|
(NOTE: I'd post this as a new thread, but with a history of 3 whole posts, that's not possible, so...)
I managed to persuade an avidly apolitical friend of mine to go see the second showing of F911 today in Fresno, CA. In his younger days, my friend was a theatre employee, so my attempts to get to the film early were met with very high skepticism. "It's a documentary," he said. "There'll be plenty of seats left. Trust me!" As it turned out, I'd say the theatre was at about 90-95% capacity, so its a good thing we got there early!
I pretty much knew going in Fahrenheit 9/11 would be more polemic than documentary, but that's okay because an artfully done, incendiary polemic can be just as effective (if not more so) than a coldly reasonable, objective documentary. More hit his targets on occassion with humor, sarcasm and pathos, to which the audience responded enthusiastically (incldung a round of applause both at the conclusion of the film and during a segment critical of Rumsfeld). But I think that reaction was due less to the fiery nature of the film than with many people's growing distaste of the current administration. While the overall arc of the film was smooth and sustainable, I had really hoped for a far greater impact -- after all, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft and Rice have loads and loads of material in their sordid repetoire that should be able to make even a person on their deathbed rise up in righteous fury.
I think Fahrenheit 9/11 would probably be most effective for those like my friend; people who are essentially apolitical, to which the material in the movie will prove to be a real eye-opener, as opposed to those of us who have been reading and keeping up-to-date these last few years. In that sense, I think, you could call the film an unqualified success if its able to bring that information to a largely apathetic nation. Had Moore had no trouble in finding a distributor, and had their been no right-wing outrage and subsequent attention, I think Fahrenheit 9/11 would have fallen off the radar reasonably soon. In that sense, we owe those opposed to the movie a debt of gratitude for ensuring it will get widely viewed.
I've sometimes worried that right-wingers might try to top Fahrenheit 9/11 with their own version of "Triumph of the Will," but given the characters in question and their recent history of failure, I somehow doubt they will be able to pull that one off -- at least not to the degree that it would usurp Moore's film.
Overall, I'd probably rate Fahrenheit 9/11 as a B or a B minus. Its certainly a good enough film, and it may end up proving to be historically momentous in helping to unseat a current government. But given the material available to be mined, I think Moore is a good shot, but not quite an expert marksman.
And that's just my own personal opinion (accent on the last word, please!).
|