Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Homeland ballot security?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:00 AM
Original message
"Homeland ballot security?"
According to an AP story today quoting Tom Ridge, Homeland Security Secretary, "officials are considering how to secure polling places come November." (See http://www.indystar.com/articles/3/161068-7433-010.html )

But, in addition to fending off "terrorists", will some of the actions being set in motion for Election Day target Democratic voters who have good reason to fear Republicans in uniform?

When elections are close, a time-worn GOP playbook draws on tactics from third-world dictatorships. Armed thugs are posted at polling places to harass and discourage minority and poor voters. Because of discrimination in the criminal justice system, a MAJORITY of minority and poor men in many inner city neighborhoods, and skyrocketing proportions of women, are on probation or parole. Police are free to "roust" those under "criminal justice supervision" whenever they want.

When Loretta Sanchez defeated Crazy Bob Dornan for a California House seat eight years ago, it was despite the presence of "ballot security" officers in special uniforms. The uniforms closely resembled those of immigration officials, well known for harassing naturalized citizens as well as undocumented foreign workers. (See http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/97/33/news-moxley.php )

And how did 911 Commission chair Tom Keane get to be ex-governor of NJ?

From http://www.prospect.org/print-friendly/print/V13/23/mcdonald-l.html :

'Americans might like to think that discrimination against minority voters ended with the civil-rights movement, but it's been going on in many parts of the country ever since. And BALLOT-SECURITY programs have been the usual vehicle. A notorious "anti-fraud" initiative was implemented before the 1981 gubernatorial election in New Jersey. The Republican National Committee formed a National Ballot Security Force.... On election day, the security force dispatched armed off-duty police officers wearing official-looking armbands to heavily black (and Democratic) precincts in Newark, Camden and Trenton. The Republicans also posted signs warning that the polls were being patrolled by security-force members and offering a $1,000 reward for anyone giving information leading to the arrest and conviction of election-law violators. A toll-free number was listed to report possible voter fraud.

The Democratic National Committee filed suit against the New Jersey and national Republican parties, and it was eventually settled. The defendants agreed not to post security forces at polling places or allow any other election tactics that targeted minorities or deterred them from voting. Despite the agreement in the New Jersey case, the Republicans resorted to similar maneuvers in Louisiana in the 1986 U.S. senatorial campaign involving Democrat John Breaux and Republican Henson Moore. ... Republicans ... launched still another ballot-security program in North Carolina in 1990, during the heated U.S. Senate contest between Republican Jesse Helms and Democrat Harvey Gantt.... After the election -- which Helms won -- the Justice Department sued the North Carolina Republican Party and the Helms for Senate Committee. The defendants, without admitting any wrongdoing, entered into a consent decree in which they agreed not to undertake similar ballot-security programs in the future
without court approval.

Copyright © 2002 by The American Prospect, Inc.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hidden in plain sight........
No American, Republican or Democrat, should tolerate "ballot security" provided by either of the political parties. And now, "ballot security" is being practices by a government agency instead of the parties, but the abouse is still there. Because of "terra" banana republic tactics are being implemented in plain sight....and nobody gives a crap.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Consent decrees the GOP signed in the past (after they "won") will be torn up
Party opportunists will come out of the woodwork to "help" on these security issues. These Republicans are quite clever little criminals.

And since the "Help America Vote Act" includes no national standards for election fairness, Democrats will have to fight corruption of "homeland ballot security" state by state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nixonwasbetterthanW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rehnquist perfected "ballot security" in Arizona

<http://www.badattitudes.com/Rehnquist.html>

Gee, does anyone think CJ Bill would recuse himself if "ballot security" issues confronted a 5-4 court this fall?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for the link
Maybe the GOP will slip up womewhere and provide good evidence for a Voting Rights Act lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ducks In A Row Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Vote absentee, and no worries about polls
Oregon does vote by mail all the time and it works just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC