Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional Black Caucus to lean on Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:06 PM
Original message
Congressional Black Caucus to lean on Nader
(subscription required)

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/49_141/news/5975-1.html

CBC to Lean on Nader

By Erin P. Billings
Roll Call Staff

June 21, 2004

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus will meet privately with independent presidential hopeful Ralph Nader on Tuesday afternoon to tell him in no uncertain terms that they want him out of the race. The CBC asked for the sit-down with Nader in April at the urging of Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.). The 39-member group wants to personally urge Nader — widely blamed for Democrat Al Gore’s narrow defeat in the 2000 presidential race — to abandon his White House bid.

CBC lawmakers, on the verge of formally endorsing Democratic Sen. John Kerry (Mass.) for president, said they fear a repeat of 2000 this fall. Members said by staying in the race, Nader will hurt Kerry’s chances and secure a second term for President Bush. The CBC chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), said the group is committed to electing a Democrat to the White House and feels to that end it is critical to reach out to anyone who might be “blocking those efforts.”

Cummings said the CBC will try to impress upon Nader on Tuesday that while the independent candidate and Kerry have differences, they are minor when compared to the differences between Nader and Bush. “Hopefully, Mr. Nader will look at the big picture — that being he wants the country going in a much different direction than the country is going in now. We will ask that he not be an aider and abettor to anything that might be harmful to the Kerry campaign.”

One CBC member said the meeting with Nader will likely be a “very direct and blunt conversation.” Others said they expected the session to be “hard hitting” and that the group will not approach Nader with kid gloves.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Nader like Bush will simply repeat himself
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 12:08 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
out of a desire to stick to ideology irrespective of facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Times sure a different for Nader.
To my knowledge, he hasn't received an ounce of good press this year.

Makes you wonder what is going on in that head of his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gom Jabbar Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good
I don't agree that 2000 was all Nader's fault (unless he invented and implemented ChoicePoint in Florida), but...well...I guess I'm just an anti-democratic bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But as a consumer advocate, he should have responded to Florida
and he didn't. He didn't. He just kept blabbing that "Al Gore cost ME the election." At least Pat Buchanan had the balls to admit that Florida was messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. how is signature gathering going?
there was supposed to be a pr event here in illinois when they submitted the petitions. then it was postponed, then i heard nothing. how many states is he on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. only the ones that the reform party put him on
about 12 of them? He has yet to qualify for a single state on his own. His supporters just aren't showing up. In AZ 92 % of the signitures were republicans and there are too many discrepancies so he is probably not going to be on the ballot there.

PS... Nader is blaming Dean because Dean is telling his supporters to ignore Nader this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Arizona - There is a Chance He Will Not Be On the Ballot?
I missed that Cheswick, is that right?


I must say, I would be happy if he was not on the ballot in AZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gom Jabbar Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. They should be leaning on Kerry.
If they want to attract leftist votes, they should get Kerry to reverse his rightward drift.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Amen to that bandera, seems like they forgot the
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 01:26 PM by candy331
"crying in your teacups" from Kerry. Vote for Kerry if they will but calling for Nader to get out the race is not something they should take on. It looks just like politics as usual and I haven't heard a clamor from the Black community for Nader to get out.I don't think this looks good on their part at all. They should be championing loudly the issue of paper trails for the electronic voting since they were the most disfranchised of voters but to buy into this Nader cost us the election makes them look silly when that surely is not the main issue for Blacks. Got their priorities wrong on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. More white people telling blacks what to do
typical Naderite paternalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Somehow I think the CBC understands
that moving to the center is actually how you WIN. Duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. they should be doing both
Nader is the opposition. There is no reason to treat him as anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is the caucus entirely Democratic?
Or is J.C. Watts still in Congress? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldian159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'm almost positive Watts never joined CBC
and I think he retired in 2002 anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. i think he was part of the CBC , but can't say for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. J.C. Watts retired from Congress so the CBC is all democratic now
it was a huge loss for republicans since they lost the only black person on their side. but from what i hear jc watts tried to do something to make the republican party more diverse and to reach out to women and minorities, but tom delay dismissed him. so watts just got tired of it all and decided to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Not all black legislators join the CBC
It is a progressive group mostly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are welcome to introduce legislation putting
ranked voting into effect.

That would sure be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Do you have any more suggestions for the black folks?
After all, they need someone like you to tell them what's best for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. No, but I've got plenty of suggestions for
the elected officials who make up Congress, regardless of their color.

And yeah, one of them regards trying to improve our election system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Then why don't you tell them your suggestion
Make an appointment with one of the CBC's members and talk to them about your concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Have e-mailed many of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Well, whatever you do
don't strain yourself fighting for what you believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Believe me, if I could afford to go down to D.C. and talk with
some of them face-to-face, I would.

Heck, I can't even afford to get as far as NY to see some of them in their home offices.

So e-mail is the best I can do, and it is better than doing nothing at all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. actually there are welcome to treat Nader as the opposition
And you know that the legislation you suggest would never make it out of commitee with a republican controlled congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd love to be a fly on that wall
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Me, too! Don't fool with the Congressional Black Caucus --
they stood tall, alone, on the House floor after the stolen election. I'll never forget that, and no one having the courage to stand with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. That day I knew I wasn't long for the Dem Party
I was disgusted by the cowardice on display that day. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Political strongarming worthy of the GOP
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 02:04 PM by DemsUnite
Nevermind trying to woo previous non-voters or adopting a more progressive platform to make Nader's candidacy redundant.

It's much easier to snooker the voters via an "either-or" decision.

Pathetic, but not surprising.

(edited for clarity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's terrible the way those black people throw their weight around
I hope when whites get some power, they won't resort to "strongarming"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I was thinking along Party lines. You brought up race.
Oooops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yes, those black DEMS are like NAZIS
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 02:25 PM by sangh0
You brought up race

The thread is about the Congressional BLACK Caucus, Einstein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It's about a caucus, who is endorsing a Democrat ...
attempting to quash a percieved electoral threat.

Nazis? Whatever, Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, it's about the Congressional BLACK Caucus
not just any old caucus.

But keep telling them what's best for them. I understand that really goes over well in the black community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. are you black?
I don't actually know so since you want to tell the CBC what to do, I am just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. How do I know you're not black? Simple
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 04:50 PM by sangh0
You accused blacks of abusing their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I am accusing Democrats of abusing their power.
One doesn't need to be black to levy that accusation.

Which by the way, I am. My mother was black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. You accused BLACK Democrats
Edited on Mon Jun-21-04 04:58 PM by sangh0
In case you didn't know, the Congressional BLACK Caucus is made up of the black members in Congress.

Which by the way, I am. My mother was black.

I guess that makes you the expert on all things black, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. You are not interested in a rational debate.
Have a nice day.

If it makes you feel any better, respond to this post--to get the last word in. You are playing a game, and I'm not interested in participating.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. sangh0
I love you!!!!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. I LOVE YOU TOO, CATWOMAN
Now stop that damned cackling, woman!!

:spank:

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Gee, maybe the CBC thinks getting rid of Bush is MOST IMPORTANT
But we can't assume they know what they're doing, can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. the CBC is very progressive
unfortunately the rest of the congress is controlled by the repukes. So they are doing what they think is best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nader is terrible on the issue of race, if you ask me. I appreciate that
his economic message lifts all boats, but one of the things he said that made me cringe the most was when he'd go to a college with a largely white audience and tell them that for most of them, whether Bush or Gore were president would make little difference in their lives.

It's not so much that that isn't true. The shameful thing is that he didn't have the courage to go into a black neighborhood where college attendance rates might be in the low teens and give that same speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Great points AP
And it's refreshing to see criticism of Nader based on issue and not emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. Let Maxine Waters go one-one one with Ralph. She'd make his Randi Rhodes
interview seem like a visit from PBS's Mr.Rogers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kick his ass Sheila Jackson Lee!!!!!
I would love to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. There is a danger...
There is a legitimate danger that by trying to get his platform all at once Nadar will split the left leaning vote between himself and Kerry and allow Bush to be re-elected. In fact in theory Nader could take 33% and Kerry 33% and bush win with 34%. If this were uniform Bush would sweep every state... why is that bad. Because once in office the mandate from the people matters little for 4 years. Bush would be free to move the country further from Naders vision.

Some say that Kerry should move more left to take the votes back. But this ignores the fact that this would cause more voters to be "closer" to Bush than to Kerry. He would loose more votes than he gained.

Also every poll I have seen shows that the votes do indeed come from Kerry.

As the system stands today the only way to exicute change is to "move the center".

Nadar's campain threatens to take the coutry even further from his vision and he must by now know this. Therefore the only reason I can see for his running is egotism.

RH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC