Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Constitution follows the flag: history doesn't repeat itself in S.Ct.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:30 PM
Original message
Constitution follows the flag: history doesn't repeat itself in S.Ct.
I haven't read the S.Ct. decision today, but from what I can tell it sounds like the s.court is saying that the US consititution applies to Gitmo prisoners.

In the last four years when so many of Bush's actions seem to either repeat the mistakes of the McKinley administration or are undoing all the good done by FDR, this S.Ct. decision would be a rare example of learning from historical mistakes.

During the Spanish American war there was a debate in the united states over whether American colonies would be subject to the constitution. Liberals argued that the constitution followed the flag and if our government was going to control the colonies, then the citizens of the colonies were entitled to the benefits of the constitution. The fascists argued that the colonies were merely proctetorates and the constitution didn't apply. The latter argument one over. The result: brutal oppression and torture in the Phillipines once the government knew it wasn't going to be held accountable for its actions.

Well, it sounds like the Supreme Court doesn't want to allow the US to make the same mistake twice. As Bush would say, "fool me twice...don't get fooled again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which ones?
The US citizens, or the foreign prisoners?

As far as the US citizens are concerned, they deserve every right that any criminal in the US gets. But they're not getting them. Instead, the government is able to detain them indefinitely without being charged or given a trial (whether or not they're able to see a lawyer has been a point of confusion here- I'm not sure that it's been decided). The SC says that they have a right to "their day in court" (whatever that means) to ***PROVE THEIR INNOCENCE*** :puke: and challenge their captivity.

Of course, I'm not sure who they're supposed to tell that to- the prison guards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The people living in the colonies -- non-US cititzens, whether prisoners
or not.

I'm guessing that the S.Ct today isn't distinguishing between citizens and non-citizens in Gitmo. If you're under the jurisdiction of the US you're entitled to the fed courts, even if you're in Cuba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC