trumad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:20 AM
Original message |
Sorry, but I don't get why Divorce records should become Public? |
|
I think a divorce between a couple should be private and remain private from prying eyes. That goes for Kerry, Limbaugh, Ryan, etc. It's simply one more reason not to get fucking married in this crazy ass country.
|
Trajan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I am ignorant of the facts .. |
|
But didnt Ryan's ex wife talk ? ..
Wasnt SHE who revealed the facts surrounding her own divorce ? ..
If so, she is free to do so ...
|
Lisa0825
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I heard that she fought making the records public, in order to |
|
protect their children. Don't know if that is true or not, but that is what I heard from a friend.
|
Paradise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Yes, the fact that she did not want any of this made public |
|
has been confirmed repeatedly in the press. Beyond that fact, if an individual or a couple wishes to make it public is one thing but it should not be for the taking by the public. IMO.
|
Baltimoreboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
She used this "incident" to get custody and she was the one who cheated on him and left him. I don't know who to believe.
I think anything that involves some sort of public document is public.
|
Paradise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. the problem is that a negative reason is 'required', |
|
and, although the couple may be amicable about the divorce, that is not a valid reason, therefore one is customarily 'invented'. you are correct about it being public, however i feel it should be strictly private. (speaking in general, not specifically to the ryans.)
|
Baltimoreboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Many states have "irreconcilable differences" |
|
And require no dirty laundry.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Like I said below, fight re division of property is only reason dirty ... |
|
laundry would come up in most states.
Had the Ryans been so worried about these details being made public, they would have come up with a private, negotiated settlement. When you turn to the courts because you can't resolve the property division privately, you do so with the understanding that what you say becomes part of the public record.
|
Paradise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. thanks. didn't know that. :) nt |
beyurslf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. No she was against the release just like her ex husband was. |
|
Anyone think that the RW orchestrated this so that they have precedent to get Kerry's records?
|
Walt Starr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. ALL court records are public documents |
|
Divorce records are usually only sealed in cases with children who may be hurt by the public release of the documents.
Regardless, though, court documents are considered public. You have the right to go down and request any court document you choose. It's a matter of public record.
|
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
3. But energy policy records secret. |
AngryAmish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
6. There is a world of difference b/w Ryan and Kerry |
|
In Kerry's case, his ex-wife does not want them released. She was the one who went loony-toons and drove him away.
|
Dardi
(189 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. Ryan's ex-wife did not want the records released either |
|
No world of difference on that front.
|
AngryAmish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Kerry is simply trying to save the Republic.
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. And Laura Welch ran a stop sign and killed her own boy friend |
|
too bad we can't get all the records on that.
|
never cry wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. The records were not sealed initially |
|
Jack Ryan wanted them sealed from the start, having political aspirations, but Jeri did not want that initially, she fought, successfully, them being sealed. It wasn't until later when Jack got serious about being a candidate that he went back and requested she allow them to be sealed, and this time she agreed.
This guy is phony as a 3 dollar bill. Do you think he quit his lucrative investment banking job to teach out of the goodness of his heart or because it would look good in his campaign ads? Do you think he's gonna go back to teaching now? Fat chance....
Hypocritical puke got what he deserved.
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
7. The reason the Republican elders of Illinois turned against Ryan... |
|
...has more to do with the fact he lied point blank to them when asked if there was anything in the sealed divorce records that were embarassing. He lost his credibility with them. No more trust.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Because, as we learned from Great Britain, secrecy in court proceedings |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 08:47 AM by AP
encourages people to tell lies and interferes with defendant's ability to rebut charges.
Divorce today rarely requires cause so there are rarely salacious details in divorce papers. The only reason someone would make allegations of outrageous acts would be to get a greater monetary settlement, and you really wouldn't want people saying things under oath that aren't part of the public record in order to get more money.
If it's a public record, you can always be (within the statute of limitations) charged with perjury if you lied. If the record is sealed, you wouldn't have to worry about some third party looking into your claims under oath. So, public records discourage people from lying.
Having said that, if you take the Ryan divorce, much of their records are STILL redacted. One of the few things that wasn't was that Ryan wanted to have PUBLIC sex with his FAMOUS wife in front of people he didn't know. I think it's pretty obvious that he didn't have an expectation of privacy in THAT bit of information. But apparently a LOT of other things in that file are still private.
Incidentally, a few weeks a ago the US 2nd circuit court of appeals ruled that CT can longer seal records left and right without any cause. Apparently, if you were rich and famous in CT the courts have been willing to seal anything you ask them to seal, from Jack Welch's divorce papers, to a local judge's DUI. I think it's obvious why that isn't fair.
|
Lisa0825
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Are there witnesses that verify her allegations? |
|
Just curious, because my friend still says "if" he did that, when I argue that if he wanted sex in public, then it should be public record.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 08:55 AM by AP
And she swore to it when she signed the complaint.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Incidentally, if a couple can decide on how to split money out of court, |
|
there would be no need to even create a public record of outrageious acts in court.
So, when Ryan wouldn't give his wife what she wanted, he was on notice that she was now going to bring this up in court and put it in the public record.
Certainly, you don't want people to get more money than they deserve because they're able to blackmail you with embarrassing facts, but what do you want to bet that Jerri Ryan got fromt the judge pretty much what she asked for originally? She's just as embarrassed that she had to rely on those facts as he is.
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
16. They're not supposed to be |
|
But some moron lawyer usually asks them to be released and some moron judge says yes.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Otoh, Backlash: JK Will Get the Coveted Divorced-Male Vote n/t |
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
24. A divorce uses my tax dollars. |
|
It involves 2 adults, and all legal pleadings, except a FEW (juvenile records, adoption records, etc.) are matters of public record.
Act in haste, repent at leisure, but remember--- everyone gets to see the dirty laundry.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |