K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:54 PM
Original message |
Question: How Can Shrub Get Away With The "Magic Marker?" |
|
You know that thing in F-9/11 where MM has the un-censored copy of Bush's military "service?"
And they blacked out the name, James Bath? And he has some big Saudi connection?
My question is why does the White House say they blacked this out...what's the official story?
I thought they could only do that for "National Security" reasons. Are they saying that's what this is?
Same with the report that blacked out all the Saudi stuff...HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?
|
SpiralHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There is nothing to see here. Move along. Better yet, shut up and sit down. BushCo will let you know when to think again.
BushCo loves you. Choco-rations may be increased 2 mg. next quarter. We have always been at war with Terrorism.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's Odd How Nobody Really REFUTES This Stuff.... |
|
They just keep making up weird stuff like the MM voter registration thing...they don't look at the very specific evidence the movie presents, or the footage, it's like hello, why were they dealing with the Taliban before 9/11 in the first place, what ABOUT that?
Isn't that how we ended up in this mess to start with -- energy interests dealing withsupporting obviously psycho regimes, like Saddam & Taliban until something blows up in our faces?
Too bad we couldn't invest the 100 billion plus we are pouring into that Iraq debacle into something like, oh how about RENEWABLE ENERGY? Now THAT would be patriotic...but the Bush cartel has other interests. Too bad for us.
|
Philosophy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-29-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. To them, "national security" means |
|
anything that will embarrass * or his puppetmasters.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |