Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC "fact-checking" F9/11...coming right up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:47 PM
Original message
ABC "fact-checking" F9/11...coming right up
anybody see the job Candy Crowley wannabe Lisa "little fridge" Meyers did today on MSNBC?

what do you want to bet they do the same thing now?

she mostly attacked Moore's OPINIONs, only a couple of factual analyses, which were WRONG, if one goes to Moore's site

can't wait for this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. i had to leave the room
that's sad. i wanted to see/hear the report, but i can't take a chance. waiting for your review
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. FACT: Bring pretzels to the theater
Show them how ya feel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who's side are you fucking on, Clarke?
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 05:52 PM by JonathanChance
My goodness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he's on ABC's payroll, in case you didn't know
starting to wonder.....did they get to him?

I taped it; will go back and see what he said about the flights, as he was PISSED in his book about how cavalierly they let these people go.

remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. moore fails to say flights were greenlighted by Clarke
so WHAT?

moore "hints" that Bush may have gone easy on Saudis cause of financial ties

they show Richard Clarke saying "that's nuts"

uh oh

then they talk about the idyllic Iraq he shows, without saying how bad Saddam is

SO WHAT?

that was IT, except for one thing I didn't get while typing

unbelievable

WTF is up with Clarke, though? he's defending Bush in this, or appears to be.....wonder what else he said, as he was closely edited, WRT the Saudi connection

at any rate, that was an OPINION, not a "Fact"

they did not refute ONE factual inaccuracy

only OPINIONS, just as Meyers mostly did

how can they get away with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was NBC not ABC that Lisa Meyers did the "fact check"
on. Gotta kiss *'s butt you know. Oooh so the NEPHEW of ONE congressman was called up to Afghanistan and they want to say Michael Moore did not get it right. Oy vey! Let's see, the percentage of well off kids in the army versus those who don't come from the upper middle class....I say it's probably 9 poor/lower middle class kids to one rich kid in the army. I also suspect that most of the rich kids are officers.

Going to see F/911 in just over an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I know....this a different one....much shorter, less detailed, BUT
more "believable" because of Clarke's presence

still, he's only giving his opinion, not refuting with facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TryingToWarnYou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. Nephew? Wasnt it sons and daughters that was the issue?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I think what the criticism said was that there was ONE
congressman who had somebody over there, but it was the Afghan, not Iraq

Moore's point in the movie, I do believe, was regarding soldiers in IRAQ, which is the whole point of his movie.....NOT Afghanistan

they lie all the time, tryiing to bait and switch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wish They Did Some Fact Checking Before We Went To War
Amazing that now they are eager to fact check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. All U.S. media will be fact checking Moore, while repeating Bush
They treat everything Bush says as the truth and everything anyone critical of Bush says as a lie. That's the U.S. media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. exactly........did they EVER run any segments using that title?
fact checking Bush's SOTU?

fact checking Powell's UN cartoon show?"

fact checking Cheney's "reconstituted nuclear weapons program?"

WHEN did they ever do shows checking that sort of thing?

have they done anything like that yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michael Costello Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Moore said that on NBC...
Moore was being cross-examined by Matt Lauer on MSNBC and he said he wished they had been as tough on what the administration was saying before the war as they are on him.

A lot of what I've heard is just mud-throwing. Computer people call it FUD - Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. They're hoping to cast doubts on what he says and hope most people won't be paying attention. They seem to be focused on the Bin Laden air line thing, but in the movie it said what no one seems to dispute - on 9/13 planes flew around picking up Bin Ladens around the country when no one else was allowed to fly.

Moore is getting smarter as he goes along and leaving very little for people to attack him with. He is more ready for the attacks against him that will come than he was beforehand. If you really listen to what they say, there's not really much there that undoes anything.

