cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:23 PM
Original message |
nader with tweety NOW.... |
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What a smug asshole...eom |
JHBowden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Nader attacked the Republicans! |
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. nader praising Edwards pick....based on him representing the legal system |
|
and he called Cheney "snarly"
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
5. tweety bringing up the spolier roll...bush is falling soo bad ..it won't |
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. nader playing the anti-war role.....tweety letting him go..he should talk |
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
7. tweety brings up Ariz....and feels he was had.... |
|
crying about the way it was done.....saying attacking it is too expensive
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. ken lay the topic -- says it's delayed and others not being prosecuted |
|
three way debate questioned?
he wants an open debate...tweety giving a platform
|
Emboldened Chimp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Wait, he's criticiznig republicans, yet he takes their money... |
JHBowden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |
10. "Hannity will have multicandidate debates!" |
|
Nader is such a moron.
:dunce:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message |