Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry, but I don't get why Divorce records should become Public?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:20 AM
Original message
Sorry, but I don't get why Divorce records should become Public?
I think a divorce between a couple should be private and remain private from prying eyes. That goes for Kerry, Limbaugh, Ryan, etc. It's simply one more reason not to get fucking married in this crazy ass country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am ignorant of the facts ..
But didnt Ryan's ex wife talk ? ..

Wasnt SHE who revealed the facts surrounding her own divorce ? ..

If so, she is free to do so ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I heard that she fought making the records public, in order to
protect their children. Don't know if that is true or not, but that is what I heard from a friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes, the fact that she did not want any of this made public
has been confirmed repeatedly in the press. Beyond that fact, if an individual or a couple
wishes to make it public is one thing but it should not be for the taking by the public. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Bear in mind
She used this "incident" to get custody and she was the one who cheated on him and left him. I don't know who to believe.

I think anything that involves some sort of public document is public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. the problem is that a negative reason is 'required',
and, although the couple may be amicable about the divorce, that is not a valid reason, therefore one is customarily 'invented'. you are correct about it being public, however i feel it should be strictly private. (speaking in general, not specifically to the ryans.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimoreboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Many states have "irreconcilable differences"
And require no dirty laundry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Like I said below, fight re division of property is only reason dirty ...
laundry would come up in most states.

Had the Ryans been so worried about these details being made public, they would have come up with a private, negotiated settlement. When you turn to the courts because you can't resolve the property division privately, you do so with the understanding that what you say becomes part of the public record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. thanks. didn't know that. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. No she was against the release just like her ex husband was.
Anyone think that the RW orchestrated this so that they have precedent to get Kerry's records?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. ALL court records are public documents
Divorce records are usually only sealed in cases with children who may be hurt by the public release of the documents.

Regardless, though, court documents are considered public. You have the right to go down and request any court document you choose. It's a matter of public record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. But energy policy records secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is a world of difference b/w Ryan and Kerry
In Kerry's case, his ex-wife does not want them released. She was the one who went loony-toons and drove him away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dardi Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Ryan's ex-wife did not want the records released either
No world of difference on that front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Ryan is a pig
Kerry is simply trying to save the Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. And Laura Welch ran a stop sign and killed her own boy friend
too bad we can't get all the records on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. The records were not sealed initially
Jack Ryan wanted them sealed from the start, having political aspirations, but Jeri did not want that initially, she fought, successfully, them being sealed. It wasn't until later when Jack got serious about being a candidate that he went back and requested she allow them to be sealed, and this time she agreed.

This guy is phony as a 3 dollar bill. Do you think he quit his lucrative investment banking job to teach out of the goodness of his heart or because it would look good in his campaign ads? Do you think he's gonna go back to teaching now? Fat chance....

Hypocritical puke got what he deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. The reason the Republican elders of Illinois turned against Ryan...
...has more to do with the fact he lied point blank to them when asked if there was anything in the sealed divorce records that were embarassing. He lost his credibility with them. No more trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because, as we learned from Great Britain, secrecy in court proceedings
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 08:47 AM by AP
encourages people to tell lies and interferes with defendant's ability to rebut charges.

Divorce today rarely requires cause so there are rarely salacious details in divorce papers. The only reason someone would make allegations of outrageous acts would be to get a greater monetary settlement, and you really wouldn't want people saying things under oath that aren't part of the public record in order to get more money.

If it's a public record, you can always be (within the statute of limitations) charged with perjury if you lied. If the record is sealed, you wouldn't have to worry about some third party looking into your claims under oath. So, public records discourage people from lying.

Having said that, if you take the Ryan divorce, much of their records are STILL redacted. One of the few things that wasn't was that Ryan wanted to have PUBLIC sex with his FAMOUS wife in front of people he didn't know. I think it's pretty obvious that he didn't have an expectation of privacy in THAT bit of information. But apparently a LOT of other things in that file are still private.

Incidentally, a few weeks a ago the US 2nd circuit court of appeals ruled that CT can longer seal records left and right without any cause. Apparently, if you were rich and famous in CT the courts have been willing to seal anything you ask them to seal, from Jack Welch's divorce papers, to a local judge's DUI. I think it's obvious why that isn't fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are there witnesses that verify her allegations?
Just curious, because my friend still says "if" he did that, when I argue that if he wanted sex in public, then it should be public record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. He hasn't denied it.
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 08:55 AM by AP
And she swore to it when she signed the complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Incidentally, if a couple can decide on how to split money out of court,
there would be no need to even create a public record of outrageious acts in court.

So, when Ryan wouldn't give his wife what she wanted, he was on notice that she was now going to bring this up in court and put it in the public record.

Certainly, you don't want people to get more money than they deserve because they're able to blackmail you with embarrassing facts, but what do you want to bet that Jerri Ryan got fromt the judge pretty much what she asked for originally? She's just as embarrassed that she had to rely on those facts as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're not supposed to be
But some moron lawyer usually asks them to be released and some moron judge says yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Otoh, Backlash: JK Will Get the Coveted Divorced-Male Vote n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. A divorce uses my tax dollars.
It involves 2 adults, and all legal pleadings, except a FEW (juvenile records, adoption records, etc.) are matters of public record.

Act in haste, repent at leisure, but remember--- everyone gets to see the dirty laundry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC