soundfury
(280 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:59 PM
Original message |
GW said: we werenÕt awares LOL!!!!!!! |
|
Boy did I laugh when I heard that in the movie.
But then I thought, This guy graduated from Harvard and Yale!!!
What does that say about Harvard and Yale?
What does it say about the system of meritocracy our country is supposedly based on?
Very disturbing indeed.
The way Bush speaks, can you imagine what a nightmare his professors had grading his written papers? That is if he wrote any himself.
How he graduated from those Ivy league schools is beyond me.
It must be some kind of underground Affirmative Action system for the rich and well connected.
That must be it. ;-)
|
Kathy in Cambridge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He paid someone to write his papers and take his tests |
|
that's what people like Bush do. They cheat.
|
( posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. At the University of Chicago -- |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 04:11 PM by 56kid
we used to say "If you're good enough to get into Harvard, you're good enough to graduate from Harvard," referring to undergrad.
I said that to a Harvard grad once (without telling him the Chicago part) and he started arguing with me about it until I told him we said that at U.C. Then he started laughing and said I had a point.
We always thought Yale was different.
You've got it exactly right, it is underground Affirmative Action.
|
Tosca
(540 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I like the 4-minute Harvard man joke.
Within 4 minutes of meeting him, he'll tell you he went to Harvard.
|
Divernan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He was admitted to Yale as a "legacy" |
|
, i.e., his dad had gone there AND given bucks to the school,and his name was on all his exams so the faculty gave him what used to be called a gentleman's "C". One of his Harvard MBA instructors commented that Bush had a short attention span and couldn't respond coherently in class (or words to that effect), and asked Bush, how did you get in here? Bush smirked and said, My Daddy has a lot of friends.
Most Yale and Harvard grads are NOT legacies and were not admitted because of their fathers' influence. They (like Bill and Hillary Clinton) got admitted on their brains and their hard work, and are extremely bright. Remember Chaney had no connections back then and washed out of Yale as an undergrad.
|
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Here is the big clue... |
|
he graduates from Yale
and can't get accepted into the University of Texas law school
So - he goes to grad school where there are more family connections and pull - but suddenly he goes for an MBA instead of the law school. So why the switch in fields? Perhaps Harvard Law isn't quite so lax per legacies?
|
Divernan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. No. All law schools have anonymous grading on exams. |
|
It's the same at Harvard as at Texas. Every semester, students are randomly assigned a number to put on their exams, instead of their names. So the professors can't be pressured (consciously or unconsciously) to give better grades to kids of VIPS/big donors/ alumni. However, the MBA program let him coast through on his last name.
|
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Ah... so even if he got the big donor "in" to harvard law |
|
which he couldn't get at UT (no admissions)... he wouldn't have been able to get through Harvard Law. Very good point... so the switch (after being turned down at UT LAW) could have been the recognition on his own (or on those counseling him) that he wouldn't get to coast through as he had at Andover and Yale... hence the shift from law to business. Makes sense.
|
noiretextatique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
6. i ask about this when people claim you have to speak standard english |
DebJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. no, you have to have the right daddy. |
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
7. In this case, he actually got it correct, which leads me to believe |
|
it was a mistake on his part.
I don't recall the exact sentence but the word used was 'unawares' and it was used correctly(Not to mean that he wasn't lying, just the grammar was correct). The audience laughed in the theater I saw it with at that point too, but because it "sounds" funny or incorrect, doesn't mean it was.
Damn, I can't believe I did that. I feel reeeeaaaaalllll dirty. Bllleeeccchhhh.
|
Divernan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Just today he said "civility" when he meant "security" |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 04:44 PM by Divernan
He was reading (of course) his statement about the turnover of power. He said the United States will remain in Iraq as long as CIVILITY requires it. I guess you could say we're not going to kill and run, but take enough time to leave with good manners.
Have you noticed the insulting delivery of his comments. He speaks in an insulting manner with little words, as if he was addressing a very sloooooowwww audience. Then I realized that he's just parroting the way his advisers speak to him!
|
WoodrowFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
say he would have flunked him but he couldn't so he gave him Cs.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message |