Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What part of the whole Iraq War situation made it "WRONG" for you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:28 PM
Original message
Poll question: What part of the whole Iraq War situation made it "WRONG" for you?
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 09:29 PM by neoteric lefty
READ FIRST FOR CLARIFICATION:I DO NOT KNOW if the title is clear enough for my meaning. I am NOT asking which part is the worst in your opinion. I would think most people would say civilian and American casualties. What I am asking is what part of the war made it wrong in the first place in your eyes. For example, if we could guarantee no civilian deaths, would the war then be justified in some way? Or, if we could guarantee a stable Iraq in the end, then would the war be OK? I hope you all understand what I am asking. What criteria put the war OVER THE TOP for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other.
All of the above. It opened Pandora's Box...as I said more than a year ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree but
something had to be first for you to say to yourself, "What a crock of shit!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The whole damn idea!
What else did it take? I lived through Vietnam, saw the entire picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. ok, ok... don't yell
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 09:34 PM by neoteric lefty
:)

I was still only a gleam in my parents eyes back in those days.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. I totally agree
The Whole Damn Thing from the Get Go!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Diversion of attention away from REAL TERRORISTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey John
yeah, I think that was a big one but the idea of attacking a country before they had done anything is what first got me upset about Iraq. That and the fact the W would be "leading" our troops. I can see Patton rolling in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lied before the War even started
The Administration lied their way into the war in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. All that and more-
it never made any sense to me to go to war in Iraq. I don't believe in war but setting that aside, I couldn't make sense out of any of the Du(m)bya camp's arguements. That's why I find it so amazing that people as smart as Powell appears to be could be so stoopid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I do not know if was stupidity,
gullibility or blimd ambition that made him do such a dishonest thing. I truly believe that he knows what he did was wrong and it eats inside of him, unlike Bush or Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. The first thing(s)
that got my radar up were these:

1. We were in Afghanistan and trying to find OBL and then all this talk of Iraq??? Smelled very fishy.

2. I NEVER believed Iraq posed a threat to us. That means all the talk of mushroom clouds and here in 45 minutes got me VERY suspicious of what the heck bush and co were doing....

3. It was preemptive. You only carry out preemptive attacks on another country if you have incontrovertible evidence of an imminent attack they are about to carry out on you. I didn't feel in any way this met that criteria. In fact, once we had our troops amassed on the Iraq borders and our weapons pointed at THEM, THEY were justified in carrying out a preemptive attack on US, but we know how THAT would have gone.....they were a fourth-rate military power.

My bullshit radar was going off SO HARD on the Iraq thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. All of these events are intimately connected. Each and every one of them
were foretold before the bush*s shock and awegasm. They are all part of the whole package.

Other: all of the above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. The part where Bush & Co. made Iraq sound like the old USSR
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 09:39 PM by KeepItReal
...in terms of military power and projection capabilities...and the intent to use that mythical Iraqi military might against us.

- USA had planes flying and bombing sh*t in Iraq ever since Guf War I.

- Iraq's army was already decimated and weren't much of an offensive threat.

- I don't remember Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Turkey or Iran cowering in fear from Saddam and asking for help

- CIA said that if Saddam even had nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, he would only use them if and only if we *INVADED* Iraq.

Those acts of misinformation and deception by Bush & Co. on Iraq's "strength" should warrant prosecution of Bush & Co. as Iraq was a relatively weak state.

And if you think they could have gotten away with funding and supporting terrorists, just look at Libya. They tried it and got nailed to the wall. Experts have said that state-sponsored terrorism is not something you can do and just get away with. It is traceable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Preemptive war doctrine
This is not in our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. It did not serve the people.
If we went in, killed everyone, stole all the oil and turned it into a colony. I MIGHT not have minded it so much.

Even though containment was working and working quite we went in anyways. That's a waste of money right there. Then we get there and BushCo just uses it as a excuse to make more of his corporate contacts richer. YAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. I mean call me naive, but who in the world ever heard of let's start a war
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 09:45 PM by merh
to prevent a war? Call me stupid, but what threat could SH have if he is in a continent so far away and an ocean separates us from him? I had never heard about his navy and I didn't think his troops could make that swim if they were well armed.

It was the lies on top of the lies, on top of the lies, on top of the lies and it was taking advantage of tragedy, a tragedy so great that our nation had trouble comprehending it and was told not to mourn, but get over it.

The bastards.

Oh yeah, they have not been protecting the homeland, there have been no extra precautions taken at home and they are closing military bases and VA hospitals. Hypocrits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. taxpayer-funded mercs at $1000 per day
with ZERO accountability is still my biggest shock about this whole charade...these cowboys playing shoot 'em up wild-west style will invite a lot of hatred of regular americans for years to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Other ....
The threshold for justification was lowered to dirt ...

It is one thing to fight a war against REAL enemies based on REAL factually based justification ... in this case: the justification was based on known lies ... knowingly promoted ...

This was no just war: everything else afterwards is the proverbial icing in the fucked up cake ...

EVERYTHING is wrong: since there was no real justification ...

Getting rid of Saddam, or the fact that Saddam is now our of power, isnt enough to overcome the WH's fraud of justification ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gulf War Syndrom - 150,00 our on disability and 50,000 have
applied. It's criminal to send our soldiers back in without any idea what the cause of the problem was. Which leads us to depleted uranium which is turning into a nightmare for the Iraqi people and probably the troops when they come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Invasion of sovereign nation.
This was a gross violation of sovereignty of nations, which is the foundation for international peace. Wars must only be waged against expansionist forces that themselves are attacking the sovereignty of others. This was a beacon of a new colonialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. lies and pre-emptive war doctrine
It was obvious at the time that Iraq had no serious WMD -- the evidence presented was "thing gruel, about two peas to the gallon." That's what i called it at the time.

And just exactly where is it that we get the right to decide who in this world can have WMD and who can't? Look up the word "arrogance" in the dictionary, and you will find Shrub's picture and his doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bulling ahead with it when Blix and Ritter,
two guys who had actually been inspectors on the ground, said Iraq had nothing in the way of weapons, was no threat to anyone, didn't have the means of becoming a threat to anyone, and had no way to gain the means to be a threat to anyone.

Add to that the very prudent decision of the French to veto any resolution at the UN calling for war, plus the millions of people worldwide (especially in countries that still have a free press) demonstrating against Bush and his stupid plan to invade.

Add to that the fact that this gang of idiots had no contingency plans for when the Iraqis didn't greet the troops with chhers and flowers and accept whatever they were handed in the terms of a government, and the way the rebuilding has only been an excuse for coproate profiteering and his built only US military bases without employing any Iraqis and while leaving their country in shambles.

This is why this whole exercise in Pentagon hubris is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. The utter fraudulence of the reasons for war itself.
As well as the gotesque farce of watching Bush during the buildup to war demand that Saddam "disarm" and act as though there was something within Saddam's power to avoid a US invasion.

It was sickening.

Watching "Shock and Awe" was also utterly revolting. I've nevver felt so ashamed of this country than at that moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can't sort 'em out -- all of the above
There was NEVER any justification. All these and many more, including the fact that the U.N. obviously didn't WANT us "enforcing" their resolution, and our allies (other than Britain) weren't seeing the danger either.

And what I call "the common sense test": Were any of Saddam's neighbors afraid of him? NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. The bald faced Lyinggggggg to the American People!!
I and all or most of you and the world KNEW it was a bad idea to go there. Millions marched all over the globe. Some were anti war some were like me: THIS IS A DUMB IDEA. They didn't attack us and doing this thing while it's not only illegal, it will also stir up a hornet's nest like the world has not seen. voile', so it has......

Most importantly, we DIDN'T FINISH IN AFGHANISTAN...we turned our back on those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamiati Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. In the first place,
I never agreed with Bush's policies or how the election was won in the first place....justice?? fair?? WHERE??? Hence most any action he took I saw as being selfish & greedy from the very inaguration of this man.......

In addition to this hell, I knew (ok, researched conspiracy theories) about the Bush Family legacy & their ties to the Nazi money laudering scheme way before this happened.....
As the old saying goes the apple doesn't fall far from the tree!!

Oil Man!! From Texas no less.......
(sorry no offense to most Texans, but just the powerful rich ones, yes that includes LBJ too)!
It WAS all about OIL,OIL,OIL,MONEY,MONEY,MONEY,POWER,POWER,POWER!!!

:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsummers Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Every single thing down to the last "detail" was wrong
of course this stupid, inept administration did not have any details - they just had a vision of the general picture with people showering us with flowers and candy. HOW OBSCENE!!!!!


Cheney the Clown and Sideshow bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. Other: Fall of the US into blatant imperialism
Invading Iraq was a bad idea from the gitgo. It didn't suddenly became a bad idea because it ran into unexpected problems.

Living through the recent history of the United States has been like watching a Shakespearian tragedy. You can see exactly what's coming, but there's no way to stop it. Does anyone go to see Macbeth and say, "Gee, if he could have just brought off the murder of Duncan without killing all those other people, he would have been a really swell king"?

Murdering Duncan was obviously a bad idea because it was a step in Macbeth's ultimate downfall. And invading Iraq was a bad idea for exactly the same reason. People in this country are having a hard time recognizing how far gone we really are, but the US as we've known it is doomed. The only question is how hard the fall will be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC