race.
I'm betting on Kerry.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Any Bush bounce will be artificial and won't last |
|
By the end of the month it will be time for the Clinton book roll out and Farenheight 9/11.
And Bush can't be "re" elected because he was not elected the first time. He is the former Texas governor occupying the White House who is running for president.
|
alexwcovington
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Listen to the media whores say "it was a good week for Bush" and "if Iraq stabilizes and it's about the economy, Bush wins" and you bet I think that Americans are that fucking stupid.
GIGO--Garbage In, Garbage Out.
|
coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
The only reason that Bush had a good week is that no colossal failure happened. No more bad news came out this week and they keep on lying about the economy while the jobs being generated are pieces of shit, part-time or temporary. The economy is a piece of shit if you are not rich.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. You and I know it's bullshit, but |
|
the 'folks' who don't obsess about politics, all they know is what they hear on TV, and if it's on TV it must be true, right?
I got this stuff from last night's shows on PBS, and these people are supposed to be the professionals, the people who know what's going on in the world.
I have to wonder sometimes who has pictures of whom.
:mad:
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. Bush is considered to have a good week, these days |
|
...when he doesn't step in a pile with BOTH feet.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. He lawyers up in the Plame case, he |
|
loses his CIA director, and he has a "good week". It fractures my brain and makes my eyes hurt.
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Something's rotten...and it ain't |
lastknowngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes they are they just watch the mindless blond bimbos on |
|
television news stations. They only read what someone else rights and maintain that vacuous and stepford wife look. That's it! They are stepford news readers! I've been so foolish thinking they actually understood what they were saying.
Sorry if I have insulted any blonds.
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message |
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Hard to say, really. I'm pretty stupid, and I'm voting for Kerry |
|
Gawd, I wish the whole country was as pea-brained as me.
|
indigobusiness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
Kazak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Did you say "re-elect"? |
rfkrocks
(846 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-05-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
23. yes and what sacres me is |
|
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 09:19 PM by rfkrocks
not only him again for 4 years but delay and frist continuing majority control-the republic is in serious trouble with all the gerrymandering that delay pulled off in texas the house may be out of reach-scary times-BTW I agree with you one hundred percent that the economy is horrible unless you are rich-the numbers look good for the masses of Americans but the bottom line is there is dry rot allthru this economy
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message |