SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:44 AM
Original message |
Articulate well-read liberals...5/ Ignorant knuckle-dragging Rush-bots..0 |
|
Washington Journal today is a hoot.. EVERY single conservative who has called in today is a stammering, blubbering idiot..
One guy even said ..at least 5 times.. "I don't know much, but....."
Why on earth would you call in LONG DISTANCE and hold forever, to publically embarrass yourself???
Rush must be getting less effective.. His "talking points" used to be pretty easy to follow.. Lately, the conservofreaks cannot even seem to follow the script..:)
|
mopaul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. rush's drug addled mind is projecting onto his listeners |
|
there's so much unintentional comedy on c-span. many of these people are heavily medicated, or should be.
you can just see them sitting there in their underwear spilling coffee and throwing shoes at the cats. if i were the host, i'd be fired day one when the first spastic bushie called in.
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's the .."Ahh, tale yoo wutt" crowd... |
|
If it was not so sad, it would really be funny.. Those people do vote :(
|
Cheswick2.0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:57 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Rush is now a dry drunk, so they are all dry drunks |
|
They are having severe withdrawal problems.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I noticed that today. Remember Rush and some of the others were gone |
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. You're right.. they were all on vacation... |
|
Maybe they went together to coordinate the "talking points" a bit better...and dumb them down so the freepies could understand them better :)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |