darknemus
(330 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 12:56 PM
Original message |
Dem Convention.. What would you do if Nancy Reagan was a speaker? |
|
As we all know, there's no love lost between Mrs. Reagan and the BFEE. With Nancy's new found passion for stem cell research, I truly wonder if she could be 'persuaded' to speak out against a candidate who doesn't support it. Love will do some strange things to a person - and, regardless of your opinion of them as a couple - its obvious there was alot of Love there, big time.
So, just what would happen if, somehow, Nancy decided to speak at the DNC convention? To say that Ronnie might not have agreed politically with the people there but that there are bigger issues, such as helping the greater common good? Its not like the Republican machine is gonna come out and slander her afterwards.. it creates the ultimate quagmire for those on the right.
Personally, I see about .000001% chance of this ever happening - but, if it did, somehow, it would be such delicious irony.. thoughts?
-darknemus
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That would be amazing. |
|
I'd also be in fear of Nancy's life if she did.
|
Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That would be something. |
|
But I also think it would highlight the single-issue stance that a lot of voters have. Is that a good thing?
|
coreystone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 01:20 PM by coreystone
I think that there have been far too many times in the course of American politics that have overly emphasized the importance of most of the single-issue movements in this country. So many times these issues have obfuscated some of the more far reaching debates which the American people should be engaged. That is not to say, at all, that I would depreciate the issue of "stem cell" research as being important, but, there seem to be so many issues that we need to prioritize.
I really don't believe the Nancy would ever call to the DNC to allow her to promote "stem-cell" research in a political forum.
I guess, I really feel that most of the time that "single issue" agendas, for the most part, tend to be rather narrow in their perspective of the "greater good"; at least in a utilitarian frame of thought. But, at the same time, there are so many isolated pockets of need, that we must be sure that there is not a tyranny of utilitarian thought which jeopardizes the needs of the few.
|
playahata1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
18. Her putting stem-cell research on the table with the RNC isn't going to |
|
go over well, either. Colin Powell tried to do the same with Affirmative Action in 2000, and look what and where it got him, the doofus!
|
cjbuchanan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And the right wing machine would go after her. I can already see the stories about her "Hollywood astrologer" telling her to go after Bush.
If she spoke and limited her speech to mainly talking about the points we agree on, then I would be okay with it. Still, I don't think the Dem party needs to eulogize Regan.
|
RebelOne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Well, I wouldn't boo her, but I certainly wouldn't applaud her. |
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I would (applaud her): courage must be commended no matter |
|
the political stripe or previous failings, IMO. She's gone through 10 full years of hell (granted aided by help the average "Joe" would never have, but hell nonetheless). I think that earns her a little consideration if she were to step forward to try to counter some of the RW lie factory. It will never happen, but I'd certainly commend her if she did.
Nancy is certainly more deserving of respect than Babs, for heavens sakes... But, you can sense the underlying tension and barely disguised animosity towards her-- even among RWers. That sort of amuses me, really.
|
jeff30997
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Stranger things have happened... |
|
She would certainly be a powerfull ally but it's no going to happen.
|
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought it was fantastic when the Bradys spoke at the Dem Convention in support of stricter gun laws.
|
BringEmOn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Oh, crap! Now, somebody's going to suggest Nancy Reagan for VP |
Andy_Stephenson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I think Kerry should pick |
|
Nancy Reagan as his running mate.
:evilgrin:
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Morning Dew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
How 'bout McCain and Nancy as our ticket.
lmao
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 04:22 PM by greatauntoftriplets
Welcome to DU.
On edit: Just checked your profile. You are not new to DU, my bad, but I haven't seen you before. Never fear! A friend who has been on nearly 3 years has 12 posts to her name.
|
Morning Dew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-07-04 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Thanks for the welcome anyway ! |
|
The board moves so fast that my opinion gets posted by several someones before I even see the thread, lol.
|
molly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I hope she fights hard for stem cell research |
|
they really can't smear her, can they?
|
Pobeka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. They'll smear anyone if it helps them stay in power. |
|
They make up lies faster than any other regime in recent history.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I welcome all allies in the war against Bush |
|
I won't follow them blindly but they are welcome to go after Bush.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I would try to be open-minded about what she had to say (nt) |
playahata1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-06-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Oh, I'd LISTEN to her if that were to happen. |
|
Anyone who is an enemy of Bushco is certainly a friend of mine.
|
DinahMoeHum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-07-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
21. I wouldn't mind having her speak about stem cell research |
|
and Alzheimer's disease.
Remember, she and Ron started off as FDR Dems.
:kick:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message |