Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton for SCOTUS. What do you think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:06 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton for SCOTUS. What do you think?
I heard some wingnut awhile back talk about how if Kerry wins he will definately appoint "Slick Willy" to the Supreme Court where he can destroy our nation for years to come. I say, let the Freepers have it! I'd enjoy watching their little heads explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like it, but...
...Clinton was disbarred due to the whole RW witch hunt thing. What didn't they do to try to destroy this good man?

I do hope Kerry appoints the most liberal people possible to the SCOTUS. And pull a Reagan and appoint younger justices. I'd like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Only for 5 years
having him on the Court would be the ultimate payback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. would a 40-45 year old liberal survive confirmation?
All the Repubs would need is 40 votes to filibuster him or her.

I'd love to see it, but I think we're going to have to 'settle' for Ruth Bader Ginsburg type quiet nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I think a Supreme Court seat is too high-profile.
As long as Kerry nominates lots of young liberal justices - plenty for conservatives to pick from - the Republicans in the Senate only hurt their own image by filibustering such a high-profile position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You don't need a law degree to be a Supreme court Justice.
Anyone can be appointed, even Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Clinton has a law degree
He is only disbarred for five years. However I can't see the righties allowing it to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There are no requisite qualifications
for Supreme Court Justices. You just have to make it through the Senate gauntlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsstranger Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton on the SCOTUS???
There would be mass suicides on the Conservative Republican side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is disbarred, so he's out. Let's try Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. one doesn't have to even be a lawyer to be on the supreme court
to be on the supreme court one does not even have to be a lawyer. although most if notall of them are. so clinton can be there. but i don't want to because there are too many limitsput on them and i want clinton to be out in thepublic saying what he wants and meeting with people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. have we ever appointed anyone who...
has never been a judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Earl Warren n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Oliver Wendell Holmes
http://www.lucidcafe.com/lucidcafe/library/96mar/holmes.html

"Young man, the secret of my success is that
at an early age I discovered that I was not God."

-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:19 PM
Original message
I'm thinking Al Gore
I love that picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. A HELL of a great Idea!
We have some great lawyers in the democratic party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Put Hillary on the SCOTUS.
Make the righties blow a gasket big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nah, SCOTUS is supposed to be a quiet position-
And I want Bill to keep talking. It's also a re-active postition (you respond to cases that are presented) As AG or something else in the cabinet he could be pro-active.

Honestly, I think what he should really be is a peace broker, ala George Mitchell in Ireland. Fairly autonomous, using his charisma and heart. The Middle East could use his prgamatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. It would be lunacy, even had he not been disbarred
How would "the left" feel if Bush nominated the most despised, devisive righty he could find? Granted, it would be tough to even narrow it down to a short list, but still, he could try. Trent Lott, maybe. Or Tom Delay. We'd howl, and rightly so.

To even think that Bill Clinton should even be considered is silly. It makes "us" sound so much like *oooohhh....shuddderrr* them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Get real...
Court nominations are controversial enough without the explosion trying to get Clinton on would cause. Besides, in criminal justice cases, I'm not all that impressed with Clinton's record as prosecutor, governor, or President. And, he may be a bit too pro-business.

Some asshole was just trying to whip up Kerry hatred from lingering Clinton hatred.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eeyore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think that wingnut is dreaming
There is no way in hell that anyone in their right mind would try that one. Pure and simple scare tactics.

eeyore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wasn't Clinton also forbidden from arguing in front of SCOTUS?
I know he was disbarred for five years but I seem to remember he was also permanantly banned from arguing in front of the SCOTUS.

I found this:

http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/10/01/scotus.clinton/

Was this resolved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. I Think Hillary Has the Judicial Temperament
Her husband would be better suited for more people-oriented work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Edwards would make a much better Justice ~ He's young and able
He would make it through the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. Only with overwhelming D Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC