Sperk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:02 AM
Original message |
So, was the 2 day early "turnover" meant to distract from Supreme court |
|
Padilla should be released and Gitmo prisoners are entitled to lawyers. You loose AshKKKroft!!!!!!!!!
They are sooooo pathetic
|
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That and fear of attacks |
Caution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
distract from SCOTUS distract from F9/11 Head off attacks (a valid and good reason...occasionally the evil do something good if even by mistake).
|
Timefortruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They had to have known. This is also why Olsen resigned.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't think your reading on Padilla is correct. Check other threads |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 10:07 AM by LittleApple81
in GD... I think they gave a big chunk of the victory to BushCo. I will have to wait until the dust is settled before I understand the meaning of this ruling. Here is one: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1878267
|
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. By not ruling on the Padilla case, the lower court ruling stands... |
|
and the bush admin lost that one, Padilla won it, that's why it was appealed to the USSC by the bush admin.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I think it was as they said to avoid attacks. |
|
It was a smart move on their part.
|
mctrotter5
(255 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
7. This was so predictible..they can get legal opinions about getting |
|
around the Geneva Convention but had no idea that too deny a defense was against the constitution. They HAVE to distract from that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |