Jewish neoconservatives led US into Iraq

TeeYiYi

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-07-04 05:31 PM
Original message

Jewish neoconservatives led US into Iraq

Jewish neoconservatives led US into Iraq

"The Insider" mailing list article, 07 July 2004.

An elite group of unelected Jewish neoconservatives and Zionists admit that they, not the US government, are responsible for the American policy on Iraq.

Last year, the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, interviewed the real policy-makers behind America's invasion of Iraq, who admitted: "we are responsible for what is happening".

These men openly confirm what most people have already realized about the true reasons for the war on Iraq. They reveal that that, deep down, the war on Iraq was not about finding WMD or removing a dictatorship. The war on Iraq is just part of their plan "for the shaping of a new Middle East". For some individuals, the riches of Iraq's oil alone was enough of an incentive. The ultimate agenda is to change the world.

Those who follow the Israeli media can sometimes gain a privileged insight into future events too. For example, if the conquest of Iraq is successful, which it was, the next step is "to go on to other Arab states after Iraq".

The shadowy figures who control the US government, whose faces are not as public as George Bush, intend "to create a new world order". With America at their disposal, they have the power to make it happen.

More: http://www.theinsider.org/mailing/article.asp?id=516

This from the Haaretz article of 4 May 2003:

The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it's possible. But another journalist, Thomas Friedman (not part of the group), is skeptical.

<snip>

This from Friedman:

"When I think about what is going to happen, I break into a sweat, Friedman says. I see us being forced to impose a siege on Baghdad. And I know what kind of insanity a siege on Baghdad can unleash. The thought of house-to-house combat in Baghdad without international legitimacy makes me lose my appetite. I see American embassies burning. I see windows of American businesses shattered. I see how the Iraqi resistance to America connects to the general Arab resistance to America and the worldwide resistance to America. The thought of what could happen is eating me up.

What George Bush did, Friedman says, is to show us a splendid mahogany table: the new democratic Iraq. But when you turn the table over, you see that it has only one leg. This war is resting on one leg. But on the other hand, anyone who thinks he can defeat George Bush had better think again. Bush will never give in. That's not what he's made of. Believe me, you don't want to be next to this guy when he thinks he's being backed into a corner. I don't suggest that anyone who holds his life dear mess with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and President Bush.

Is the Iraq war the great neoconservative war? It's the war the neoconservatives wanted, Friedman says. It's the war the neoconservatives marketed. Those people had an idea to sell when September 11 came, and they sold it. Oh boy, did they sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded. This is a war of an elite. Friedman laughs: I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened."

More: http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=280279

TYY