Most of what they do is focus on a few things and say Moore isn't giving "both sides of the isssue". Well the problem is we only get one side of it as it is. People can see the movie and then go watch Fox News for another side. I haven't seen one attack that said anything in the movie was factually untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. That's called
a non denial denial

Peace

Hobo

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. they're so smarmy
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 05:56 PM by Cocoa
Moore has got to be an embarrassment to these whores. Peter Jennings especially, after he made such a fool of himself over Bush AWOL, thanks to Moore.

edit: their "debunking" of Saudi money having an influence on Bush is just one guy saying it's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clarke did not give.....
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 05:59 PM by dennis4868
the final orders to allow the saudis to fly on and after 911...FBI called in and said let them fly and Clarke simply said, "okay." Clarke did not have the authorization to give the saudis permission to fly on 911....WTF is up with Clarke? Everyone please read Unger's book and you will get the truth of that entire episode on 911....senior WH officials tell the FBI to let the saudis fly and in turn the FBI calls Clarke and tells him they are going to fly to Krentucky...and clarke says, okay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. agreed.......I read his book, and he was PISSED that they did that,
especially without interviewing them

the debunkers CAN't win on this one

what person in their right mind would want to let these people out of the country within DAYS of the event?

all one has to do is remind the imbeciles out there how many hundreds (thousands?) of arabs, etc., were rounded up and held incommunicado for MONTHS, under no suspicion at all?

what kind of sense does THAT make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Shit....
the media remembers what fact checking is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. propaganda techniques
coming stronger and more often. i'll post them every time they apply. and ironically, the web source is freerepublic.com from 1998. they were using the army manual to pick at the clinton admin (amateurs compared to the bush propagandists).

--snip--
Card stacking or selective omission. This is the process of choosing from a variety of facts only those which support the propagandist's purpose. In using this technique, facts are selected and presented which most effectively strengthen and authenticate the point of view of the propagandist. It includes the collection of all available material pertaining to a subject and the selection of that material which most effectively supports the propaganda line. Card stacking, case making, and censorship are all forms of selection. Success or failure depends on how successful the propagandist is in selecting facts or "cards" and presenting or "stacking" them.
Increase prestige. In time of armed conflict, leading personalities, economic and social systems, and other institutions making up a nation are constantly subjected to propaganda attacks. Card stacking is used to counter these attacks by publicizing and reiterating the best qualities of the institutions, concepts, or persons being attacked. Like most propaganda techniques, card stacking is used to supplement other methods.

The technique may also be used to describe a subject as virtuous or evil and to give simple answers to a complicated subject.

An intelligent propagandist makes his case by imaginative selection of facts. The work of the card stacker in using selected facts is divided into two main phases:
- First, the propagandist selects only favorable facts and presents them to the target in such a manner as to obtain a desired reaction.
- Second, the propagandist uses these facts as a basis for conclusions, trying to lead the audience into accepting the conclusions by accepting the facts presented.
--snip--

ref:
"Propaganda Techniques" is based upon "Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques" from "Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1" published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. excellent! did you post another one today, elsewhere?
love the propaganda stuff

you KNOW Rove's been studying Bernays, Goebbels, Ellul, on and on

almost EVERYthing they do is aimed at the emotional perceptual level.

they CANNOT allow anyone to analyze what's being said, or to give their mendacious assertions any context
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. propaganda is cranked up now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Got a link for that, pretty please?
Looks like it could be VERY useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. psychological operations army manual fm 33-1
easy link is at freerepublic.com, where they used it as reference against clinton admin in 1998:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a360d496e0c97.htm

just google it to find another web source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dan Harris Reporting.....he was the person talking
They basically said this was all bunk....."like trying to get something healthy from a fast food place" They may have even said McDonalds.....


This was definitely a blast at the film....and they used short bits from Richard Clarke.....but made me wonder what else they were talking to clarke about.....

This was a totally put down....but from what some of DUers have said...MM puts down the media for not doing their job....so they may be attacking back.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. What a piece of *** reporting
Final remarks where that this may cast doubt on the rest of the documentary............Lisa Myers has always been a totally biased reporter, and I don't believe a word she says. Makes me mad this is accepted as true fact checking!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. this was NOT the baby fridge's report.....that was on MSGOP
this was ABC

two different reports; both equally damning, equally, uh, fictitious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. the saddest.....
thing from the ABC report is that we now know that Richard Clarke is a whore...he sold himself out to his pimp ABC/Disney! He completely contradicted his book tonight....really said day! I thought he was one guy that would never sell himself out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why is it that Moore's movie gets fine tooth comb scrutiny
yet RWers prattle on, telling lie after lie through the nation's airwaves, hour after hour day after day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. welcome to the age....
of the corporate media....lie about war and thousands die because of the lie....no problem! Lie about a BJ....you are dead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushwakker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. God if the nets spent half as much time checking the truth
or falsity of what presidential candidates say we might actually have an informed electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. BOMBSHELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Clarke contradicts himself in this hit piece!!!!!
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 06:19 PM by buycitgo
OK.....who's got Clarke's book?

I gave mine away already, but I'm pretty sure he was NOT happy with those flights taking off without any sort of interrogation

this is from the TAPE I made of the show:

CLARKE: I thought the flights, uhhhhhh, were, correct, uhhhhh, the Saudis had reasonable fear, uhhhhh, that they might be the subject of vigilante attacks in the united states--after 911. and there is no evidence even to this date that any of the people who left on those flights were people of interest to the FBI.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I really can't believe he SAID that shit!

well, gee, Dick, maybe cause they LEFT the country without being interrogated, and will NEVER be available AGAIN might be part of the reason they weren't "people of interest??????" maybe if they HELD some of these people, including the guy who supposedly KNEW about 911 in advance, they might have BECOME people of interest???

scratch Richard Clarke, far as I can see?

again, who's got the book? did I get this wrong

those quotes are word for word, with the uhhhhhs included, which tell me he's LYING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. crap....
i gave my Clarke book to my dad and he is in Florida.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. How the hell can he know Bush's motives for ignoring Bin-Laden?
Clarke SO confidently denied that the family connection played any role in the negligence of this administration. He lost a lot of credence for me for pretending to know such a thing and use it to attack Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. like i said....
another media whore was born tonight....Richard Clarke....employee of ABC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. Naw, they must have found his Achilles Heel
like they found O'Neill's, a week after O'Neill said "I'm old and I'm rich there is nothing they can do to me" he went totally silent.

They Trashed Clarke and that didn't work so now they found the something that would work, we'll never know what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. I gave my copy to my sister.
I'll see if I can get it from her tomorrow. It's a while since I read the book but I don't think he was agreeable to the FBI directive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. They have a vested interest in discrediting Moore
Because, if he is telling the true story, the obvious question becomes, why haven't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsMyParty Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Do they fact-check the spew of Limbaugh and the other
criminal element voices of the republican party?? (all those rightwing radio boys who have broken our laws and now are making a fortune spewing garbage--i.e, Ollie, etc.)??? I didn't think so. In fact, have they fact checked their own whore media???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
submerged99 Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. Those were only a few of his arguments
Notice that the networks aren't saying anything some of Moore's other statements in the film.

1. no weapons of mass destruction
2. poor people make up the bulk of the military
3. civilians were killed in iraq
4. most of the hijackers were saudi's and none were Iraqis and Iraq was never involved in the planning or execution of 9/11
5. The U.S backed Iraq in the 80's

Those are just a few and DU ers can fill the rest out. The networks didn't bother to confirm that these were all in fact true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. My understanding
if the many posts from those who have seen the film with their own "lying eyes" is that the BULK of it is clips of the "players" speaking in their OWN voices. WHAT IS TO "FACT CHECK???" :crazy: :freak: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. Amazing that there is a higher standard for Michael Moore
Than there is for our president. Just amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innoma Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Debunking Moore? Please!
You know, its getting to the point where I am just sick of watching the news anymore. Every news media outlet in the US spewed forth all the fallacious reasons for the necessity of impending war, and to add icing to the cake, most of the newscasters and talking heads seemed to be breathlessly awaiting the Shock & Awe Show as if it were some kind of theatre. Later, when the reality belatedly sets in and the media has to step back a fraction from their bloodthirsty push for war and their so-called facts, every right-winger in the country screams the media have always been liberal traitors who are undermining the country when, in fact, it was this very traitorous media that handed the war to our government on a silver platter with a side order of 'Zieg Heil!' So, it sickens me to see this newly minted 'fact-checking' and 'objective analysis' regarding Fahrenheit 9/11 given the media's highly questionable objectivity -- just *where* have these fools been these past few years?. It takes a heavy dose of hypocracy for any newscaster to be able to 'debunk' Moore's movie while holding forth the illusion they are somehow being fair and balanced. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
37. oh, NOW they're "fact-checking"??????????
f***ing lazy-ass WHORES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. That was bullshit.
Unsubstantiated assertions abound.

"Liberal media" my ass. We should be so lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC