Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'War on Terror' replaced Carter's focus on advancing human rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:18 AM
Original message
'War on Terror' replaced Carter's focus on advancing human rights
"Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced that opposition to terrorism would replace the Carter administration’s focus on advancing human rights throughout the world."

The September 11th Sourcebooks


National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 55
Edited by Jeffrey Richelson and Michael L. Evans
September 21, 2001

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the abortive attack (possibly aimed at the White House or Camp David) that resulted in the crash of a jetliner in Pennsylvania has resulted in a new and extraordinary emphasis by the Bush administration on combating terrorism. During the last ten days key administration officials, particularly President Bush, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and Secretary of State Colin Powell, have repeatedly emphasized that their long-term objective is the destruction of terrorism – a goal to be achieved by the death or apprehension of terrorists, the destruction of their infrastructure and support base, and retaliation against states that aid or harbor terrorists.

    Terrorism, however, was hardly ignored in previous administrations. In fact, at the beginning of the Reagan administration, Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced that opposition to terrorism would replace the Carter administration’s focus on advancing human rights throughout the world. Although opposition to terrorism never really became the primary focus of the Reagan administration or successor administrations, each of these paid signifiacnt attention to the issue and produced many important documents that shed light on the policy choices faced today. Terrorism has been the subject of numerous presidential and Defense Department directives as well as executive orders. Terrorist groups and terrorist acts have been the focus of reports by both executive branch agencies (for example, the State Department, CIA, and FBI) as well as Congressional bodies – including the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Congressional Research Service. The General Accounting Office has also produced several dozen reports evaluating the U.S. government’s ability to prevent or mitigate terrorist strikes, including, one just yesterday, September 20, 2001.

    The following documents, some of which were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, include assessments of the terrorist threat and a CIA profile of Usama bin Ladin, presidential and Defense Department policy directives, the details about U.S. response to specific terrorist attacks, and evaluations of U.S. government preparedness to deal with terrorism.

I. Terrorism and Usama bin Ladin

II. Congressional Research Service reports

III. General Accounting Office reports

IV. Department of Defense Directives, Instructions and statements

V. Presidential Directives and Executive Orders

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB55/index1.html

-------------------------

- Just think what COULD HAVE BEEN if the US had stayed with Carter's focus on advancing human rights around the world instead of the Reagan/Bush approach of secret wars and support and funding of despots and terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Alas, Q, you forget Carter's "malaise speech"
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 09:33 AM by BJ
"...It is a crisis of confidence. It is a crisis that strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will. We can see this crisis in the growing doubt about the meaning of our own lives and in the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation. Link

He told the truth (actually it's a very good speech) that the American public didn't want to hear. (Hey, we're 'Mar-ah-guns. We don't need to sacrifice shit!)

Then the whore media ramped up Reagan and his "shinning city on the hill" crap.

But, oh yes, your are very, very right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah...I guess Americans want to hear lies whispered softly in their ears.
...instead of the harsher truth.

- But PEACE and HUMAN RIGHTS don't feed the war machine like wars and rumors of wars.

- We should have taken the road less traveled and sought peace instead of perpetual war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC