|
Generally, it's hard for me to be optimistic about political issues, because (1) it's harder to repair damage than to do damage, (2) you can't score points on defense (hence, we're going to rally around a candidate based more on what we hope he won't do -- appoint Opus Dei justices, start new wars, sign "Patriot II" legislation, etc. -- then his potential for any major movement forward), and most of all, (3) crime pays. If anything, the recent Reagan-blast underscores the last point -- this is a man who was forced to admit he oversaw the sale of weapons to the al-Qaeda of his time (Iran being Public Enemy #1 in the press), and instead of being burned in effigy nationwide he's hailed now as a man who "even his opponents must admire". Even Richard Nixon largely got away with his crimes, and we're still piecing together the real enormity of his administration.
So the chance that everyone in this batch of crooks will get away scot free seem very real to me. But there is one thing that keeps me crossing my fingers instead of crawling into a bottle to hide.
In The Simpsons episode "Who Shot Mr. Burns", the police give Moe (the bartender) a lie detector test. (This being a cartoon, of course, lie detectors actually work.) This leads to the following exchange.
Cop: Do you hold a grudge against Mr. Montgomery Burns? Moe: No! (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: I didn't shoot him (Lie detector dings.) Interrogator: Checks out, sir. You're ok sir, you're free to go. Moe: Good, cause I got a hot date tonight. (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: A date. (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: Dinner with friends. (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: Dinner alone. (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: Watching TV alone. (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: All right! I'm gonna sit at home and ogle the ladies in the Victoria Secret catalog! (Lie detector buzzes.) Moe: Sears catalog. (Lie detector dings.) Moe: Would you unhook this already, please?! I don't deserve this kind of shabby treatment! (Lie detector buzzes.)
This is basically what's been happening over Abu Ghraib (and the increasingly related issue of Guantanamo). Nobody in the administration is smart enough to just shut up and ignore charges -- they always have to lie about the charges, in a lazy obvious way that inevitably leads not only to getting caught in those lies, but opening up a new tier of scandal to investigate. It wasn't happening at all. We didn't know it was happening. It wasn't that bad. We didn't know it was that bad. It was a "few bad apples", not official orders. We didn't know they were issuing those orders. We didn't mean to issue orders that bad. Well, it was just the one prison. We didn't know it wasn't just the one prison ...
As my brother points out, it's getting to the point where they're going to practically be directing the press investigation against themselves. Rumsfeld: "And I can assure you, in no way was the Vice President embezzling from the Social Security fund to feed a drug habit." Reporter: "Uh, that's reassuring, but my question was about the 4th of July festivities."
|